“If you want to go quickly, go alone if you want to go far, go together.”
- An African proverb
Multinational operations are operations conducted by forces of two or more nations, usually undertaken within the structure of a coalition or alliance. There are numerous challenges, but tremendous opportunities to the US Geographical Combatant Commander (GCC) or Joint Task Force Commander (JTFC) who will exercise military power as a member of a multinational alliance or coalition, with interagency and intergovernmental partners. Future military engagement will be in the multinational environment because of the strength of both opposing forces depend on alliance and collation. The role of military leadership is to influence other to fulfill the mission
…show more content…
GCC/JTFC have the opportunity to integrate elements of national power of all allies and collation partners to generate greater combat power. Physical presence and the personal relation are very much essential to achieve synergy. Synergy must start to achieve from the environmental shaping phase. A continuous presence builds strong relationships and trust that produces greater actionable intelligence, commitments for basing and infrastructure, improved sustainment lay down, and coalition force commitments. Improvements are possible to create more synergy with the interagency. Security cooperation program is the starting points for the building the collation. Therefore GCC must shape their AOR through the coordinated security cooperation program during the peacetime to achieve better …show more content…
NATO is always on the top priorities of the US, but significant of Europe is declining compared with the Asian and African nations. In the changing scenario, GCC must prepare for robust shaping phase of operation with new partners.
• Establishment of ad hoc organization for to develop warfighting modalities. In the absence of multinational defense pacts in their respective AOR, GCC should create a multinational ad hoc organization (like pseudo-NATO type) in the respective AOR to develop doctrine, SOPs, ROEs, and staff system. It will also help to promote cultural awareness and language flow among collation partners.
• Every GCC must explore the opportunity to conduct multinational training and exercise as a method of understanding potential operational issues, strength, and weakness and likely area of improvement of respective partner countries, as a part of pre-conflict shaping. Similarly, multinational planning exercises would be a better way to identify emerging crises and better ways to handle such situations.
• Include allies and collation partners from the pre-conflict shaping phase. Shaping the environment or must be the start points of the MNF operation. Pre-conflict shaping will determine the success and failure of future
When operating with multinational forces a command structure is established to ensure balance and creditable with all military forces involved.
Conflict resolution in the United States may be achieved by the cooperation of states, opening up proper channels for information to flow, and through the prevention of Russia taking any further action which may cause harm. While the institutions and rules put into place do not explicitly assist states in achieving their respective self-interests, through cooperation these states, such as the United States, increase their security and chance of
Analyzing the mission command principles and the commanding officer’s actions will also be discussed. Specifically, as it relates to building a cohesive team through mutual trust, providing a clear commander’s intent, and accepting prudent risk. While the battle of Fort Riviere and the resulting occupation of Haiti occurred over a century ago, it provides us with an example of American foreign policy during this period and bares resemblance to future American military
General Petraeus and his Leadership Approach to Mosul A Leaders Restoration of a Nation Following the invasion of Coalition Forces into Iraq in March of 2003 the Army’s 101st Airborne Division, commanded by Major General David Petraeus, found itself in the Northern Iraqi city of Mosul (Lundberg, 2008). With the invasion complete and capturing of the capitol city of Baghdad accomplished, Major General Petraeus and staff began confronting the issues and concerns of what lay ahead for the duration of the unit’s deployment (Lundberg, 2008). The development and implementation of Major General David Petraeus’ strategy to bring stability to Mosul, Iraq and surrounding areas following the 2003 invasion provides insight into his leadership approach
“The evolving war in Afghanistan compelled CENTCOM to run a complex and growing operation from a long distance” (Kugler, Baranick, & Binnendijk, 2009, p. 8). The CFACC and CAOC headquarters operated from Saudi Arabia, not Afghanistan (Kugler et al, 2009, p. 8). GEN Franks utilized video conferencing to synchronize information flow between the Afghanistan, Gulf, and Florida regions. This led many in the AOR to believe that the Gulf located commands and Florida headquarters did not fully understand the situation on the
During Operation Husky, the Allies arguably achieved their operational objectives but failed to fully capitalize on the opportunities provided through the effective use of joint functions. This was most evident regarding command and control as well as the overall lack of integration of many of the remaining joint functions. The invasion of Sicily by the Allies was one of the largest and complex combined operations in WWII. Most historians posit that the operation was an Allied victory. Others argue that the Allies lacked clear strategic objectives and failed to establish effective command relationships.
Effective air and ground integration are required to be successful on the modern battlefield. This requires a great amount of coordination and understanding. There are certain fundamentals needed to increase the effectiveness between aviation and ground assets: Understanding of the capabilities and limitations of each force, use of standard operating procedures, regular training events, employment methods, maximizing effects of available assets and synchronization (Headquarters Department of the Army Field Manual (FM) 3-04.111, 2007). Honing these skills will occur very early on in the unit by involving the BAE in the planning and preparation process. Prior to any mission the BAE will provide critical guidance on a multitude of tasks, such as close air support (CAS) request procedures, coordination with the aviation task force, and employment advice and planning for attack elements, assault elements, heavy helicopters, medical evacuation (MEDEVAC) helicopters, and unmanned aerial systems(UAS).
GEF and JSCP guide the Geographic Combatant Commander in the development of Theater Strategy. The GEF signed by the President and issued by the Secretary of Defense provides political and military guidance in context of the National Defense Strategy and based on strategic goals of Combatant Commands which forms the basis of the Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan (JSCP). The JSCP issued to combatant commanders, service chiefs, Combat Support agencies, and other relevant DOD agencies and field offices by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). The JSCP provides functional planning guidance, contingency planning requirements to meet military objectives and outlines resource and force allocations and apportionments for each respective agency or command. The Theater Campaign Plans are then developed by the combatant commands using the GEF and JSCP as the higher headquarters guidance.
What are some of the challenges and operational requirements associated with the transition from a corps headquarters to a CFLCC headquarters? Under modularity, division and corps are designed to provide flexible command and control packages for the employment of land forces as part of a joint, and/or multinational and interagency force. Making the transition from G staff to a J staff is a significant problem-solving challenge. The operational requirements associated with the transition must generate an effective CFLCC headquarters that is capable of conducting rapid and thorough analysis, decision making, and product development. Organizing the staff by functional area rather than along traditional staff lines may immediately increase the
In this paper, I will juxtapose some of the characters in the book with the ARSOF imperatives - the guidelines SOF operators need to know, understand, and employ to achieve mission success when working in the joint, interagency, intergovernmental, and multinational (JIIM) environment, highlight the successes and shortcomings each person encountered, and discuss the
Operation Anaconda Joint Function Sergeant First Class Joel S. Johnson MLS 004-18 Joint Functions According to JP 3-0, Joint functions are related capabilities and activities placed into six basic groups of command and control, intelligence, fires, movement and maneuver, protection, and sustainment to help the Joint Forces Commander (JFC) synchronize, integrate, and direct joint operations (p.xiii). ADRP 3-0 states that the general term, joint operations, is military actions conducted by joint forces (JF) or by service forces employed under command relationships (p.1-6). Missteps made in the Joint Functions of command and control, intelligence, fires, movement and maneuver, protection, and sustainment may have been impossible to
Joint Planning for Operation Anaconda SFC Spurlock, Matthew MLC Class 005-18 Joint Planning for Operation Anaconda Since the beginning of the Global War on Terrorism, there have been numerous battles. One of the most important battles that shaped future joint planning of operations was Operation Anaconda. The outcome of this operation was ultimately successful, however, the original intent from the commanders were not met due to errors in the joint planning process. Joint planning during Operation Anaconda proved ineffective because of inaccurate intelligence about the terrain and weather, the exemption of Air Force and Navy during the initial planning phase, and false assumptions about the enemy. Intelligence Intelligence Preparation
The US military plays a major role in the defense system of the world. Their role can be in the form of military aid, deployment of the military and deployment of the Coast Guards and the protection of people’s lives and freedom. The US is well known for providing military aid to many different countries. The aim of military aid is usually to help allies or poor countries to fight terrorism, counter-insurgencies or to help fight drug wars.
Beyond Command and Control, the joint functions include intelligence, fires, movement and maneuver, protection, sustainment, and information. As the largest operation in WWII up until that time, Operation Husky was a proving ground for integration of joint function. Given the command and control struggles, it follows that joint integration in Operation Husky was less than optimal, especially because “joint force components have different function-oriented approaches, procedures, and perspectives.” Presented below are examples of how shortcomings in intelligence and movement and maneuver resulted in lost momentum or lost opportunity for the
Military leadership is the process of influencing others to accomplish the mission by providing purpose, direction, and motivation. Another significant aspect of emphasized by the army is charisma. Therefore, army strategy to have a great leader is to choose people with high charisma since follower are always drawn to leaders with charisma. By having a high charisma they can command the follower easily. The basic task of a leader are: achieve the mission with zero fatality.