Multilingual Speech Analysis using Capstrum Coefficient features for text-dependent Speaker Identification System
Vinay Kumar Jain1, Dr.(Mrs.) Neeta Tripathi2
1Research Scholar SSTC(SSGI), Bhilai, India vinayrich_17@yahoo.co.in 2Principal, SSTC (SSEC), Bhilai, India neeta31dec@rediffmail.com Abstract— The demand for multilingual speaker identification system increases for countries like India where many people are able to speak more than one language. The Capstrum coefficient features analysis is important for observe the overall performance of the multilingual speaker identification system. The objective of the research work is to use Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) and Gammatone Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (GFCC) as feature components for the identification of a multilingual speaker. A model is proposed to identify the speaker by multi language speech signal of a speaker using MFCC ,delta-MFCCs and GFCC as acoustic features. For training and testing, neural network is used using resilient back propagation algorithm and radial basis functions and results are compared. The speech samples are recorded in three different languages Hindi, Marathi and Rajasthani. The extracted features of the speech signals of multiple languages are observed. In this experiment accuracy
…show more content…
In India there are many peoples who are able to speak more than one language. Therefore there is a need to identify the effect of languages on a multilingual speaker identification system. When the Multilingual speaker identification system is being transferred to real applications, the need for greater adaptation in identification is required[13]. The performance of the monolingual speaker identification systems tends to decreases when speaker is speaking in another language. Therefore there is a need to make such systems which can work for multiple
Overall, copper had the best precision and this again was known by examining the standard deviation. A t-test
Calculation: Initial Mass(g)-Final Mass (g)=Change in Mass (g) Trial 1 74.5-62.0=12.5(g) Trial 2 272.7-271.5=1.2(g) Percent Error: 272.7-271.5 x 100 272.7 =0.440% Percent Change: 74.5-62.0 x 100 74.5 (Trial 1) =16.778% 272.7-271.5 x 100 272.7 (Trial 2) =0.440%
Comparing Speeches Many civil rights leaders have spoken out about their controversial views of how to address injustices. For instance, during the Civil Right Movement, Kathie Amatniek and Harvey Milk both spoke to voice that their societies that are directing injustices towards gays and women. Using pathos and metaphors, Amatniek wants America to rid of traditional views of gender. Meanwhile, Harvey Milk uses using pathos, diction and humor to connect with his mainly homophobic audience to abolish the negative stereotypes of gays.
All the experiment was depending on fortune and luck and can not be successful at all because the performers do not have proper direction to perform the experiment. For the experiment, workers should have proper equipment, standardise and should have power to do work their own way. It is also concluded that the quality of production might be great in future by use the present statics and create a quality control chart and solve the problem in specific problems which effects the project. The common wisdom is that if only people did not make so many mistakes, there would not be so many problems. But even with the variation contributed by the people reduced to zero, there are still too many red
This was done to get more accurate results. The first time the experiment was conducted it was tested at three different time points, at zero minutes, fifteen minutes and
Elie Wiesel was a motivational holocaust survivor, and a human rights activist who won the Noble Peace prize. During World War Two Elie Wiesel and his family was captured by the Nazi soldiers and sent the concentration camps. At some point in the concentration camp he lost both of his parents and sister. They were put in the crematorium. They were only being punished for being what they are.
Out of Breath Becoming accustomed to a new language is difficult, especially when it is not one’s primary language. Amy Tan, the author of “Mother Tongue” went through this same situation. Tan’s mother had a hard time with the way she spoke English because no one seemed to understand what she wanted to convey. Amy Tan uses her story as a way to let the audience know about how language can lead people to be prejudice, connect people, change perception and open new doors in life.
In this lab there were five different stations. For the first station we had to determine an unknown mass and the percent difference. To find the unknown mass we set up the equation Fleft*dleft = Fright*dright. We then substituted in the values (26.05 N * 41cm = 34cm * x N) and solved for Fright to get (320.5g). To determine the percent difference we used the formula Abs[((Value 1 - Value 2) / average of 1 & 2) * 100], substituted the values (Abs[((320.5 - 315.8) /
3. In this experiment, the percent yield was 90%. This number implies that there was little error in this experiment. However, this result could have been caused by certain external factors.
On the 27th of October in 1964, Ronald Reagan gave a speech called “A Time for Choosing” on behalf of Barry Goldwater. His speech was so popular that it is also known as “The Speech”. Afterwards, Ronald Reagan ,also known as The Great Communicator, was thought of by many people as a great political speaker. This speech was given to endorse the Goldwater campaign, even though Goldwater lost the election. The Speech launched Reagan’s political career into action and he later went on to be the Californian governor and President of the United States.
However, any doubts regarding the results may be traced to a few elements of the experiment that lend themselves to possible error. The following factors may have contributed to potential errors in the experiment; the need to zero the machine between each of the readings in obtaining the absorption spectrum and the resulting peak wavelength, the precision with which a person can accurately adjust the needle on the spectrophotometer to zero is limited, not putting in the inaccurate amount of cobalt chloride or water into the substance, and getting oil from our fingers onto the
The article 'Mother Tongue ' by author Amy Tan is about the variations in the English language the author uses in her life. She describes her English when giving a speech to a other people, English she uses when speaking to her mother, and English she uses in her writing. She tells of difficulties faced by both her mother and herself from these many differences. Amy 's goal in this article is to show that a person does not have to speak proper English to be seen as smart or intelligent.
The actual data is the result on our experiment vs theoretical, which is based on the calculations above. I have also learned to pay more attention to draining out all of the product completely before continuing to test the experiment, as any small drop of contaminant can veer our results into a different
Due to the unaccountability of the inconsistency in droplet size, many of the numbers may be varied because in one trial a huge droplet may count as one, but in another trial, I may have counted a small droplet as one, which causes results to possibly be
The mass of vinegar used during the experiment was 4.108 grams. It was determined that there were .003129 moles of CH3COOH in the vinegar sample. Using this information and the molar mass of CH3COOH, which was 60.05 g/mol, the mass of acetic acid in the vinegar was calculated: 4.Vinegar is a 5% aqueous solution of acetic acid. Since the mass of acetic acid within the vinegar was calculated as .18789 g in step 3, the percent of CH3COOH was calculated using the following equation: To calculate the percent error, the experimental value of 4.5% acetic acid in vinegar was subtracted by the theoretical value of 5% and divided by 5% to yield a percent error of 8.54%. The following is a copy of the calculations done using decimals: 5.The equivalence point of the titration curve measured in step 1 was 25.25 mL of NaOH.