The world is made up of different communities, all with different outlooks on how the social, economic, and education policies should be run. Plato and the Puritans each had their own ideas of how their communities would be run, using different social, economic and educational policies. Using some of their polices, I am looking at how my own ideal community would come together and be run. By piecing together different points and ideas of both the Puritans and Plato, I can look at how I want my community to function. Plato believe that in a community the social structure should put people into groups based on their function or occupation. For example, first class is producers, second class is auxiliaries, and the third class is the guardians. …show more content…
The Gentle People were those of the highest class, they were wealthier, more respected, had a title, and people would bow when they saw them. The middle class was the Yeomanry, they were less wealthy, less respected, but were called ‘Goodman’ or ‘Goodwife’ when addresses. The last class is that of the Laborers. These were the least respected, the least wealthy, addressed by their first name, and they worked for a living. The puritans believed that the wealth shouldn’t be equal, but is should be drastic either. They got rid of aristocracy, making it so that you could not be born into power. Giving away with the highest class, but they also didn’t allow poor people into their community. They wanted everyone to be able to thrive in their community, so the highest and lowest classes were not allowed in. The puritans did not believe in aristocracy, the thought that if God gave people power and wealth then they deserve that wealth and should be able to enjoy it, but someone born into the power and wealth was not given it by God, so they do not deserve to have it. If God did give the child who was born into wealth the ability to lead, then that child would be able to stay. But the child is not guaranteed to be able to stay in a position of power just because their parents were (Fischer 178). The puritans believed that God gave them certain abilities, and no matter what class you were born in, you had …show more content…
I agreed with both social views that there should be classes, but there should not be three major classes that everything is broken down into. There is a bunch of different types of people and the classes should reflect that. I also agree and would implement the fact that just because you are born into something does not mean you are going to do a good job at it, or that you have a natural ability for it, each person should go where they fit best, and not because their parents were this, it should be what they are good at. For example, a child of two shoe makers should not become a shoe maker just because their parents were, they should if they have a natural ability to, but if they are better at making bread they should do that job instead. That is how I would implement the social ideas of Plato and the
In the Puritan family, the family managed all things. The towns were seen as part of a greater family, all were invited to weddings and baptisms. Doors were never locked because the idea was that Puritans should have nothing to hide from each other. Even on the honeymoon it was common for an aunt, uncle, or parent to watch the new couple make love for the first time to insure everything was done right. Church was a large part of the Puritan experience and the Meeting was a time when the people of the town would gather in the church with the minister to discuss religion, voting, or anything else of importance.
What Caused the Salem Witch Trials of 1692 In Salem, Massachusetts there were Witch Trials held during the summer months of 1692. Throughout the seventeenth century in New England, witchcraft was said to be a crime punishable by death. Puritans came to New England in the early 1600’s to practice their Christianity in the purest form possible. They believed every word in the bible and that the words of God were to be followed down to the last sentence there was. Havoc started occurring around the town and 19 women along with men were hanged for witchcraft.
In Plato’s the Republic, Plato, in the voice of Socrates, discusses virtue and what the word means. In doing so he spends a good amount of the discussion describing the “ideal” city which he calls the Republic. Many of the elements of this city seem far-fetched and very theoretical, especially the ones concerning women and children. Plato advocates that women should be educated along with men and take up governmental positions. Additionally, he believes that all wives and children should be held in common.
In the Republic, Plato confers with other philosophers about the true definition of justice. Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus relay their theories on justice to Plato, when he inquires as to what justice is. Cephalus believes only speaking the truth and paying one’s debts is the correct definition of justice (The Republic, Book I). However, Plato refutes this with an example of a friend who has lost his wits and would be caused harm by repayment of a debt. This leads to Polemarchus’ view on justice, doing harm to one’s enemies and helping one’s friends.
Puritans- was a dissenter religious group which was trying to reform the Church of England by what they referred to it as purifying it. Some of the first Puritans included Anne Dudley who was the first English-speaking poet and Simon Bradstreet. Their main goal to was to create a “holy” community in New England. John Winthrop- the first governor and main person in charge of creating a model new society of Puritans in America.
They wanted to create pure, moral Christian society based on moral living. By hard working, integration of religion in politics, and social development of certain lifestyle practices, Puritans had a large influence on the development of the New England colonies from 1630s through the 1660s. Puritans believed in hard work as the pathway of success since they thought they were favored by God to succeed (Doc I). They tried to shun idleness and believed that being lazy is not profitable (Doc C).
Overall, I can conclude that these two philosophers have a different perspective about life and ethics. Consequently, It is true that Plato make normative claims. However, his philosophy was not conclusive since continuously changes were made. It is also true that
Plato's Republic is centered on one simple question: is it always better to be just than unjust? This is something that Socrates addresses both in terms of political communities and the individual person. Plato argues that being just is advantageous to the individual independent of any societal benefits that the individual may incur in virtue of being just. I feel as if Plato’s argument is problematic. There are not enough compelling reasons to make this argument.
According to Thomas Brooks, "Sin in a wicked man is like poison in a serpent; it is in its natural place. " Many can argue that the Puritan democracy was very corrupt. Stephen Foster, the author of the essay, “Puritanism and Democracy: A Mixed Legacy” states, “New Englanders admitted that no man could read the law of nature alright, that all men were equally corrupt.” Because of this corruptness, Puritans struggled to create a democracy, never viewed others as equals, and even after trying to create a democratic government, they acted as hypocrites.
It is stated in the Bible, “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live’’ (Exodus 22:18 King James). This is presumably the reason that the town of Salem first thought of the idea of witchcraft when the girls were ill. Salem was a very religious town, following the Bible in every way they could, so when there was talk of witchcraft, they followed what they were taught and what they believed in which was not allowing a witch to live.
Puritans are Europeans who escaped religious persecution from the Church of England. The Puritans age likely varies from children to adults. However, it’s apparent that Winthrop is appealing more towards Puritan males to create their ideal utopia. Winthrop evokes God to entice the colonist to fruitfully colonize the land. He uses nationalism, religion, and imagery to entice the colonist into creating a bountiful colony.
Plato believed that politics served as only a guide for statesmen, people of high prominence who are wise, skillful, and proficient in the principles of government, which essentially made him an elitist. Plato’s main objective was to create a perfect society, a utopia. In Plato’s utopian society, he promotes class systems that have their own goals and objectives. The highest level consists of those who are the society’s policy makers and they have the responsibility of being wise and good rulers. The select few who know what is best for society.
Plato and Machiavelli were nevertheless, as similar as they were different on their beliefs in an idealistic government. Both of their ideas have been taught for years, and are certainly essential to understand how they interpret a perfect polis. Plato emphasis the question on what is justice for the people as well as for the Kallipolis and whether a just person is better off than an unjust person. Ethical beliefs are Plato’s main focus in a government.
aligns with reason and resists the desires of the appetite. It is in this part of the soul where the courage to be good is found. In the unjust soul, the spirit ignores reason and instead aligns with the appetitive desires, manifesting as the demand for the pleasures of the body. Plato asserts that the wise and just soul allows reason to govern the other parts, while the unwise and unjust soul allows conflict between the parts.12 Just as there is the appetitive part of the soul—the largest part of the soul—there is the productive class, or the workers, who have souls of bronze and account for the largest part of the population.13 This class includes the general population of laborers, plumbers, masons, carpenters, merchants, and farmers.
Essentially, Puritans are expected to follow a strict set of religious and moral guidelines from which their actions and morality are derived. According to Hall’s A Reforming People, these moral expectations first introduced by the pilgrims were the driving force behind the power that the Puritan ministry had over society: “Ministers and laypeople looked first to congregations as the place where love, mutuality, and righteousness would flourish, and second to civil society. …Alongside love, mutuality, and righteousness they placed another set of values summed up in the word “equity.” Employed in a broad array of contexts, the concept of equity conveyed the colonists’ hopes for justice and fairness in their social world.”