Grady Cleveland 502 S. 5th St. Eldridge, IA 52748 May 15, 2023 Scott County Courthouse 400 W. 4th St. Davenport, IA 52801 Dear Jury Members: Mr. Bennet should be found not guilty because there is reasonable doubt. Although the prosecution claims he is guilty, they are wrong because the rat poison is only available to exterminators and Mr. Alfaro is one, Mrs. Reid thought that she would inherit his wealth, and Mr. Adams has bad eyesight. My first reason is, Mr. Alfaro is an exterminator and the rat poison is only available to exterminators. Mr. Alfaro is an exterminator and the rat poison was only available to exterminators. Mr. Alfaro’s fingerprints were found on the cup, and he had poured the cup. Mr. Alfaro was invited to the party by …show more content…
Reid thought that if Mr. Adams died, then because she is the only one in his family she would inherit the wealth. Mrs. Reid believed that if Mr. Adams were to die, then she would inherit his wealth. Mrs. Reid had a history of spreading rumors about Mr. Adams. Mrs. Reid invited Mr. Alfaro to the party and they were seen whispering throughout the night. Mrs. Reid has a reason to kill Mr. Adams for his wealth, and she had an exterminator with her that can handle the rat poison. Finally, Mr. Adams might have killed himself by accident because he has bad eyesight. Mrs. Swanson said that Mr. Adams had bad eyesight, and had trouble reading labels. The box of rat poison was found right next to where the sugar was. If Mr. Adams had a hard time seeing the labels then that means he could have misread the label on the rat poison and chose it instead of the sugar. The reasons and evidence all conclude that Mr. Bennet did not murder Mr. Adams. Mr. Alfaro is an exterminator and the rat poison is only available to exterminators, Mrs. Reid thought if Mr. Adams died then she would have all the money he owned and his new mansion, and Mr. Adams could have killed himself because of his bad eyesight. I urge you to find that the defendant, Mr. Bennet, should be found not
Prideful blood In the Adnan syed case, it is clear that syed is guilty due to the cell phone records and the testimony of Pusateri,wilds and McClain letter. Although many may believe Adnan Syed is not responsible, in actuality he is liable for his crimes. The cell phone records provided by AT&T, Which was requested by the police, demonstrate clear evidence of Syed being guilty.
Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, appellant, Robert Eugene Caldwell (“Caldwell”), was convicted of two counts of conspiracy to commit second-degree burglary. The jury, however, acquitted Caldwell of seven other charges. For each of Caldwell’s conspiracy convictions, he received 15 years’ incarceration with all but five years suspended, and five years of supervised probation. On appeal, Caldwell presents three issues for our review, which we rephrase and reorder as follows: 1. Whether the circuit court erred in denying Caldwell’s motions for a mistrial.
Guilty or not we see multiple people at the CSI: Crime Scene Investigation in the “Ending Happy.” Lorenzo ‘Happy’ Morales, the victim, was a middleweight boxer who had rough times and now fallen all the way down ending up at Binky’s Sugar Cane Ranch. Where there were multiple conditions contributing but not related to the immediate cause of the dead of Morales, some including contusion, BFT-crowbar, trachea punctures, crossbow, anaphylaxis, shellfish, urethra – P.O.E. and genitals distended. Yet not the cause of Morales death, there are still people to prosecute for the attempting murder. As the evidence reveals that Connor Foster and Dreama are found equally guilty for attempting murder and that my clients; Doris and George Babinkian are not
Dear Jury Members: Mr. Bennett should not be found guilty of murder because there is reasonable doubt. Although the Prosecution claims he is guilty, they are wrong because, Mr. Bennett while checking Mr Adam's pulse touch the spilled coffee, that Mrs. Ried would inherit the house and Mr. Alfoaro has rat poison, and Mr Adams had poor eyesight. First, Mr. Bennett went to go check his pulse to see if he was dead and touched the spilled coffee in the process. Mr. Bennett told the authorities that he touched the puddle of spilled coffee when he knelt by Mr. Adams when he was checking his pulse.
Dear Jury Members: In my opinion, David Eldiridge should be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder. Although the defense claims that he is innocent of this crime, they are incorrect because Eldridge had motive to kill Mr. Armes, there was no sign of a break-in, but all the money was gone and he had the key, and lastly, a witness had placed him at the scene near the time of the murder and his footprints were all around the body. First, David Eldridge had the motive to kill Mr. Armes because he was very angry after Mr. Armes hadn’t given him a raise and he needed money because the bank was going to repossess his house, so he could have stolen the recipe and robbed him to get the money. David was the only one that could get into the restaurant and rob Mr. Armes since he has the keys and the combo to the safe.
Five percent of U.S citizens have been wrongfully convicted. The book “Monster” written by Walter Dean Myers is about Steve who is on trail for a murder that he didn’t commit. There is agreeance with the jury that Steve isn’t guilty because there is a lack of evidence of his involvement and it is inferred that Steve doesn’t have a criminal record. To begin with, there was a lack of evidence of Steve’s involvement. The author wrote “one of the men arguing she points to King”(Myers 114).
Dear Jury Members:Mr.Bennett should not be found not guilty of murder because reasonable doubt is found. Although the prosecution thinks that Mr.Bennet is guilty for murder, they are wrong because since Mr.Alfario is an exterminator he had access to the poison that killed Mr.Adams, Mrs.Reid thought that when Mr.Adams died that she would inherit all his wealth, and the reason Mr. Bennett had poison on his hands because he had touched the puddle of coffee while checking Mr.Adams pulse on accident. To begin, Mr Bennett is not guilty because Mr Alfario had access to the poison, the same poison that killed Mr.adams. The police found out that Mr.Adams had died from rat poisoning and a coffee cup was found by Mr.Adams’s dead body, the cup contained rat poison.
Boblit and Brady were arrested and charged with murder in the first degree. In court Brady stated that although he was an accomplice to the murder he had nothing to do with the physical act of murdering the victim. He testified that Boblit was the one responsible for the horrendous act of murder. Brady’s lawyer tried to defend him to the best of it ability so upon trial his lawyer obtained the sworn testimony of Boblit but a specific part of his testimony was never admitted into court. There was never a fact of omission of guilt admitted on the record by Boblit coping to murder even though his sworn statement admitting to the murders was on July 9,1958.
The innocence of Sacco-Vanzetti Sacco And Vanzetti were accused of a murder they did not take part in. Sacco and Vanzetti were both Italian Immigrants. They both were charged with the murder of 2 paymasters. The jury and the judge were both against Sacco-Vanzetti because the victims were described as 2 italian immigrants that’s what made the case more sad. What made it more sadder, they were both put to death
The first bit of evidence that convicted Tod Willingham of arson was the fire allegations. They were unjustified and used outdated information to prosecute Tod. A study was done by professional arsonist John Letini and Dr. Hurst showing how the fire department’s report was false. “That in and of itself is enough to toss a case out for arson. ”-John
Anthony Graves eventually filed a grievance against former prosecutor Charles Sebesta for misconduct against Graves during his trial. It was discovered that Sebesta withheld evidence and used false testimony to win the capital murder case against Anthony Graves. Another man connected to Anthony’s case Robert
Although the prosecution claims he is guilty they are wrong because Mr. Alfaro is a exterminator who was seen around Mr. Adams drink, Mr. Mack had a motive to kill, and Mrs. Reid was a close relative and believed she would inherit his wealth. The strongest reason in this case is that Mr. Alfaro is an exterminator who deals with rat poison and was seen pouring Mr. Adams a drink 5 minutes before he died. It was noted that the rat poison found in Mr. Adams drink was only accessible for exterminators and Mr. Alfaro was an exterminator. In addition, the police officer and the coroner determined that the cause of death was rat poison.
Davis ' main question with all the story is to answer what happened, and possibly explain why the people did what they did. People do not run away without reason and motivation. People do not take another person 's life without a reason and motivation. Davis says at the end of her introduction “What I offer you here is in part my invention, but held tightly in check by the voices of the past”. Davis does not have a lot to go off when it comes to personal lives.
However, the two murderers never took the time to find out more about the Clutter family. Once they realized there was no fortune, Dick did not mind. Dick’s motive for remaining inside the Clutter home was he knew there was a young girl living in the house. His motive was to rape the young girl, Nancy. Nonetheless, the other murderer, Perry Smith, had no motive for killing the Clutter family after realizing there was no fortune.
In order to get rid of the rats they used rat poison and when they would get the meat there was dead rats in there as well their poison and they would drag the meat on the ground