Do you agree with the notion that the United States Government has seriously discriminated against Muslims in post 9/11 era?
In this paper I will argue whether the United States Government has seriously discriminated against Muslims in post 9/11 era or not. On this topic, I chose to agree with the notion that yes, Muslims have been discriminated against by the United States Government especially after the events of 9/11. First, I will argue that the United States Government has implemented procedures and regulations against Muslims that violate constitutional law in response to the events of 9/11. Second, I will argue that in matters of national security, Muslims are a primary target of surveillance, investigation, and interrogations compared to
…show more content…
In this first paragraph, I will argue that the procedures and regulations the United States Government has implemented against Muslims in response to the events of 9/11 violate constitutional law. To start off, Under the Fourteenth Amendment, also referred to as “the protection clause,” the definition according to CNN news in an article titled “The Bush-era Muslim registry failed. Yet the United States could be trying it again,” the article, states that the United States must treat every individual living within the United States territory in the same manners as any other in similar conditions and circumstances, including the equal protection of their rights. The fourteenth amendment also prohibits states from denying any person within its territory the equal protection of the laws. This includes the rights to freedom of speech, the rights to free travel, and religious freedom. Former President George W. Bush and his administration started a program named The National Security Entry-Exit Registration System (NSEERS) on 9/10/2002. According to the CNN, Attorney General John Ashcroft stated the attack of 9/11 exposed the
During the brutal attack called 9/11, four planes got hijacked by terrorists. One hit the the Pentagon, another one crashed into a field in Pennsylvania, and the last two hit the World Trade Center towers in New York City. Thousands of lives died that day due to the attack, but many have asked , “Could they have been saved?”In fact, they did not even need to be saved, it could have been prevented all together. The intelligence agencies FBI, CIA, NSA were partially responsible for not stopping the attacks.
9-12: Post-9/11 America “doug robinson: before and after 9/11” “9/11: the week before - the atlantic” “while america slept: the true story of 9/11 - NBC” “9 things you should know about the aftermath of 9/11” .hunter wade. How have the events of 9/11 and its aftermath shaped what it means to be an American? Consider the actions the government has taken after these events, how it changed people 's lives and how you think of yourself living in a post-9/11 America. “Consider that before September 11, 2001, there was no cohesive system in place to vet passengers in advance of flying; only limited technologies in place for uncovering a wide array of threats to passengers or aircraft; no comprehensive federal requirements to screen checked or carry-on baggage; and only minimal in-flight security on most flights” People stood frozen in front of their TVs for hours watching in disbelief as replays showed airlines fly into buildings and skyscrapers tumble before 9/11 you could stroll to the gate at the airport without a ticket and greet family and friends as they arrived or see them off as they
The American Constitution gives U.S. citizens basic civil liberties that provide protection from the federal government through the Bill of Rights and the Amendments added throughout American history. However, the national government has repeatedly taken away these significant liberties during a war, and in this era the government’s war on terrorism stirs up controversy all over the globe after the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Supporters of the government’s detainment of non-citizens and the NSA’s surveillance of data Internet Service Providers--for example, claim that being secure and safe takes priority over established values. In the anthology Rereading America, Gary Colombo’s The Myth of Freedom;
Subsequent, to the September 11th,2001 terrorist attacks, the Department of Justice proposed The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act) to prevent future terroristic attacks. According to Preserving Life and Liberty article, the PATRIOT ACT has played an imperative part in “a number of successful operations to protect innocent Americans from plans of terrorist dedicated to destroying America and our way of life.” Further, Rosemary Jenks emphases in her article “A Summary of the Anti-Terrorism Law’s Immigration – Related Provision” that the PATRIOT Act focuses mainly on “reinforcing the arsenal of tools available to the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and federal prosecutors for identifying and disabling terrorist networks operating both
The controversy of ‘Muslim ban’ is going through a similar flow as Japanese internment which was proposed by U.S government after the attack on Pearl Harbor. On February 19, 1942, three months after the
In the United States of America today, racial profiling is when an individual is accused of committing a crime because of their race. There has been a lot of conversation about this topic whether racial profiling is okay or it’s considered as being racist and law enforcement can not stop and search someone because of their race. Racial profiling is a bad idea because people are being judged and might feel harassed because of their race. In an essay “Everything Isn’t Racial Profiling” written by Linda Chavez explains how Arab people are being discriminated at airports simply because they are Arab.
In the months after the September 11 attacks, the lives of most Americans returned to something like normalcy as original and normal life to maintain their life. But for the Arab, South Asian, North African and those who are based on Muslim fundamentalism, life relatively changed fundamentally and be unchangeable. Thousands of people were detained, most often without charge or access to a lawyer; deportation families apart, and every virtual family member of those communities become a suspect. Even though there is no one of the immigrants who caught up in post 9/11 sweeps and detained that were ever shown to have been involved in terrorist activities, most immigrants are regarded as people who are deserve to suspect.
Have the laws and regulations passed as a result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 been helpful or hurtful to American society? On September 11, 2001, there were nineteen militants, that were associated with a terrorist group named al-Qaeda. This Islamic extremist group hijacked four airplanes, this group was sent to commit suicide attacks on the United States. Out of the four planes two of them were flown into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in New York. The other two planes also crashed but in separate places, one hit the Pentagon near Washington D.C. and the fourth plane crashed in a field in Pennsylvania.
We see it in schools, politics and even in major travel sits such as airports. “For one thing, I travel a great deal and it seems to me, each time I enter US airport security, that the terrorists have won, because now I cannot pass any flight—whether for an hour or for two days—without having my entire body subjected to a search, scan, and/or pat” (Wadud 701). These invasive searches have been reportedly subjected to the Muslim coming into America. It starts with just one look, the look of a Hijab or a Turban. This is considered to be racial profiling yet it is not corrected in the law it goes on each and every day.
The terrorist attack on September 11, 2001 had an enormous impact all across the United States. Since this life changing event the United States has taken extreme measures to ensure the safety of all American citizens. This deadly attack has led to many changes in Immigration and security (Krikorian 567). It has also contributed to the unnecessary judgements against ethnic backgrounds and religion (Chavez 563). The increase of racial profiling, fear and paranoia, upgrades in security, and decrease in immigration are all factors that contribute to the results of 9/11.
Some people may think that the 14th amendment does a poor job of protecting people’s rights. In document five it explains how on September 11, 2001,with the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, it has caused video surveillance in the United States to increase. For example the U.S has programs that use facial recognition that help match photographs of criminals faces to the criminal. Another program that we use helps prevent suicide bombers from attacking. Some people may think that prevention of terrible events reoccuring or occurring is a good thing, but using security systems everywhere may be a violation of their rights and privacy.
The Declining View of Muslims Post 9/11 September 11th, 2001 was a terrifying time for most who can remember the attacks, but for American Muslims this stomach-wrenching fear has not gone away, even sixteen-years afterwards. After the attacks, Muslims have been treated like they do not belong in America. They have also been considered “un-American” for believing in their religion, because the attacks were caused by radical Muslims. After 9/11 they have had to deal with hate crimes, job discrimination, and a harder life because the terrorists were Muslim.
It would be unjust to pick and choose when our rights, specifically Freedom of Religion, can be exercised. Despite the fact that Muslims were responsible for the events of September 11th, limits should not be placed on all other Muslims just because a group of them did a bad thing. Slavery was a bad thing, should all white people today be held accountable for it? The Holocaust was a bad thing, should anyone with Nazi German Ancestry be held responsible? And so, the main point former Mayor Michael Bloomberg intended to make is that the harmful actions of a few should not be justification for the oppression of the
Terrorist campaigns were climbing in decades prior to 9/11. A group of terrorists attacked New York’s World Trade Center on February 26, 1993. The aim of this attack was to drive two bomb loaded trucks into the basement of a building to bring down both of the towers of the World Trade Center. The mission was not accomplished, but the attack did kill six people. The organizer of this attack was Ramzi Yousef, whose uncle went on to be the operational commander of the attack at the World Trade Center on 9/11.
A. PREAMBLE The terrorist attack on September 11, 2001 has sparked intense curiosity and interest in the world especially the West to learn and investigate the religion of Islam. The Muslim people are portrayed as violent and barbaric, and Islam as oppressive and antithesis to human rights values. Thus, escalation of public opinion about Islam has encouraged debates and forums, and also stirred demonstrations and movements which have compelled the Muslims to speak out their minds and interpret and recast their texts viz. Quran and Sunnah of prophet Mohammad and even question and challenge the prevailing culture and practices, and domineering structures.