There are multiple critical thinking issues that must be taken into account when it comes to socio-political events. Issues such as variables being measured correctly, representativeness and regression, and assuming a single explanation. Politically these affect our society because they ultimately can change the outcome of a situation. They also are used to help alter a person’s opinion and perspective.
One of the critical thinking issues is thinking about the variable being measured. Critically thinking about the variable in experiments help lessen confusion when variables are being compared. This section of the course also discusses relationships and people form an attraction for another person. the article “How Does Social Media Shape our Political Views,” it discusses how social media plays a positive and negative role in today’s society. It reads that living in a democracy people have the right to say however they feel and filter out the opposing side, especially in political reviews; People will agree with one side and completely miss out on someone else’s outlook on the situation. Social media influences are a pure example of the mere exposure effect. This effect brings forth the idea that repeated exposure of a person or item, results in liking the object more. The critical thinking issue can
…show more content…
Regression effect is used statistically for people to place values on one variable to be associated with less extreme values on the other. The article “The Know-Nothing Camus ‘Protest’ Movement” is about how a student is trying to fight against people protesting on her college campus. Being that regression is expected, the expectation of people being upset behind protestors should have been foreseen. Protestors protest because they disagree or are upset about a situation. Retaliation, especially from the opposing
A: Exposure to actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violence in (one or more) of the following: 1: Directly experiencing the traumatic event(S) 4: Experiencing repeated or exposure to aversive details of the traumatic event(S) B: Presence of one (or more) of the following intrusion symptoms associated with the traumatic event(S), beginning after the traumatic event(S) occurred: 1: Recurrent, involuntary, and intrusive distressing memories of the traumatic event(s) 3: Dissociative reactions in which individuals feels or acts as if the traumatic events were recurring C: Persistent avoidance of stimuli associated with the traumatic event(S) occurred, as evidenced by one or both of the following: 1: Avoidance of or efforts to avoid distressing memories,
Sunstein explains the spread of fake news through the studies of facebook users while Pitts uses personal experience to demonstrate the lack of critical thinking he sees through the eyes of responders to his
Truth or Tale The two articles “How Facebook Makes Us Dumber” and “When ears don’t hear, truth is futile” though different, both make a very similar argument. Each illustrate that people refuse to hear the truth, and instead trust the lies. The article, “When ears don’t hear, truth is futile” by Leonard Pitts, expresses that people will only listen to the information that appeases their already formed ideas.
According to a report by the Knight Foundation, 86% of college students believe that social media companies censor political views that they disagree with (Grimmer & Tucker, 2020). This is a concerning trend because it is leading to a lack of diversity of thought and ideas, which is essential for a healthy democracy. This technology addiction distracts people from reality and limits our ability to think. This excessive use of technology is a cause for concern because it is leading to a lack of meaningful human interaction and critical thinking. If America continues down this path, it may end up like the society depicted in Fahrenheit 451, where people are unable to think for
The discussion of polling techniques relates because poll representations categorize people as for or against something, even when some people have no opinion. This supports Fiorina’s opinion, “The simple truth is that there is no culture war in the United states…”. The discussion of political influence is relevant because everyone has different opinions about everything. The different opinions are based upon political influences the person has encountered throughout their life. The discussion of media types and power is important because media influences the opinion of the
1) Are any of the questions you are focused on in your life deep questions? Yes, the questions are very deep. 2) To what extent are you questioning you purpose and goals? It is to the point to where I feel like I am felling at achieving them.
Occasionally we all meet someone with contradicting view than ours, for it is in human nature to be in conflict. However, there are those occasions when someone’s views, whether they agree with the view held by one’s own opinion or not, are underdeveloped. They acquire what they read or see around them and take these as the only facts of the case. The opinions held are hardly their own, just fragmented compilations of others formed by the reported news on skewed media outlets. McCombs and Reynolds once reported in 2002 within an article on the influence news that, “News media may not be successful in telling people what to think, but they are stunning successful in telling them what to think about”.
After taking a week-long break from concentrating on my paper, reflecting on it revealed different aspects of my argument. First, one strength of my paper is my perspective. Although I am biased in assuming that the core requirements are beneficial, I support this claim with evidence. I do this through my credibility statement, "During the beginning of my freshman year, the abundance of core annoyed me; however, learning the intentions behind the stipulations led me to acceptance and understanding." Also, I try to relay to the audience Calvin 's reasoning behind the requirements.
McEntrye starts this section by explaining that writing is dependent on critical thinking and therefore, requires critical thinking strategies. She claims that if a writer is unable to state a thesis clearly, explain detail, give examples, or the create metaphors, analogies, or pictures to support. Then the writer doesn't know what they want to say, understand or connect with the topic. Then she goes on to give four exercises for a writer to attempt to see if they have a solid understand of their topic. When I began reading this I initially disagreed with McEntrye’s first statement “If we cannot accurately state our key idea in a sentence using our own words, we don’t really know what we want to say.
Think Question #1 Sydney Martin CMN 225: Communication in Place September, 19th, 2015 Innovation is a natural part of human society, without it the human species wouldn’t be where it is today. But, in order for an innovation to make a significant impact on society the innovation must be spread throughout the many different cultures and societies on earth. Everett Rogers and Malcolm Gladwell both studied they way innovations are spread. The theories while, forty years apart, essentially the same. Rogers defined diffusion as “…the process by which an innovation is communicated through certain channels over time among members of a social system…”
The main objectives in chapter 9 include the ways media attempt to influence people’s attitudes, beliefs, and/or behavior, ways media technology can be disruptive and have adverse effects on behavior, the positive and negative influences of certain kinds of media, such as advertisements or reality television programs, on self-image. Even though media is a great outlet, media has changed our generation causing effects on self-image and human interactions. Because of its pervasiveness in American culture, the media affects people in both obvious and subtle ways. Modern media comes in many different formats, including newspapers, magazines, television, social media, etc.
In 2007, CNN stated a word “Youtube-ification of politics” prepared for the U.S. Presidential Primaries (Youtube and Policits). However, the impact of social media on politics can be either positive or negative. Social media can have a positive impact on politics when it is used properly. As people mentioned that social media is a free platform for sharing information, a tool of freedom and empowerment and a door of equality.
For years people have played the “blame game” with media and its effects on society. It has been questioned whether the media helps or hurts more in its overall impacts. The media consists of magazines, advertisements, TV shows, and social pages such as Instagram, SnapChat, Twitter, and Facebook, all in which society seems to be addicted to. The real question is, is having all of these sources of media positively or negatively affecting society? Some people blame the media for harming society by causing eating disorders and a low self esteem.
Media are platforms of mass communication that can be categorized as either new of traditional media, with new media being forms of communication that make use of technologies such as the Internet, and traditional media being more conventional forms of media such as newspapers. Media, primarily new media, is getting more popular and influential, especially in today’s day and age since we are exposed to it a lot more than in the past and also since media is more easily accessible now. The media can shape our behaviours, perceptions and opinions, and it is important to know how people are influenced and impacted by it. The media can influence someone’s perception of social reality, or perceptions of beauty or even influence people’s behaviours and habits and therefore, the media does shape who we are. One way that the media can shape who we are is by influencing our perception of social reality.
The theory explains “how individuals use mass communication to gratify their needs” (Burgeon, Hunsaker and Dawson, 1994, cited in Udende and Azeez, 2010, p. 34). The theory holds that “people influence the effects that mass media have on them” (Anaeto et al, 2008 cited in Edegoh, Asemah and Nwammuo, 2013, p. 23). The assumption of the theory is that people are not just passive receivers of media messages; rather, they actively influence the message effects. Media audience selectively choose, attend to, perceive and retain media offerings on the basis of their needs, beliefs, etc., thus, “there are as many reasons for using the media as there are media users”