Introduction
The issue of this case study would firstly involve with Sally's working relationship with the organization My Technology Pty Ltd. She was the victim of the issue of bullying and harassment in the workplace. The last issue there would be social media policy that was breach potentially which would regard as misconduct of employee's whom should not be breaching the company policy. Before we could conclude whether Sally is their independent contractor or an employee, we should find out and look at the rule of personal services and the other common law test which are the control test, integration test, the economic reality test, the ready mixed concrete test and also the multi-factor test. After studying the case, we would be able to
…show more content…
The intensity of control could be viewable with this case study (Sgobino V States of South Australia, 1987). The next would be the economic reality test that would show that an employee to be a worker if they are take in account to be economically dependent on their employer, as refer to in this case study that would relate to the economic reality test would be the Market investigations Ltd V Minister of Social Security. In the ready mixed concrete test, that would lead to a contract of service that would first exist if the dependant would work and provide skills of service that would receive salary from their employer and next the other conditions in the contracts are consistent that it being a contract of service. Finally, the multi-factor test would define as the controls of details over a person that would claim as a dependant that would be seen working as building workers industrial union of Australia v Odco Pty Ltd, 1991. This test would do up a comparing with two or more factors to analyse the relationships between the person and the organization. A contract of employment which is a contract of service that sates the rule of a personal service that is having no ability to delegate the entire work to the rest of the
Hi Mollie, The truckers started pulling out the X1 product yesterday. It looks like United Road bided out the work out to other carries to handle this movement. The trucking companies they are using are pulling VIN specific loads and are looking for exact locations. The two truckers I talked to yesterday, I told them the best I could do was tell them the general area to pick up the units and that they would have to find them.
trust and confidence.” Cobb v. Pennsylvania Life Ins. Co., 215 N.C.App. 268, 278, 715 S.E.2d 541, 550 (2011). Contrast these relationships with cases where the Court has found the existence of a fiduciary duty or relationship: where a defendant took advantage of his relationship with his ill brother (Terry v. Terry, 302 N.C. 77, 273 S.E.2d 674 (1981)); where a defendant took advantage of his relationship with his wife (Link v. Link, 278 N.C. 181, 179 S.E.2d 697 (1971)); or where a defendant son took advantage of his relationship with his mother (Vail v. Vail, 233 N.C. 109, 63 S.E.2d 202 (1951)).
On 04/23/2016 at approximately 23:15 hours deputies discovered a vehicle parked on the bridge that goes over the Ninnescha river, in the 800 block of E. 110th AVE North Sumner County, KS. the vehicle matched the description of a vehicle that was seen leaving the area of a verbal disturbance with shots fired. Deputy Coon went and made contact with the driver as I gave the vehicle information to dispatch. The vehicle was a white Chevrolet truck with Oklahoma tag of 541KQY VIN of 1GCGC29R5VE127727. After the vehicle information was given to dispatch I walked up to the passenger side door and began to look inside.
Introduction This case study of Vehar v. Cole National Group is a case where the plaintiff, Wendy Vehar, accused Cole National Group of sex discrimination claiming that as a female she was not being the same wage as a male for performing the same duties. Additionally this study will determine if the plaintiff established a valid prima facie as well as if there was a basis for equal work. Next, what factors did the appeals court base its decision and why is the other-than-sex factor that is presented by the employer insufficient to avoid a trial? Finally, what should the employer have done differently to ensure this type of situation did not occur in their business?
While employed at the Hershey Chocolate USA, Turners claims have been essential accommodation on defendant. In this case the looking the material facts in the light most favorable to the Turner, it is difficult to conclude the material of the law, based on the evidence that Turners directly threaten to its employees or place an “Undue hardship” on Hershey. Therefore, the question whether Turners can perform the essential function of her position with reasonable accommodation is an open material fact for trial. Hershey will have a opportunities at trial to defeat Turners claim by presenting that her proposed accommodation would make vulnerable the health safety of its employees therefore an employer is not requires to accommodate an employee. Moreover, it would carry out an undue hardship that even with the accommodation.
A final legal concern is Rita’s affair with her business partner Sam. While in this affair, there has been an access of unaccounted money towards her business from Sam. Financially her business is prospering because of Sam’s contributions, because of it there may be future legal concerns that may arise from her having to account for this money. Cultural issues
Coca-Cola Co. v. Koke Co. of America, 254 U.S. 143 (1920) U.S. Sup. Ct. Facts: 1886 marked the invention of a caramel-colored soft drink created by John Pemberton. Coca-Cola got its name after two main ingredients, coca leaves and kola nuts. The Coca-Cola Company is suing Koke Company of America from using the word Koke on their products. They believe Koke Company of America is violating trademark infringement and is unfairly making and selling a beverage for which a trademark Coke has used.
The 20 factor test further confirms that Kary was an employee of George’s company and not an independent contractor. At least ten factors from the test establish Kary as an employee, while four point toward her being an independent contractor. After consolidating and applying these factors collectively, George is best described as an employer of his peanut vendors. George has the ability to control their equipment and work hours.
Finkin, M. W., VanderVelde, L., Corbett, W., & Befort, S. F. (2009). Working Group on Chapter 2 of the Proposed Restatement of Employment Law: Employment Contracts: Termination. Empl. Rts. & Employ. Pol'y J., 13,
In the case study, Bob’s Meltdown, Jay Nguyen, CEO Concord Machines, has to handle a case of psychological harassment resulting due to work related stress; the main accused being his best manager, Bob Dunn. Jay needs to find a suitable solution as soon as he can to avoid being sued by Annette. Jay’s dilemma is that on one hand he cannot let Bob go as he is his best manager and only his department is earning all the profits for the company and on the other hand Annette has made it clear that if Bob stays, she’ll leave.
We will be able to analysis the evaluations and track the progress of the victim and be confident the
Business 140 Take Home Examination Randy and Laura, a newly engaged couple, had taken a trip to the local Warehouse in preparation for a trip they have been both planning. Unfortunately while Laura was searching for the perfect ski jacket, a display of cooking stoves fell from the above sky shelves. Laura is not the first to have been injured, or killed by department store sky shelves. However, not only was she a victim of corporate greed, and there lack of safety, but also a victim of theft. Laura was pictured walking into the Warehouse with a diamond necklace, and a ruby and diamond ring which was never brought back to her possession after the incident.
On April 15th, Diane seems to have been laid off but, Andrew did not provide a proper notice of termination to Diane nor indicated that she has been terminated. Diane has an obligation to mitigate. Diane must try to find another job after being terminated but, Diane failed to search for another job which shows she has failed her obligation to mitigate. Diane Pardu should be entitled to severance pay of two days’ wages for each completed year of service, plus five days’ wages. When Diane has been laid off for more than three months, she can treat this layoff as a termination and claim termination pay and severance pay.
A common issue in today’s society is the increasing number of young people who are being sentenced for joint enterprise. There are many arguments for and against this law due to many not wanting innocent people locked up for a crime they witnessed, or being sentenced for observing dangerous and illegal actions which isn’t actually their fault. I believe joint enterprise should no longer be used. The reason for this is because I personally think only the one who commits the crime should hold a punishment. I do believe those who took part deserve to be punished too, just not as severely.
So making a bad decision is never fun. I’d like to think that most of us prefer not to make them but can’t help to sometimes because we think a bad decision isn’t that bad. It might even be a good one in the right mind set. The point of this paper being to reflect on a pass choice looking at it with the elements of critical thinking. My bad decision is one I think most are guilty of, waiting until the last minute on something important.