My So Called Enemy Analysis
In the trailer” My So Called Enemy” and the texts “Texas vs. Johnson” by William J. Brennan and “American Flag Stands For Tolerance” by Ronald J. Allen each provides strong information as to how people are treated differently because of their religion or culture, how the first amendment protects our freedom and how the flag should be treated. The information provided will explain how we as human being must be willing to accept diverse cultures and opinions that are different from our own. A handful of people get judged because of their culture or religion and that’s something you will have to deal with for the rest of your life. According to the trailer “My So Called Enemy” states that “Gal is from Israel, she said she understands that the other girls doesn’t like her because she’s from Israel but not all people are killers.” Because of this, Gal doesn’t have any friends because she’s from Israel and her culture is different from the other girls in the house. They also believe that people from Israel are all killer, which in Gal eyes, is not true. In addition, the trailer states “Ines said that she loves her Jewish friends but sometimes she thinks about and gets sad because they …show more content…
In the test “Texas vs. Johnson” states that “the way to preserve the flags special role is not to punish those who feel differently about these matter it’s to persuade them that they are wrong lines 37-39.” This reveals that everyone has a totally different way of showing that they are wrong and it’s not always by punishing them. Furthermore, in the text “America flag stand for tolerance “states in lines 64-67 “more than anything else the flag stands for free expression of ideas no matter how distasteful.” This means that the people can express whatever expression they are feeling and won’t be punished for it, no matter how distasteful. People opinions should matter no matter if they are not the
Summary Of Majority Opinions By William Brennan
253 Words | 2 PagesThe general argument made by author William J. Brennan in his work, “Majority Opinion,” is that it is legal to burn the flag if it is a form of political protest. More specifically, Brennan argues that we can not criminally punish people for burning a flag: the only thing we can do is convince them that they are wrong. He writes that they only thing we can do is “ Persuade them that they are wrong.” In this passage, Brennan suggests that criminally punishing a person for burning the flag will decrease the values of the flag by opposing the First Amendment. In conclusion, Brennan’s belief is that we should not punish people for burning the flag, but convince them that they are wrong.
Carlos Moore Summary
517 Words | 3 PagesThe Supreme Court has just recently rejected a case about the Confederate Flag emblem being on the Mississippi flag, and Carlos Moore, an African-American man, who petitioned the court over his reason of how the flag, where it is located in state buildings, courts, and schools, symbolically expresses support for white supremacists. The justices didn’t exactly give a reasoning for the appeal, but a federal appeals court rejected the lawsuit, because of lack of standing. In the article it says “They said he demonstrated that he feels stigmatized.
Wynny V. Phelps Case Study
1319 Words | 6 PagesThe Court noted, "If there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea itself offensive or disagreeable." For example, although the law punished actions, such as flag burning, that might arouse anger in others, it specifically exempted from prosecution actions that were respectful of venerated objects, e.g., burning and burying a worn-out flag. The majority said that the government could not discriminate in this manner based solely upon what message was communicated. Finally, the Court concluded that Texas' interest in preventing breaches of the peace did not support Johnson's conviction because the conduct at issue did not threaten to disturb the peace.
Supreme Court Case: Gregg V. Georgia 1976
1304 Words | 6 PagesThe Supreme Court decided in favor of Johnson. The Supreme Court believed that Johnson's actions were expressive conduct and there was a purpose to the flag burning. The Supreme Court decided that because this was an expression it is protected under the First Amendment. Image: Oregon Employment Division v. Smith 1990 Constitutional Question: Can a person be denied unemployment benefits when fired because of using illegal drugs in religious ceremonies? Background Information: Smith and a colleague worked at a drug rehabilitation center.
Enemies And Friends Analysis
522 Words | 3 PagesIn the two stories, “Enemies’ and “Friends”, from Tim O'Brien's The Things They Carried, O’Brien introduces two men, Jensen and Strunk. They are both fighting for the same side, but act violently toward one another for no real reason. The social codes and contracts that society is normally governed by have become arbitrary. Most of the time, those who steal are punished so they know that they shouldn’t do it again and so justice has been enacted. However, in the first story, “Enemies,” the complete lack of an attempt by Jensen and Strunk to resolve their conflict using peaceful and healthy conversation, or even going to a superior, demonstrates that normal social contracts have begun to break down.
American Flag Stand For Tolerance Analysis
337 Words | 2 PagesEveryone has different opinions about different people, but sometimes, people take it too far. Think about it: have you ever been judged, or have you ever judged someone based on how they look or who they are? Ronald J. Allen who wrote “American Flag Stands for Tolerance,” Bill Brummel, the director of a documentary called Bullied, and Lisa Gossels, the director of My So-Called Enemy are all role models, they all showed people resisting to accept others based on who they are, similar to some people in today’s world and during the Civil Rights movement, but then those people change their attitude towards others. In the story and in the movie clips, the author and the directors believe that something good should always come out of a really bad
Looking Like The Enemy Analysis
1010 Words | 5 PagesFamily #19788 The memoir Looking like the Enemy, was written by Mary Matsuda Gruenewald. Set during World War II after the attack upon Pearl Harbor. The Japanese Americans living in Western part of America had a since of betrayal and fear having to evacuate their homes and enter into internment camps.
Confederate Flag On Campus Essay
1212 Words | 5 PagesIs the existence of confederate flag in the campus influence how people think and act? The correct answer is no. The confederate flag has nothing to do with the neither mental capacity nor thought process of individuals. Its existence in the campus is never a distraction to any learning process. The confederate flag is not the minimum measure used by the University to determine, who enrolls and does not enroll.
Stands For Tolerance
445 Words | 2 PagesThe author states on lines 37-39 "The way to preserve the flag special role is not to punish those who feed differently matter. It is to persuade them that they are wrong." Because of this we can't punish or treat others differently because of what their opinions/beliefs we can only try persuading them without offending. Second, on lines 40-43 for "American Flag Stands for Tolerance" it states "My point is that freedom of conscience and expression is at the core of ourselves conception and requires the rejection of official dogma." This demonstrates that having freedom could cause people rejection which people won't think the same and could lead to disagreements.
Abel Fields Essay
520 Words | 3 PagesThe law in Texas at the time banned flag burnings. He was convicted, and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court. We ruled that Johnson’s right to free speech had been violated. He was expressing symbolic speech. We ruled that even though an opinion is unpopular, doesn’t mean we have the right to restrict his freedom of
Pledge Of Allegiance Research Paper
868 Words | 4 PagesApparently rarely used, the 26-year-old law threatens one year in jail and a $4,000 fine for those who intentionally damage, deface, mutilate or burn the U.S. or Texas flags. ”(Lindell). If flags can be burn legally under free speech then the Pledge of Allegiance should be optional rather than required. And also the first Amendment say “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” (U.S. Const. Amend.
Argumentative Essay: Stop Burning The American Flag !
595 Words | 3 PagesJohnson case, more and more people are taking advantage of the outcome. The results of people's actions are not just burning the flag, they are disrespecting the symbol of unity as a whole. For example, a teacher from Massey Hill Classical High School in North Carolina stepped on the flag during a freedom of speech lesson. “His goal, he said, was to teach them about how the country’s free speech protection have evolved over time” (Hawkins). There are other ways to demonstrate to children how protected their freedom of speech is.
The Usual Suspects Analysis
1385 Words | 6 PagesThe Usual Suspects, directed by Bryan Singer, exposed to its audience in a plot twist ending, that it was most “unusual” suspect who was “the devil”. A character branded as stupid and crippled with the “wounded innocence of a kid who ate all the cookies”, was revealed to be Keyser Soze, the character in the film who kills his own kids and wife to show the mob who is in control (Ebert par. 3). Gruesomely, he also killed members of the mob and their kids, parents, and friends; burned down their houses; and murdered the people who owed them money. The Character, Soze, is a criminal lord who is introduced in the film as a myth; the characters themselves are not certain about who the guy is; and his identity is ambiguous for most of the movie. The director strategically distracts the audience by framing the story of usual suspects in an intricate narrative attempting to discover the identity of the unknown psychopath, Soze; transforming The Usual Suspect, into quite unusual.
Clueless Analysis
1543 Words | 7 PagesFeminism through the lens of Roxanne Gay on the movie Clueless When you think of feminism, what comes to mind? Is it a man-hating, hairy armed/legged lesbian? If so, you are living in a misconception. Most people are in reality feminists, however, they do not understand the term.
More about My So Called Enemy Analysis
Summary Of Majority Opinions By William Brennan
253 Words | 2 PagesCarlos Moore Summary
517 Words | 3 PagesWynny V. Phelps Case Study
1319 Words | 6 PagesSupreme Court Case: Gregg V. Georgia 1976
1304 Words | 6 PagesEnemies And Friends Analysis
522 Words | 3 PagesAmerican Flag Stand For Tolerance Analysis
337 Words | 2 PagesLooking Like The Enemy Analysis
1010 Words | 5 PagesConfederate Flag On Campus Essay
1212 Words | 5 PagesStands For Tolerance
445 Words | 2 PagesAbel Fields Essay
520 Words | 3 PagesPledge Of Allegiance Research Paper
868 Words | 4 PagesExamples Of Social Determinants Of Health
1707 Words | 7 PagesArgumentative Essay: Stop Burning The American Flag !
595 Words | 3 PagesThe Usual Suspects Analysis
1385 Words | 6 PagesClueless Analysis
1543 Words | 7 Pages