Objective To find who will be better at multitasking considering female and male, namely any relationship between gender and multitask ability Introduction As the civilization is being developed and people has faced several works concurrently, they get to improve a skill to handle and manage the matters fast and more efficiently. As those situation inevitably occur, the notion of “Multitasking”, which is defined as the behavior to perform two or more task simultaneously of one person (Wikipedia), has been mainly used and stood out these days. For example, people usually do multitasking such as having a meal while doing their cell phone, or talking to their companions while walking on the road. Even, they may not recognize if what they are doing is multitasking. Like this, as multitask is being done by almost people, several debates and theories of it continue to emerge in a variety of fields. At first, when it comes to the …show more content…
However, it does not make sense that we know all factors of multitasking. For example, first, as time goes by, the new aspects can occur. In contrast, it is not changed that something new has influence on thinking and thinking also change one’s behaviors. At this point, thinking can be intelligence (multitasking skill in one’s brain) and behaviors is the actions that are shown by this thinking (Cherry, 2015). Also, when it comes to the age’s difference, depending on the age, the intelligence level will be changed (Green, 1969). So, rather than trying to consider all possible factors, only making standards with intelligence level and gender, which can be related to almost factors, will give us more precise path to get more reliable results relatively
Is technology changing our brains for the better or for the worse? The human brain is a biological masterpiece and is the most advanced organ on the face of the planet. In Richard Restak’s essay “Attention Deficit: The Brain Syndrome of Our Era,” he speaks about how the advancements in technology in this modern era have affected the brain’s habits and functions. Multitasking is requiring the brain to change how it functions, its organizations, and efficiency throughout day-to-day tasks and is also enabling people to do things otherwise not possible. Within the past two decades, the amount of time we spend on using technology has increased by a large amount.
Alina Tugend, author of, “Multitasking Can Make You Lose … Um … Focus,” is an accredited author that is featured in multiple respected publications. This article was published in the New York Times in 2008. The article talks about multitasking and how most people think that is a great thing, but in reality it causes more problems that we know. Mrs. Tugend voices her opinion on how multitasking hurts more people that it helps. Her opinions are clearly voiced throughout this article that she does not think multitasking is a benefit for people.
Because time is being filled with short-term stimulation—during which brief tidbits of knowledge can be gained with minimal effort—rather than the long-term stimulation from books and print, people’s brains are being retrained to think in short bursts rather than fully developed ideas when speaking or planning. Games, texting, blog posts, and hyperlinks have begun to take over our time reducing interest in in-depth learning or prolonged research. These changes in the way people think are leading to an overall decrease in attention span, even in adults who at one point in time would claim that they had a sufficient attention
Every new tool shapes the way we think, but does this change make us more intelligent? Carr claimed that his reading comprehension decreases the more he accesses the Internet. He supports his claim by admitting “the deep reading that used to come naturally had become a struggle” (Carr 314). He states that not only him, but his friends also, have the same problem of not being able to concentrate reading a book or lengthy articles and will often “get fidgety, lose the thread, [and] begin looking for something else to do” (Carr 314). Carr feels the time he spends online is rewiring his brain, unable to “think the way [he] used to think” (Carr 313).
Fast Entertainment and Multitasking in an Always-On World is an insightful article written by S. Craig Watkins. He is a professor at the University of Texas at Austin and teaches in the Radio-Television-Film, Sociology, and the Center for African and African American Studies departments. He has also written previous titles, many with the topic of Hip Hop. This article talks about how many people today are always on some kind of electronic device. There are also many times when they are multitasking between devices.
In my references I stumble upon various results of experiments that authors mention in their work and those results stated some of the consequences the brain faces after multitasking. Eric Jaffe (2012) shows how our brains are being rewired when we multitask with technology and how it’s nowadays harder for us to finish one single task in a reasonable time. Another results from the investigations is that very time the brain is forced to multitask it uses a vast amount of his nutrients leaving the person exhausted and with no energy only after a short period of time. My sources reveal that multitasking in general is bad, but when combined with technology it becomes dangerous. It has been scientifically proven that multitasking leaves us stressed,
In today’s essay I will be discussing two articles: they are “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” by Nicholas Carr and “Multitasking Can Make You Lose… Um. Focus,” by Alina Tugend. In these articles the authors talk about how the internet is bad for us and why multitasking is hurting our society. But before I begin keep this is mind: how long do you believe the universe would function without technology in their everyday lives. Without multitasking how much work will we get done as a society.
In today’s society people often correlate test scores and percentages to how intelligent a person is. Although, I believe intelligence is also a mix of experiences, I strive to control what people judge me on, which is calculated numbers.
Our thought processes, in short, begin to mirror the way a computer processes things in terms of efficiency and data processing. Today, it seems that almost everything is on or reliant upon the Internet. It is “becoming our map and our clock, our printing press and our typewriter, our calculator and our telephone, and our radio and TV,” Carr says (321). The Internet interconnects everything we do in the media age.
Hovhan refers to the internet as “electronic cocaine” which she uses to support her research and reasoning behind why multitasking causes alterations to neurological productivity pathways. As an internet user and multitasker myself, I felt the need to connect the research of these three sources. Although they all argue that internet multitasking is negative and has hindering implications, they each provide different unique evidence to highlight their claim. Through the culmination of these articles, it becomes clear that internet multitasking not only lowers our productivity, but also hurts our brains on a neurological level. Productivity research that utilizes systematic benchmark tests, is an easier way to measure the consequences of multitasking as brain scans are not needed to show results.
Learning is fun, but it is also hard work. It’s so extraordinarily well documented as to be almost a truism at this point, but multitasking and particularly technology (e.g., cell phones, email) can make the deep concentration needed for real learning difficult or impossible. Set aside dedicated time for learning and minimize interruptions. When you read, find a quiet place, and leave your phone behind. If you’re taking a class or participating in a reading group, take handwritten notes, which improve retention and understanding, and leave laptops, mobiles devices, and other disrupting technologies in your car or bag far out of reach.
Verna von Pfetten acknowledges in the article “Read This Story Without Distraction (Can You?),” that monotasking has its benefits although the environment has more to do with focusing than one might think. Everyone knows “multitasking” doesn’t actually exist. The brain cannot multitask. Instead, it switches from one task to another, meeting the demands of only one at a time. There is a cost associated with this switch, resulting in brain power being eaten away causing productivity to slip.
Attention has always been a prized commodity. The brain knows it and cognitive psychologists know it, but the average person has yet to fully grasp the concept. Articles on how to multi-task still flag the covers of popular magazines, and distracting cell phones and tablets accompany students to class on the forefront of their desks next their notes. It has been verified time and time again that the mind simply cannot attend to two things simultaneously; one can pay attention to one thing or another, but not to two things at once. People know that neutralizing distractions will yield invaluable minutes of clarity and focus, but for most, the application of such, is nearly impossible.
Multitasking makes it difficult to gain any knowledge when a person's attention is in multiple places. Christine has a strong inductive argument that explains
Abstract This paper is about communication, collaboration, problem solving skills, ethics and organizational citizenship. More thoroughly, this paper is written to understand how I as a citizen in an organization can better myself and others. The information I have learned in the past six weeks will be used to understand the areas I have improved on, and in what ways I can keep improving so that I can provide my organization with the individual they are looking for.