In the book, “Monster” by: Walter Dean Myers and the documentary “Murder on Sunday Morning” both present similar cases and storylines. They both bring the topic of racism,and injustice together. Yet they approach the topics in different ways. While they have many differences, they also have similarities. In Monster the story follows the process that sixteen year old Steve is facing when he is accused of assisting in a robbery turned murder. In “Murder on Sunday Morning” the documentary follows the trials of Brenton, a fifteen year old who is being charged for first degree murder and robbery. In both trials Brenton and Steve were treated unjustly by law enforcement. Brenton claimed he was hit by a detective, while Steve was overhearing security bet over his trial. In Steve’s …show more content…
He went on stand and when asked about where he was, or what he was doing he gave clear answers.Meanwhile, in Monster Steve never stated whether or not he was innocent. When Steve was on stand he answered most questions with “I don’t remember or I don’t know. I found it odd,but the author left Steve’s innocence up to the reader as if they were the jury, taking all the evidence. Brenton’s lawyers also strongly believed he was innocent while Steve’s lawyer didn’t believe he was innocent “I know she (Ms.O’Brien) thinks I’m guilty”-Steve Pg(138). Even though both of the stories had different opinions of their innocence neither of the accused gave up.
In the end although both the book and documentary are different they also share some similarities. They clearly went over the topics of racism and injustice in their own unique way. In Monster by using flashbacks and testimonies , and in Murder On A Sunday Morning by using evidence and witnesses.The book and the documentary bring to the table new perspectives on the same topics. I think that it is important how all the topics got wrapped up into one storyline and that is exactly what they both
This is proved when Mr. Sawicki testifies. In the novel Mr. Sawicki testifies stating, “‘He’s very much involved with depicting his neighborhood and environment in a positive manner.’” (Myers 235). Throughout the novel there weren't a lot of people that testified about Steve. In fact, there were probably only three people.
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
Affairs affect people in different ways, but no one could imagine an affair destroying their ability to psychologically function. The “killings” by Andre Dubus is a shocking story about a killer named Richard who murders frank the man having an affair with his wife, who is his pride and joy. Riveted with murder and passion the author revels the characteristics of Richard Strout’s in the “killings” as a psychological obsessive and controlling person; these traits effect his emotions and behaviors throughout the story. Richards’s anger which evolves throughout the story, is what leads to his obsessive and controlling behaviors. The author explains Richards’s background as a young, striving man, who is overcome by failure, and this contributes
If you were blamed for a crime you didn’t do, would you let that accusation go and let it tarnish your reputation? Would you let it fly by and have others judge from every angle? No, right? Normally people who get accused of crimes demand justice as they know they did not commit the crime and only justice can give them the freedom they deserve. But let’s look at Steve Harmon, the main character from the book Monster by Walter Dean Myers who was on trial for murder.
Firstly, in my opinion I think it has more details than the movie. The book has the same characters but in the book there is three sisters. The book had details that felt so real. It described everything, the setting and the mood.
So even though there are a few similarities, there are more differences. The movie is mainly about civil rights, but the book isn’t which changes the plot a lot. While there are some similarities like how all the family members are the same; there are still more differences. Even though both the book and the movie are “Watsons Go To Birmingham”, they are very different from each
Steve’s judgment of his actions is similar to a pendulum swinging. Although Steve believes within himself that he is innocent, of the important people around him, make him insecure as to the degree of his innocence and turn to others for confirmation. Steve Harmon, the defendant, is faced with an internal conflict that questions his self-identity and his character in relation to the crime.
Murder on a Sunday Morning, is an Oscar award-winning documentary that tells of the conviction and trial of 15-year-old Brenton Butler for the death of Mary Ann Stephens in Jacksonville, Florida of May 2000. The film is a 111-minute movie directed by Jean-Xavier de Lastrade. The plot originates from the incident of Mary Ann Stephens being shot in the head by a black assailant; and then begins to unravel as Brenton Butler is arrested 90 minutes after the murder has occurred. Pat McGuinness, one of the main interviewees in the movie, takes up the case and defends Brenton Butler. The documentary presents the film from the trial, as well as interviews and investigations that Pat McGuinness and his partner Ann Finnel performed to gather facts for
Murder on a Sunday Morning Throughout the real-life story, Murder on a Sunday Morning, a 15-year-old African American male by the name of Brenton Butler, is accused of murdering an innocent Florida tourist and is being tried for a life sentence. This film shows similarities to the fictional film 12 Angry Men, where a teenager is on trial for the murder of his father. These similarities are shown in a variety of ways throughout these films, such as the argument for the defendant being mainly focused on as well as both cases being strongly based on witness testimonies. Nonetheless, there still are differences in these films such as how the argument was discussed through the lawyers or jurors. One of the major similarities shown throughout
A major difference is that there are some characters that were in the book that aren't in the movie like Flora Baumbach, Theo Theodorakis, and Madame Hoo. Even though the movie wasn’t as good or as exciting as the book, they were both interesting and are fun to read and listen
The whole jury said he is not guilty. People also said that Steve had done nothing wrong; they believed he had nothing to do with it. However, just because he was found not guilty doesn't mean Steve was innocent. Therefore, Steve was a monster. Steve was a monster because he was friends with bad people.
After reading Monster, there are two questions that need to be answered. These questions are “Was Steve Harmon the lookout for the robbery” and “Is Steve Harmon responsible for the death of Mr. Nesbitt?” He may have been acquitted, but this does not make him innocent. The evidence clearly shows that Steve Harmon was the lookout for the robbery and thus responsible for Mr. Nesbitt’s death because he was at the planning of the robbery, he was named by Bobo Evans as the lookout, and rather than reporting Evans and King to the authorities, he helped them murder and rob an innocent man.
Perceptions from others can be cruel. Criminals are often thought of negatively by themselves and are also disrespected by others in society. The novel Monster presents the impressions people have about Steve Harmon, an accused criminal on trial for robbery and murder. Furthermore, the text explains Steve’s views of himself during and after time in prison from first person point-of-view. The novel Monster by Walter Dean Myers highlights the various perceptions that exist about an accused criminal.
Although there are many differences between the two, there are also many similarities. Like how in both the movie and the novel she outsmarts the
The popular song, “Sunday Bloody Sunday” was written and sung by the very famous Irish rock band U2. This Irish group is known for not staying with the norm of the music industry, they like to speak their minds and sing about the problems in the world and how they affect others. Each of their songs have different beats, and tunes, making them one of the most well-known and well-rounded bands in the world. This song is ranked in one of the best song of all time for many reasons, first it has a historic background that many people can connect to, a melody that makes you feel the emotions that the writer wanted the audience to have. With the audience having these powerful sensations, it makes the listeners imagine themselves and their own emotions.