Recently our class got a chance for an exclusive interview with our writing teacher, Mr. Ezzard. In the interview we asked a series of important questions, mostly geared towards his past experiences and life choices. We were able to get a better understanding of him with the answers we received.
We began the interview with a monumental question. We asked "When did you meet your wife and how?" Mr. Ezzard claims that he met his wife in 1993 in Boston. He was trying to become a new initiate in the Peace Corp. He went to an interview to see if he was cut out for the job and his soon-to-be wife was the interviewer. The interview went very well and he was accepted into the roster of all the others that were trying to join at the time. As he spoke to her, he fell in love. Every once in a while, he would call her and ask if he had been officially accepted. She said not yet, then he would ask if she would like to go out for lunch. She said no once again. This process repeated for quite some time. Finally one day he called and he had been accepted. He then asked if she wanted to have
…show more content…
When he writes, he is inspired by many different things. He gets inspiration from art, old photos, researching, stories on the news, music, sounds, and traveling to new places and discovering their culture. He also is inspired to write by "weird reality". Weird reality is strange things or creatures in life. One example of weird reality that he spoke of is the Mud Skipper. The Mud Skipper is a type of fish that lives in the rainforest. It has the ability to travel on land by using its strong fins as limbs to propel itself across the land. It has "lungs" where it stores water like oxygen and it can even climb trees by using the suction cup on its stomach. Strange creatures like this inspire him to write stories featuring them because of their
His writing is simple and direct, which makes the events he describes all the more scary as he successfully gets his point across. His tone is very gloomy and reflective, which reflects the seriousness of the story. He also uses symbolism and metaphor to get his message across, such as the image of darkness representing the evil and brutality of the Nazis. "I had ceased to pray. How I sympathized with Job!
He exaggerates certain aspects of his story to make them more entertaining and engaging. For example, he writes about a student who was "so fat he could barely fit in the chair," and another student who "had buck teeth big enough to hold a canoe. " These exaggerated descriptions create a humorous image in the reader's mind and help to lighten the mood of the
It was considered inappropriate for men to get permission to “call” on his lover. Because “calling” took place in the women’s house under the supervision of her parents, the household was more of a women’s domain. When the lady chose the gentlemen of her dream, he was allowed to give her a present such as a gift of flowers. In response, the lady wrote greeting cards and sent gifts to express her affection.
Stephen King uses multiple literary devices in his novel On Writing to convey the feel of a fictional novel, though it is based on facts from his life. King effectively uses these devices to convey his theme of persevering through adversity to become a greater writer and person. A major technique used in his writing is imagery that comes in many forms, precisely in this passage. There was a sharp smell of alcohol. A clank as the ear doctor opened his sterilizer.
He makes great use of simile and metaphor in this book. For example, when he is talking about being so close up to a dramatic game he says “It was one of those moments when Brian felt as if baseball was close enough for him to reach out and touch. Like his hands were around the handle of a
Author’s lives inspire their writing in many ways. An illustrious writer, Edgar Allan Poe, experienced continuous sufferings throughout his life. The heartaches he faced transferred into his writing. Poe’s works are dark and traumatic, such as “The Pit and the Pendulum.” He uses the unthinkable and shapes short stories out of them.
She kissed his mouth. He touched her face. She said please come back. He said I’ll see you tonight.” (285).
David Wiesner’s unorthodox way of creating imaginative literature is incredible. The creative processes in which he uses to construct these masterful wordless or almost wordless stories is nothing sort of amazing. Wiesner starts with rough sketches using pencil, colored pencils, acrylics, watercolors, and clay models. As he’s creating characters, the story line starts to come alive! He continues to work countless hours on drawings/paintings for himself and other children’s book
When ever she would look or glance towards him he would do something to impress her. One time when she looked over at him and he climbed up onto his diving board and did his best back tuck he could do just to get her attention. Another reason why he could possibly pick her is he thinks
He uses clear and suggestive language to describe the sights, sounds, and sensations of the storm. These descriptions help to grab the reader into the scene and give us a heightened
Sherman Alexie uses metaphor to explain how his childhood was and his life as a young indian boy on a small rez where everyone was stupid, but he had different views about life and knew he was
As I reading the excerpt, I was impressed by his wonderful writing skill and by how books influenced him like everybody who had read it. Two literary techniques that he used in the excerpt impressed the readers. He used
She storms off. John follows her to a club. He proposes. The clock strikes midnight. They kiss.
Doyle was greatly influenced by his childhood turning him to the author he has become now.. Doyle’s style of writing represented how influenced Doyle became from other works from authors he was inspired by. The different books that Doyle wrote
Since these creators are the source of the idolization of nature, she writes to them in order to reverse their misconception. Oates realizes that their subject is not the authentic force, but rather one that was handed endless meaning by artisans. She addresses them mockingly, utilizing rhetorical questions as a way to aggravate their thought process. Including herself in the audience of authors, she toys with the image of authors and jokes that the reason they write so profusely on nature is that “...we must, we’re writers, poets, mystics (of a sort) aren’t we, precisely what else are we to do but glamorize and romanticize and generally exaggerate the significance of anything we focus the white heat of our “creativity” upon?” (Oates 226).