In Rebekah Nathan’s book titled My Freshman Year, she goes undercover to study what college is like from a freshman’s view. In the book My Freshman Year, I have chosen the pages 94-98. In these pages Rebekah Nathan effectively explains the way of class participation and discussions among college students
In My Freshman Year, Rebekah Nathan explains how, from what she has seen, that students do not discuss or debate in class. In addition, even the discussions outside of class are of nothing to do with academics. For instance, in the beginning Nathan speaks about how teachers are having a difficult time getting to speak up in class and an answer to anything. She goes on to give example of reason why students feel the need to not speak up in
…show more content…
Rebekah does this in the most effective and proficient way. Rebekah starts out with us in the class room. She explains how students just don’t debate in class. Then goes on to say that the teachers can barely even get the students to speak up at all. In the light of other students not answering, she say she feels that on multiple occasions she has saved the teacher the agony, of no one answering, by speaking up herself. With that in mind Rebekah turned to the students to figure out why they would speak up in class. She was able to get some really good answers that really gave a good insight to the discussion. The students said that “No one listens to each other anyhow…I feel if I talk up a lot like I may be talking to much…The discussions are too teacher-directed—everyone is just saying what the teacher wants to hear” (94). These were wonderful responses that she put in, because it really gave a new view to what the students are thinking and how they feel. Next I also love how she says, “…it also made me realize that this was likely and issue that I, through my teacher’s eyes, considered much more important that most students did” (95). It was so fantastic how she was able to put her old perspective as a teacher in with her new perspective as a student together and come up with this new conclusion. So if students are not talking about academics what are they talking about? She explains and gives plenty of examples of what the students are and are not talking about. She explains that they are not talking about whether they enjoyed the material or how they felt about it. Instead the closest thing they get to academics is far from deep. Students say things like, “How did you do on that paper...What did you put for number 19…I mean, I didn’t know what he wanted—I just guessed and b.s.-ed my way through this” (96). Lastly I really liked
Cutterham’s essay, Students are Anything but Coddled, is effective because it uses classroom dynamics and university protests. Cutterham uses examples of how students are changing the dynamic in clasrooms and on campuses through social media and protests and argues that students are not soft and pampered. In his essay, Cutterham uses the example of protesting students to show that today’s students are not “coddled”. He uses an example of Naimh McIntyre.
According to the article, “Neither a Wallflower Nor a Paris Geller Be” (Rebecca Schuman, Slate Magazine, 14 Oct 14), in order to be a successful student, class participation is the key aspect of college students. Additionally, Schuman explains that taking part in the class is to experiment with new thoughts, banter about, and examine. It is not to win a type of splendid comment challenge, she argues. Regardless of whether by the timid, hesitant, or excited. Agreeing to Schuman you ought to connect a gathering venture where, indeed, a few people from the gathering are more brilliant than others.
In addition, she appeals to the emotions of her audience by writing on a deeper emotional level and referring to college as a self-finding, life-changing experience, rather than another unpleasant chore in one’s life. Throughout Addison’s article she successfully builds strong emotional connections with her readers through words of philosophy and personal experience. Addison’s techniques for appealing to the emotions of the audience are undoubtedly
Immediately hands shoot up in the air. Lots of students speak out their thoughts but Mr. Neck tells them to sit down. David then stands up from his seat and stands up for what he believes is right. He thinks that everyone has the right to speak up about their own thoughts and
Even though the teachers tried to encourage him to “Stand up… Speak up. Speak to the entire class.” (513). His
Bex wanted to answer the teacher’s question but she was too shy. And the room was oddly quiet. It seemed like one of those situations where the teacher answers their own question when no one else steps up.
Sanders supports his argument with the appeal of ethos by validating the fact that he is a college professor and sees students versus learners all the time. For instance, Sanders says “I see this [students being afraid of being wrong] most often when students turn in written papers (Sanders 4). By mentioning his first-hand account he is building is authority and trustworthiness on the subject at hand. Finally, Sanders appeals to pathos when he involves emotions and presents his invitation to students to become a learner. He addresses the reader as “you” to form the basic relationship.
Her argument is not based on evidence or researches, it is based only in her personal experience and examples. The attitude that she keeps is not the attitude of a teacher and so much less of a parent. She looks very immature and it makes her argument ineffective, so her try to convince her audience fail. Excluding students from the audience is inevitable because they are the center of the discussion. However, Sherry leaves them out, she made up her audience by teachers and parents.
The main argument is that perceived throughout the reading is that the schools itself is failing students. They see a student who may not have the greatest test scores or the best grades, and degrade them from the idea of being intellectual. Graff states, “We associate the educated life, the life of the mind, too narrowly and exclusively with subjects and texts that we consider inherently weighty and academic” (Graff 244). Schools need to channel the minds of street smart students and turn their work into something academic.
The teacher appears bored throughout and once Jesse has finished, she said “thank you… in such a way that the people thought it was OK to laugh” (113). Jesse, despite his best efforts, is not like the others in his class, and the stories from his culture exaggerate their differences.
Professor Morgan allows students to talk about whatever they want even if it does not pertain to current studies. She does not know the students names and the students do not know each other’s names. 4. What standards of excellence has each professor established for his or her course?
What this essay is saying about students and education is there is no student who doesn’t want to learn or what’s to get an education. Everybody is capable of learning, but the problem is sometimes the education are given by people who don’t care if you are learning or not. In this essay, we learned that the author was put in classes where the teachers didn’t care too much about their students and because of this he become a mediocre student. Not because he didn’t like school or he was lazy, but because there was no inspiration in learning. Luckily, Mike Rose the author of I Just Wanna Be Average found someone that wants him to start learning someone that make him change his mind.
I have been humbled enough to have the opportunity to take a dual enrollment class while in high school. Similar to any first experience, I was nervous. In fear of the unknown, I sat in the back of the class and watched students hustle to claim the remaining seats. From my perspective, I could see the uncomfortable shifting and the awkwardness clung to me like humidity. When it came time for the dreaded introductions, there was a quick moment of panic and annoyance.
Gerald Graff’s argument on how educational systems are missing a great opportunity to tap into “street smarts” and focus them into a path of academic work is indeed convincing (Graff, 198). After all, anyone who’s been through the American educational system knows odds are often stacked against the “street smarts.” This is especially true in english classes, where one is often required to read boring and somewhat heartless books like, 1984, Beowulf, and the majority of Shakespeare’s classics. This is not to say these books are bad or shouldn’t be read during one’s schooling years, instead, the problem is one of apathy. For instance, in my high school years I never even remotely liked to read books Othello, but I loved to read magazines and
Her stubborn demeanor is demonstrated when criticizing Sister James’ classroom;