Why did People go on crusades? There are many reasons why people joined the Crusades. Depending on the type of person you were, you would hold certain reasons to be more important than others. This is why so many people decided to join the crusades. The trip held much more value than just a success over opposing religion Islam; it also gave an immense chance for personal gain.
After all, the Christians were the ones who were leading the crusades and they were the ones who were the biggest advocates of them. The Pope was usually in charge of sanctioning the missions and it was clear that the papacy was on board with the missions. Their main mission was to reclaim the Holy Lands from the Muslim people who had invaded it. In Robert the Monk, Pope Urban II’s Call to the 1st Crusade, the Pope is talking to a council that was convened in the city of Clermont and he is quoted saying “We wish you to know what a serious matter has led us to your country, for it is the imminent peril threatening you and all the faithful that has brought us hither. From the confines of
The story beings with the religious dilemma that King James I had to face as members of the Catholic, Protestant, and Church of England clashed for the true sect of Christianity. The colonization of the Chesapeake region began when King James I pronounced the promise of great wealth and land
During the year of 313 CE, Constantine met his contender Licinius at Milan to negotiate on the policies associated to the Christian community. The rationality that lied behind the agreement was to eliminate the persecutions that were being faced by the Christians since long ago and to abolish the strict practices against them . Thus, the agreement allowed the religious freedom to all religious, slightly favoring Christianity. The Edict of Milan was indeed a milestone in legitimizing Christianity as official religion of the state in the years to come. At the time of agreement Constantine was still a pagan but he did not reduce his efforts to popularize Christianity.
However, the biggest difference with the Chesapeake region’s inhabitants was that the Puritans didn’t aim primarily for economic benefit or trade. They wanted to create pure, moral Christian society based on moral living. By hard working, integration of religion in politics, and social development of certain lifestyle practices, Puritans had a large influence on the development of the New England colonies from 1630s through the 1660s. Puritans believed in hard work as the pathway of success since they thought they were favored by God to succeed (Doc I). They tried to shun idleness and believed that being lazy is not profitable (Doc C).
Many people have given their lives to further the growth of the Church throughout the world and indeed many have admitted that even if God Himself were to visit them and suggest Joseph Smith was not really His messenger, they would not believe him, but would rather believe in Joseph Smith. This type of fanatical belief is indicative of how this belief has grown and perhaps that it may well be considered in the realm of “cultism” as well as simple religion? This type of fanatical belief is not limited to the Mormon Church. Indeed you find it in the Catholic Church and many of the southern Baptist churches and other protestant faiths throughout the world and certainly in the Moslem religion. It would seem it is indicative of the human race.
It was told that any Crusader would be rewarded a place in heaven, and forgiven their sins. The Crusades involved not only knights and warriors, but also commoners of both genders. Helping the Byzantine emperor Alexios meant protecting the citizens of Constantinople from falling under Muslim rule. Jihad, often thought of as a synonym for terrorism - recurrently thought of as acting in the name of Allah, means an internal moral struggle. Like a Jihad, the Crusades were postulant expeditions in the name of God, to protect the Holy Land from the Arab Muslims.
In history, Christians held Muslims to a threatening status before the crusades even began. In fact, the chances that the Christians met Muslims greatly improved their overall idea of them. During the crusades trade wasn’t allowed to be exchanged in fear of the Christians that would be excommunicated for associating with the Islams, even though trade still continued throughout the Crusades regardless. Politically the religious impact from the Crusades was in the massive expenditures that created an overwhelming effect on European politics. The crusades had massive armies that needed to be transported across extensive amounts of land which costed large sums of money.
In my opinion, I believe that the Crusades came about due to political greed and the need for power. I think sometimes it is seen as a serious of religious campaigns, but I don 't believe any religion would truly influence military battles to conquer the lands of other peoples, to me, that is the desire of power and greed. The First Crusade was called by Pope Urban II in 1905, which started as a "pilgrimage" then ended as a military expedition by Roman Catholic Europe to conquer the Holy Lands, which were originally taken by the Muslim conquests of the Levant. This began with Emperor Alexios sent an ambassador to the pope requesting military support, in which Pope Urban II, requested Catholic volunteers (Using religious beliefs to attract people
The Vikings often maintained their beliefs throughout their raiding, there was a huge pressure to convert to Christianity if they wished to have friendly relationship with the Christians. . The treaty bound the Viking leader Guthrum to accept Christianity, with Alfred of Wessex as his godfather, and Alfred in turn recognised Guthrum as the ruler of East Anglia. (McIntosh, 2014) More or less formal conviction applied to trade, the custom of 'primsigning ' was introduced. , since Christians were not really supposed to trade with pagans, this custom could allow Christians to trade with pagans.