The main outreach of the United States government that explores new boundaries never investigated before, designs products never thought possible before, and most importantly inspires people, has had its budget slashed. According to Goldstein (2007), NASA was originally created to beat the Soviet Union in the Space Race has taken on many different roles. In an article for NASA’s website, J.R. Wilson (2008) uses Dr. Michael DeBakey, a heart surgeon, as an example of someone who felt the benefit of NASA’s wide research scope. Dr. DeBakey now uses a heart pump in surgerys, invented because of the research done by NASA (Wilson, 2008). One of NASA’s many inventions that directly improve the lives of Americans. Unfortunately, the budget for …show more content…
The budget has been diminished completely all the way to half of a percent (Zeller, 2014). The U.S. needs to make a larger investment into NASA, by increasing their overall budget therefore benefiting citizens and the country. In this essay, I will go over the history of NASA and their budget, the problems a low budget for NASA generates. Next, I will explain the causes of NASA’s decrease in budget and the effects this has had on the US. Finally, I will advocate why the US should increase their budget to double what it is currently at also addressing counter-arguments.
Due to the fact of low funding, the problems caused have been immense. Underfunding NASA affects many different industries and the citizens of the US. The effect it has on citizens is a disheartening one, people are being deprived of inspiration. No longer are heroes being created for people to idolize. Nor is there a large movement looking forward to the ideas of the future. When NASA was being properly funded, kids and adults alike had astronauts to spark their scientific interest. This spark changed many people 's lives, encouraging citizens to become more familiar with science. Creating a scientific …show more content…
A large amount of Americans are either misinformed or not informed at all on what percent NASA accounts for in the national budget. In a study done by the University of Houston, they surveyed college kids on what they thought about NASA’s budget. The survey found that 68% of college kids thought that NASA’s budget was double what it is actually at, as a percent of the federal budget. Of those 68%, 52% overestimated NASA’s budget by at least 10 times as much (Steinberg 2013). This is obviously a huge problem as citizens put pressure on their representatives to do what they want. If the vast majority do not know what NASA’s budget actually is it leads to disastrous results when deciding NASA’s budget because people will want to lower the budget when they think it is astronomically higher than it actually is. The problems of NASA’s budget being so low is not solely on the politicians, citizens are also to blame. If more citizens would become informed on the actual numbers involving NASA’s budget public perception would greatly change. Many citizens will see, through the news, that a project NASA is doing costs millions of dollars. To an individual millions is a lot of money so they assume that NASA is being overfunded, when in reality for the federal budget millions is not a large part of the pie. The problem of NASA’s budget still exists because many people are not informed as they should
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
In his article he takes into account that, although NASA has made many discoveries, it is still not worth the amount that we spend to produce those discoveries. Yost believes that we should be more focused on the lives of our own people, than trying to “plant flags on planets”. The money can be put into other matter such as “MIT tuition” and “feeding and clothing the homeless”, which is much more beneficial than NASA’s results. Yost believes that we need to get it out of our head that someday the earth will inevitably explode, instead we should inspire children to believe that “human life on earth is sustainable” (Yost). Although Keith Yost provides a convincing argument through his use of counter-arguments, he relies too much on pathos rather than logos to support his claims, and displays frequent use of logical fallacies, making his argument
Many other scientists agreed, leading to the 2013 protests ‘Stand Up For Science’, calling for the “open communication of publicly funded science to the public, use of the best available science and evidence to make decisions and the funding of all scientific research”. However the Harper government insisted their government’s priority was getting “independent science into the public domain”. Dr. Peter Phillips, a specialist in public policy and science from the University of Saskatchewan finds nothing wrong with the media protocol stating, “ it is not the role of government scientists to speak out to the public, but rather work behind the scenes to advise politicians. It is up to the politicians to make decisions, and the voters will hold them to
He argued that science is essential to our understanding of the world and plays a crucial role in shaping our society. He stressed that science should be a public trust and that it is the responsibility of scientists to use their knowledge for the benefit of humanity. He supported his argument with a variety of examples, including the role of science in creating new technologies and in solving important social problems. He also spoke about the importance of international cooperation and the role of scientists in working together to create a better
The Space Race had an enormous impact on the way people viewed the world and changed the way the United States approached education. Science and math began to be encouraged in schools, NASA was founded and saw a massive increase in funding within nine years, and scientific achievements were more common than ever before. The Race took place between 1957 and 1975, and the world saw a large amount of technological and scientific advancements during this time. Ten years after The Cold War had started, the Soviet Union decides to launch their first satellite called Sputnik into space. In fear of the Soviets taking control of space, the United States scrambles to put a rocket of their own into space.
... We will spend an additional $9.8 billion to incarcerate our fellow Americans"(Freidman 16). With this absurd sum of money, you could buy a plane skip the private jet, a 747 to yourself. But, what if the government had this extra money? They could add to NASA's annual budget and possibly fast-track the Mars expedition.
For example,”time wasted counting them could add up to over two hundred million dollars per year.” And again the number could easily go up in the next few years. Also,”eliminated the penny will help same more money. That money could go to the U.S. military or NASA. Furthermore,”the losses have been mounting up twenty seven point four million dollars in 2010, and 19.8 million in 2009.”
“Nothing can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal; nothing on earth can help the man with the wrong mental attitude” - Thomas Jefferson. This quote is most notably upheld by famed astronomer and astrophysicist Neil Degrasse Tyson, who pushes through each day with the goal of not only doing his best for the good of science, but for the common good of the people. His achievements involving things like recording information found by the Hubble Telescope and other large scientific missions have thrust the country forward in terms of knowledge and innovation. After examining the life of Neil Degrasse Tyson, one could only admit the impact he has made on modern society because of his scientific achievements and his selfless desire to teach the general public not only to learn about space, but to be curious about everything, has been astronomical.
People today can already see the social impacts that technology has had on there lives today, when comparing them to 5 to 10 years ago. Engineers and scientist are already trying to figure how to program our laws into robots and make them as safe as possible to be around humans. But with programmers trying to make robots as humanly possibly it does make you question and rethink yourself as to what direction is technology heading towards. The aspects of this essay brings up not just the currents issues but also further issues that we may have over natural resources. To build more technology, you need more minerals and much of today’s minerals are controlled by foreign countries.
29 June 2014. Author, journalist, and filmmaker, Piers Bizony in his side of the article “For and Against:Space Exploration” argues that the exploration of space is not a waste of funds,and should continue to fund it. He supports this claim by explaining the benefit of continuing to fund them and their mission. Mr.Bizony next proceeds to show they ensure not only the improvement but also the development of technology, among companies
1. Describe the invention The International Space Station is a large spacecraft. It orbits around Earth every 90 minutes, going 5 miles per second!! It is used to gather research that could not be done on earth and is a home to many astronauts when they go into space.
Introduction The world has seen a lot, but space exploration has had the most significant effect on the world since sugar. The space race and things like the Sputnik change the way the world thinks. While space exploration can be very expensive, space exploration has had the greatest effect on the world because it has exponentially changed the world in education, culture, global challenges, and has created life changing innovations for many people. The thought of "discovery" and "exploration" Space exploration has been the best thing since sugar because it brought the world together.
Is Major Exploration Worth the Risk? Millions of dollars are constantly being invested into major exploration, but is it worth the risk? Some may say that the major exploration isn’t worth the risk because explorers may die while exploring. Those explorers were innocent people, and exploration meant that their lives would be put at risk. On the other hand, others may dispute that major exploration benefitted the people more than it harmed them.
Introduction Once a government monopoly, today space travel has now been expanded to private corporations. The resulting pros and cons have left the international community with questions to answer and decisions to make on the use of private companies in space. The privatization of space endeavors have brought on exciting new opportunities.
Space has helped hone the skills of scientist. By using satellite technology for space, they were able to use the same concept for Earth. Even with all the benefits of space, its major down falls are cost, risks, and low chances of reward for their efforts. Many space explorations cost fortunes with little to come out of it, making it almost seem not worth it. The risk is another key factor, with little known about the majority of space, many outliers can appear out of nowhere and can cause death to anyone that happens to be working up there.