The first difference that stands out first when watching the opening scene of these two movies are setting. Zeffirelli’s version is set in Verona, Italy although Luhrmann’s version is set in Verona Beach in California. The use of different locations helps to show the time periods of the different movies straight away. The variability of location remains different throughout both of the opening scenes in the movies. The location in Zeffirelli’s opening scene remains the same until it is swapped for another location towards the end. The consistency of the location helps replicate the feel of the stage at the theatre as the viewer is looking at one main location like an audience member at the theatre. However, in Luhrmann’s adaptation the location is being constantly changed with the opening scene having 5 different locations. The numerous different locations exemplify the cinematic element of Luhrmann’s version which is the exact opposite intention of Zeffirelli’s interpretation. …show more content…
Zeffirelli and Luhrmann use props very differently. Zeffirelli uses a large quantity of props which makes the film feel more lifelike. He also uses props to convey messages. An example of this is the aftermath of the fight in the market. The camera pans to show the marketplace after the fight and shows misplaced food and hay strewn across the ground. The placement of these props helps to demonstrate the severity of the fight and chaos between the families. Whereas in Luhrmann’s version after the fight between the families the gas station goes up in flames. While the message is the same Luhrmann uses setting rather than props to convey the message. Another difference between the two versions that is very distinguishable is the
Throughout the play, most of the scenes took place indoors. In the movie there were multiple scenes outdoors and indoors. The directors chose to make this change because it added to the mood and made the movie more exciting by changing the scenery. This change left an impact of excitement
People are constantly being discriminated against. The use of props in the movie also allow us to portray the characters in certain ways. Raheem’s boom box is like his identity. When Sal smashed the boom box, Raheem lost a part of himself; and when the pizzeria was burned down, Sal lost a part of himself. Students can relate to this use of props.
The set was a simple layout of a monitor screen placed as a centerpiece of the stage that functions both as lighting and a title billboard to identify the location. The stage revolves around one chair and a table that is used for various purposes in different time and setting. Accordingly, this is so that it reflects the tension in the political realm of the Australian society in the eighties, where power corrupts and the working class are undermined, focusing more on the dialogue of conflicting ideology rather than in the detail of the props. Additionally, an element of proxemics was also evident in the unique design of the stage in which it was set up as a thrust stage, with a three-sided playing arena, along with the exit wing being the down right center of the stage. The stage provided the actors to have several scenes that are mainly in the downstage, which increased proximity with the audience.
The scenes consist of the many techniques mentioned above, there are two main characters are shown and the play is set in contrasting between the past and the present. There are two real locations that are the TV studio and Melbourne hotel, however the interplay of the techniques in the scenes works together to create a wartime setting. The audience awareness is developed through the historical information from each scene. Theatrical devices a re combined to create various features and have a great dramatic impact. The structure promotes the audience to watch the play because the structure of this storyboard is contrasted between the past and present that will attract audience attention, as it is an historical play set between different times.
This scene is dramatic, because on the left side of the screen Platt plays the violin vigorously, in the center Mr. Ford stands, and on the right side there are a few slaves, who remain emotionless. However, by centering Mr. Ford in the frame and blurring out the sides, it is able to draw attention to every movement and expression of his body and
Although the play and movie have differences at the beginning they also have similarities.
While both stage and screen portrayals were highly acclaimed there are some similarities as well as some marked differences in each interpretation. On the surface, the first difference noted between the stage and screen versions are the sets. The stage version describes the setting of the play, the Younger family living room, as a
These representations are essential in creating an entertaining performance to shape the overall dramatic meaning. An example found consecutively in the performance is Brechtian sign posting. Key words and dates are clearly painted on the walls by actors to express the play as educational by presenting historical facts. Later in the performance the walls are whitewashed therefore symbolising the indigenous involvement that had been lost. Contradicting this, a flame is positioned stage right to symbolise the Australian war memorial, the Eternal Flame.
The stage design gives the impression of the characters being in two separate rooms, the positioning of blocks and pillars helps again to demonstrate this. This intricate attention to detail enables the performance to be compared so similarly to the movie adaptation of Shakespeare’s classic, although the ‘big screen’ enables more room for a fast change in setting and shots, Rourke does a phenomenal job trying to create this illusion which works so brilliantly. The night before the wedding or you could refer to it as the ‘stag and hen do’ was an unexpected twist that the audience definitely did not see coming. Again, the revolving stage was used to represent the divide between the women and the men and to compensate for the lack of space that the stage could carry.
The most obvious prop was the implementation of the two giant screens placed on the ends of the stage. During every scene the screens would consistently change their projection in order to give off the effect of a complete background for the audience to experience. For example, towards the end of Act One, where Igor, Frederick and Inga were in his Transylvania residence, the giant screens projected static images of castle walls in order for the audience to feel like they were almost in an actual castle. In order to meet the demands for constant stage changes, some scenery props would be outfitted with wheels in order to quickly and silently change scenes. Then there was the actual interaction with the props, such as during the scene “Join The Family Business”, where Frederick and Inga would interact with a moving bookshelf which gave the audience some more insight about Inga and Frederick.
The movie follows the same storyline as the play, but it puts major scenes in different locations than what was originally written in the play. One major part of the story is when Lena (Mama) gives Walter the remaining money from the insurance check. In the movie this happens in The Green Hat bar. In contrast, this moment happens in the apartment in the play version. “(She goes out, and WALTER sits looking at the money on the table.
The beginning of the film is written out like the play but offers time and visuals for the reader to appreciate the scenes being shown. Kurzel adds the burial scene to start the film but there is no speaking among the characters, only music being played and also in the battle scene that is shown right after. I think that the silence between characters in these two scenes is what makes them so great. The battle scene is magnified in the film because of the music and seeing all of the gore and debris, like mud and swords being swung in super slow motion adds tension and really opens the viewers eyes as to how simple changes or add-ons can change the whole experience or mood of the piece.
In the book, the story starts when Elizabeth is in Italy having dinner with Giovanni, an Italian guy. It starts in the middle of the scene without a previous information or context. On the other hand, in the movie, Elizabeth is in Bali looking for an old medicine man to write an article on him. It starts in a smooth way that allows the spectator to acclimate in the story before it really starts. One could see that these events have nothing in common.
Baz Luhrmann is widely acknowledged for his Red Curtain Trilogy which are films aimed at heightening an artificial nature and for engaging the audience. Through an examination of the films Romeo + Juliet, Moulin Rouge and The Great Gatsby, the evolution and adaptation of his techniques become evident. Luhrmann’s belief in a ‘theatrical cinema’ can be observed to varying degrees through the three films and his choice to employ cinematic techniques such as self-reflexivity, pastiche and hyperbolic hyperbole. The cinematic technique of self-reflexivity allows a film to draw attention to itself as ‘not about naturalism’ and asks the audience to suspend their disbelief and believe in the fictional construct of the film.
The stage directions are not so descriptive. The setting is described in two lines and the characters are little described. They are limited to describe the actions of the characters. There are sound effects such as the bell that sounds at the end of the play and lightning effects such as the fade out that occurs at the end of each