Mr. Michelson's Argumentative Analysis
Objections that the prosecution and/or defense should have been made. On page 1, line 22 the objection would be that under Federal Rule of Evidence Rules 405(a) and 608(a). There can only be testimony as to a point of view or the character and not testimony in support of the point of view. Leading to the questioning of the witness to his point of view, of his reputation is the witness' statement of the point of view that is not permitted. On page 2, lines 12 and 13 with reference to the statement of the witness with respect to Mr. Michelson's “reputation is very good in the community...who will never start an argument and never hold a grudge against anyone”; Federal Rule of Evidence Rules 405(a) and 608(a). There can only be testimony as to a point of view or the character and not testimony in support of the point of view. The witness' declaration is testimony to prove the Mr. Michelson had a good name in the community. That testimony is not permitted. Federal Rule of Evidence Rule 401(a) shows also that it would be immaterial as Mr. Michelson was arraigned with the crime of bribery and not provoking altercations or having ill will is not relevant to the bribery that Mr. Michelson had been charged. Under cross-examination on page 2, line 22 that under Federal Rule of Evidence Rule 404(b) “That evidence …show more content…
Michelson was always within the law. Federal Rule of Evidence Rule 613(b), it is permitted as “extrinsic evidence of a witness's prior inconsistent statement is admissible only.” That the witness professed that Mr. Michelson was always acting within the law, although he was once charged with smoking marijuana. The witness overstepped his bounds in his assessment of Mr. Michelson. On page 3, line 1, that it was claimed that Mr. Michelson committed a crime but was found to be not guilty. In despite that, Mr. Michelson's arrest could have damaged his good standing within his
Gengal V Hogan Summary
123 Words | 1 PagesIn another way, the court case of Mallory v. Hogan is the right against self-incrimination in the fifth Amendment. William Mallory was found guilty and sentenced to jail with a fine. But, it was suspended and the court placed him on two years probation. However, within the time period of the probation, the Superior Court "appointed referee ordered Malloy to testify about gambling and other criminal activities in Hartford County." Mallory refused to incriminate himself and he was imprison for contempt the court and held until he willing to confess himself.
Examples Of Vera's Statement Of Hearsay
753 Words | 4 PagesAccording to the FRE, if a declarant makes a statement against his interest, such as an admission of guilt of the matter at hand, that statement is admissible. Unlike other cases of declarations against interest, the declarant in this situation need not be unavailable. Here, according to Molly’s notes, Paul admitted that he was driving too fast and that the accident was his fault. Paul’s admission of guilt is not hearsay and is admissible as an evidence against
Rock V. Arkansas Case Study
507 Words | 3 PagesRock v. Arkansas was a case, which took place in 1983. The defendant, Vickie Lorene Rock, was charged with manslaughter. She was convicted of killing her husband in July 1983. The defendant was unable to remember everything that had happened the night of her husbands killing.
Case Study Of Bernard And Babette Butkis Testimony
691 Words | 3 PagesBernard and Babette Butkis Testimony Bernard and Babette Buskins present a plethora of potential wrong doings by a third party in this case their employer Richard A. Ryound. Dissecting the Butkis’s testimony allows for a one sided, well determined completion of arguments in favor and against their testimony. Beginning with their posture in their initial statement, creating a comprehensive objective argument, and effectively determining the outcome of the case through civil court action. Bernard and Babette Buskins present several factual realities that affected their life directly.
Hae Min Lee Cold Blooded Murder Analysis
1095 Words | 5 PagesJay’s statements should not have been used in court
Defendant Case Summary
91 Words | 1 PagesShould the court allow Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence, § 710.20 (3), for the confession of possessing cocaine as the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution disallows a Defendant to forcibly witness against themselves in a criminal case, even if the totality of the circumstances rule finds that the confession was voluntary due to the police conducting the interrogation without coercive methods or promises of immunity, the reasonable length of the interrogation and opportunity for counsel to Defendant, and the characteristics of the accused providing substantial methods against police
Acetone Case Study
1504 Words | 7 PagesSpecial Agent Masters gave hearsay testimony about him being happy that burned to the ground. However, these Should have not been admissible under the Federal rule 801 through 807 state is not admissible unless any of the following provides otherwise the federal statute missile or other were prescribed by the Supreme Court. The statements that declared did not make while testifying in a current trial or hearing and a party off of evidence to provide the truth of the matter of rest and statements. Therefore, his statement to the special investigator about how happy was Chemical plant burn to the ground as inadmissible because it was done During interrogation Preceding
Hancock V. Karpinski's Case
740 Words | 3 PagesSimilarly, Karpinski was fired from the school district, where he was employed as a school driver. In Hancock, and the court concluded that statements by Defendant were not a slander per se because they did not ascribe the lack of necessary skills that were required in Plaintiff’s profession. In Karpinski’s case, statements by Moore, although negatively reflected on his character, accusing him of dishonesty does not reflect negatively on his skills and essential ability necessary for a bus driver. Based on this analysis we can assume
Rodney King Case Study
932 Words | 4 Pagesbetween he, the judge, and the other lawyers due to the fact that Stone’s law partner was representing Sargent Koon in a related civil issue. They believed his loyalty was divided. It was later noted that the defendants tried to convince the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals that they were improperly convicted; because of the accusations the prosecutors did ask the court to possibly reconsider the Los Angeles Police officers ' sentences, however, the government felt that would be too easy for the damages the officers caused on that unforgettable night. Asking for a new appeal, was really asking for a number of issues to arise. Any expert in law could see that the defense argument will rest largely on the prosecution 's use of the videotaped testimony by Officer Theodore J. Briseno.
Argumentative Essay On Jay Kiral
1015 Words | 5 PagesJay’s statement is different than Jenn’s that who arrived first to Jenn’s house. Simpson writes that Jay mentions in his first interview that he arrived at 12:30 p.m. and Jenn arrived at 1:30 p.m. Then, Jenn’s statements do not line up with Jay’s, she claims that she arrived at 12:30 p.m., and Jay arrived at 1:30 p.m. (“Simpson”). These are two different stories that do not match with each other and shows someone did lied. Another fact, when Jay tells a big lie at the trial to fit his story with Jenn’s, He entirely tells a new story.
Analysis Of The Kelly Cashman Vs. California Court Case
720 Words | 3 PagesThe present report has been prepared by myself Guadalupe Centeno on the basis of my observations carried out on March 27, 2018, at the Larson Justice Center during the Kelly Cashman VS California court case. This court case trial is being executed since the party Kelly Cashman is being charged with a DUI. The prosecutor is the attorney named Sara Beller, the defense attorney’s name is Mr. Miller, and the judge was named Otis Sterling. During this court case, two witnesses named Christine Rosas and Holy Sanchez. Christine Rosas presented her testimony and three pieces of evidence, while Holy Sanchez also presented her testimony and one piece of evidence.
Inadmissible Evidence: Case Study
1656 Words | 7 Pages“Think of the original piece of evidence as being like an apple tree. Because it was illegally planted, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, any fruit that comes from it is also illegal, as well” (Shein, 2016, para. 5). The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine is applicable for both evidence and witnesses that would not have been found otherwise, as well as a confession obtained following the seizure of tainted evidence (Gardner & Anderson, 2015). An example of how this
Legal Case Study Of Frost's Case
885 Words | 4 PagesThe basis for a retrial rested on several issues found throughout the original trial. Although being charged with a capital offense, Mr. Burrell was appointed a lawyer with no capital offense experience in a court. The conviction of Mr. Burrell was based solely off of witnesses who had personal motives to testify against him, one being his ex-wife, who wanted custody of their child. The jury was “unaware” any of the witnesses who testified at trial had any personal issues against Mr. Burrell. The link of physical evidence between Mr. Burrell and the crime was non-existent.
Essay On Misrepresentation And Concealment Of Evidence
1929 Words | 8 PagesSection 191 Giving false evidence: Whoever, being legally bound by an oath or by an express provision of law to state the truth, or being bound by law to make a declaration upon any subject, makes any statement which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false or does not believe to be true, is said to give false evidence. Section 192 fabricating false evidence: Whoever causes any circumstance to exist or makes any false entry in any book or record, or makes any document containing a false statement, intending that such circumstance, false entry or false statement may appear in evidence in a judicial proceeding, or in a proceeding taken by law before a public servant as such, or before an arbitrator, and that such circumstance, false entry or false statement, so appearing in evidence, may cause any person who in such proceeding is to form an opinion upon the evidence, to entertain an erroneous opinion touching any point material to the result of such proceeding, is said "to fabricate false
Legal Burden Of Proof
2248 Words | 9 PagesQuestion 1 (1) The burden of proof means obligation to prove. There are two principle kinds of burden in legal trial; they are • legal burden • evidential burden. Legal Burden The legal burden can be defined as the obligation imposed on a party by a rule of law to prove a fact in issue in order to convince the court.
More about Mr. Michelson's Argumentative Analysis
Gengal V Hogan Summary
123 Words | 1 PagesExamples Of Vera's Statement Of Hearsay
753 Words | 4 PagesRock V. Arkansas Case Study
507 Words | 3 PagesCase Study Of Bernard And Babette Butkis Testimony
691 Words | 3 PagesHae Min Lee Cold Blooded Murder Analysis
1095 Words | 5 PagesDefendant Case Summary
91 Words | 1 PagesAcetone Case Study
1504 Words | 7 PagesHancock V. Karpinski's Case
740 Words | 3 PagesRodney King Case Study
932 Words | 4 PagesArgumentative Essay On Jay Kiral
1015 Words | 5 PagesAnalysis Of The Kelly Cashman Vs. California Court Case
720 Words | 3 PagesInadmissible Evidence: Case Study
1656 Words | 7 PagesLegal Case Study Of Frost's Case
885 Words | 4 PagesEssay On Misrepresentation And Concealment Of Evidence
1929 Words | 8 PagesLegal Burden Of Proof
2248 Words | 9 Pages