A director named Baz Luhrmann turned The Great Gatsby into a film. By casting the right actors to portray the characters, Luhrmann effectively recreated the book on screen. The movie opens differently than the book, with Nick in the office of a therapist. Although this differs from the book, it puts a twist on the movie. After the events Nick went through, it is understandable that he needs to talk about everything that happened.
Movies are proposed to entertain us and lead us to a different time or place. But if you look at a movie deeper you see the themes and ideas put into the movie. Directors strive to show, the theme of the idea not just in the characters, but in the setting and camera work. Throughout the play knight riders, the director and producers use characters and images to project to the audience, what they hope that they see. Using this movie to project themes of leadership, even if they were not trying to this start even in the first scene.
How well can a director put a book into action as a movie? After reading the book The Color Purple by Alice Walker and watching the movie The Color Purple directed by Steven Spielberg, I was given both sides of the story written and the screen write. Contrasting the two together personally is quite tricky because both the book and the movie were great to take part in. However some events in the book were obviously different when watching the movie. While reading the book the reader can obviously notice the use of letters between Celie the main character and God who she writes too.
My final is about the difference between the book and the movie “The Outsiders.” This next paragraph is about the description difference between the book and movie. Then the paragraph after that will be about the description of the background or cars that the characters drive or live in. I think that the move and the book where basted of the same story but I think that when the directors made the movie with some different cars or house that can change the movie or they put different things in it so that the movie will look better. Altogether the movie and the book were pretty good and had good meaning to it about want to think of life and it’s alright to not be tough and hard. This paragraph is about the description difference between the main characters in the movie and book.
ellipsis. This technique was used in the ‘Activities’ column again and in the ‘History and Culture’ column. This is an effective and valuable technique because it creates tension as the reader is left for a couple seconds wondering what the next statement… will be. Ellipsis can be used at the end of a sentence of course but this would also be quite confusing for the reader. However this does mean that the door is open for a part two of a book of at the end of a script for a movie, this is why this is such an effective technique… The fourth language technique that was used was repetition.
The changes were made to add drama and suspense to the story. Capote balances out the nonfiction and novel part of his book, carefully modifying facts to limit his account’s distance from the actual truth. Capote did what he needed to do in order to make his book as compelling as possible with the expense of sticking with the facts. He shows how two contrasting writing styles can coexist in the same literary work. Truman Capote explores beyond the classic literary genres and opens the door for other authors to experiment with a new writing
ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOOS NEST NOVEL AND MOVIE COMPARISON At first, One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest was a novel written by Ken Kesey in 1962. Its popularity led to the making of a movie based on the novel. The words “based on” are carefully chosen, because those who saw the movie and read the book can all agree on the fact that the movie isn’t a perfect representation of the book, even though there are a lot of similar elements. To be able to see the big picture of the differences and the similarities of the novel versus the film, it is important to discuss these three elements: the protagonist, the plot and the characters of both the movie and the book. First off, one of the most remarkable differences between the book and the novel is the protagonist.
A story is a written work used to entertain, provide knowledge and understanding, and to captivate an audience. In today’s society, several movies are based off of novels. The reader expects the movie and the book to be replicas, but that rarely happens. Most of the time, movies have different locations within the setting, while adding in scenes and characters to a story line to further tell the story. Due to this, the exposure of vivid details allows the audience to receive more knowledge from the work.
In the films ‘Good Will Hunting’ and ‘Battle Royale’ it is evident that both characters face a challenge with their own respective obstacles. At the end, though the characters find out who they are and who they can trust. In this paper, I will be presenting the Laswell Model, Blumer’s theory, and the Attribution Theory. With these theories the reader, will have the tools necessary to understand the movies’s significance, the way they relate to each other, and have a better comprehension for the characters’ decisions and the outcome of the stories. Despite their different circumstances, the characters learned the same lesson.
While actors and costumes add other elements in both cases, the budgets for both projects are often vastly different. Language was also another element that Miller had to adjust from both projects. If you look in the text, the language used is far more relevant to that of the time period. The screenplay however, uses a similar form of this historical speech. Though, the text was written in the language patterns of the late 1700’s, when compared to the more modern Americanized version is lessened by Miller who states, “The Problem was not to imitate the archaic speech but to try to create a new echo of it which would flow freely off American actor’s tongues,” an important field to maintain when writing dialogue for