Multimodal Discourse Analysis

3190 Words13 Pages
Discourse analysis is a branch of linguistics and it is the study of the language found in texts, with the consideration of in which situation it is used, whether it is a cultural or social context. It is the study of language, whether it is written or spoken. The study of language can be divided into three ways, which are “language beyond the level of a sentence, language behaviors linked to social practices and language as a system of thoughts”. Discourse analysis depends on analyzing the language, in order to understand the apparent meaning and the out of sight meaning from a particular text. Although the same language is used in different situations, it gives different meanings, and that is where discourse analysis plays its role. This…show more content…
Multimodal is “the use of words with pictures, videos, sounds and films”. The multimodal discourse always features what is shown on the television. Its usage make people engage more in events. The multimodal discourse analysis is derived from the Halliday’s social semiotic approach. Its purpose is to analyze the social semiotic situations, people get attracted to, such as films, images, TV programs and videos. Halliday’s consists of three functions, which are ideational “which is the main idea”, interpersonal “the relation between participants” and textual “how the message is organized”. There is a previous study about the multimodal social semiotics. It proves that social semiotics is a way to deal with correspondence that, tries to see how individuals impart by…show more content…
The ways of communication are what they are, not due to basics, principles and structures, but since of what they can achieve socially in ordinary instantiation. With this accentuation, a key inquiry is the way individuals make signs in the setting of interpersonal and institutional force relations to attain to particular points. This is in a general sense vital, since semiotic frameworks can shape social relations and society itself. One of the main keys of social semiotic hypothesis is, the rule that methods of correspondence offer generally particular and socially imparted alternatives (or 'semiotic assets') for conveying. The Investigation of correspondence from this viewpoint, tries to distinguish the semiotic choices that are accessible to communicators. These alternatives ought to be seen not as altered, but rather as having significance potential that is acknowledged in setting, and in mix with different decisions. This way, the implications connected with these choices is dependably in a methodology of progressing flux, as they are consistently adjusted to social experiences. According to multimodality, the suggestion is that all modes ought to be considered with a perspective to the basic decisions accessible to communicators, the significance possibilities of assets and the reasons for which they are picked. From a social semiotic viewpoint, this incorporates investigation of how communicators make writings and how
Open Document