A new ministry! Well you waited long enough! My prayer is that I will not disappoint you as a preacher or as a pastor. As part of my ministry I hope to produce a regular newsletter containing a pastor’s message as well as items of current news relevant to the life of the congregation and also news from the broader Christian community in the world.
Concerning the ancient city of Nineveh, there is an intriguing phrase in Jonah 4:11 ….Nineveh, that great city, wherein are more than six score thousand persons that cannot discern between their right hand and their left hand…..
Some take this to refer to infants too young to understand life and conduct. However, it could equally refer to citizens completely incapable of recognizing right from
…show more content…
We also found the lack of public outcry equally puzzling. Only now is there some opposition to this legislation being heard. Yet this must be the worst interference of family affairs ever legislated in a democracy. It is quite outrageous that any government would violate the privacy of domestic families in this manner.
Just as disturbing is the readiness by which society has accepted the validity of homosexual marriage. In living memory its associated practice was abhorrent in the eyes of decent citizens; whereas nowadays its normalization and full social acceptance is a fait accompli. We feel like asking our fellow citizens what Paul asked the Galatians: who has bewitched you?
So what happens to any society that loses its moral compass? It is foolish to assume that the public and political leaders will ultimately know when to put the brakes on; that they are bound to say at some stage: this far and no further. Once a society deviates from standards established by God it becomes impossible to generate a moral braking system that everyone will abide by. The entire moral and ethical arena becomes subjective and citizens will be ruled by the loudest voices and by the most persistent and sophisticated pressure
In his essay titled Gay “Marriage”: Societal Suicide, Charles Colson discusses fervently his opposition of same-sex marriage. The essay’s main point is constructed around Colson’s belief that if same-sex marriage were to be legalized, it would decouple marriage and procreation and thus destroy the “traditional building block of human society.” He states that same-sex marriage would lead to “an explosive increase in family collapse, out-of-wedlock births - and crime.” Colson presents us with a diverse set of evidence including statistics, studies, and his firsthand experience as a prison minister.
Recently, gay marriage was legalized in all 50 states. Most Americans accept it; as America is becoming more open and tolerant of same-sex marriage. They believe that everyone should be able to love and be with whoever they want. On the other hand there are many who wholeheartedly disagree and believe that marriage is exclusively shared between a man and a woman. A county clerk in Rowan County, Kentucky with this belief refused to issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple.
Society’s opinion of morality is that everyone needs to only do what is right for the good of the
Croome writes the proposed legislation will allow “homophobia […] hate and denigration against religious or ethnic minorities, women, [and] people with disabilities,” (Croome). This invokes sympathy from the audience by highlighting the changes are against minority people groups, those unprivileged in society. The author creates the cultural representation of the marginalised as defenceless to introduce the social value of equality; he endorses the value by encouraging sympathy. Such is effective as any reader not against homophobia will surely be against xenophobia, misogyny, or ableism and it negatively portrays his opponents as condoning hate speech. On the other side of the issue of non-denominationalism, a churchly reading opposes Croome’s interpretation that a religious impunity to the current laws will cause hate and denigration, instead believing the exemption is necessary to convey scriptural teachings on family and marriage.
The essay by Peter J Gomes, titled Homophobic? Read the Bible discusses the issue of homosexuality and the bible. He argues that most homophobic people use religion and turn to the bible to prove they are right as a weapon of hatred against homosexuals. I believe Gomes is trying to explain the real meaning behind what the bible states, and wants to educate people who use the bible against others of sexual orientations and sexuality. Peter J. Gomes stated in this essay says, “Fortunately, those who speak for the religious right do not speak for all American Christians, and the Bible is not theirs alone to interpret” (Homophobic?
Haley Salava 9 February 2016 Dr. Pamental Paper 1 Divine Command Theory When it comes to defining morality and establishing the difference between right and wrong, there are several different approaches. One might ask who is responsible for distinguishing between right and wrong and ultimately what is moral and immoral. Is this concept different between individuals? Is it different between cultures?
When debating the legalization of same sex marriage, religious reasoning and accusations of bigotry often provoke obstinance. Instead of reiterating those arguments, William J. Bennett, a prominent cultural conservative, former secretary of education, and author of The Book of Virtues, focuses on societal effects in his op-ed article, “Against Gay Marriage.” Though Bennett’s piece conveys partiality, it also attempts to discuss this issue scrupulously to ensure readers will consider his argument and perhaps accept his implications. While some of Bennett’s word choices convey tolerance of the gay community, his rhetoric incites readers to accept that preserving society requires marginalizing homosexuals.
Overall, immorality causes a society to collapse, whether because it divides the people or unites them under the immorality. A divided society will collapse because of disputes and
The lawful acknowledgment of same-sex organizations has turn into a standout amongst the most critical issues in LGBT political issues. Same-sex associations and gay relation unions turned into the center of LGBT political issues in America and worldwide in the second a large portion of the 1990s. The qualification between lawfully perceived associations and relational unions is being verbalized as well as has usual significance. The term gay marriage signifies not just the need for lawful regulation of gay connections, but additionally highlights the disparities in the social regulation of homo- and heterosexuality. Supporters of
Is it unsettling that there is no uniformity of laws regarding gay marriage across the United States? Some states allow gay marriage, some allow civil unions, and some states allow no form of homosexual domestic partnerships, at least not ones recognized formally. What does that mean for homosexual Americans? Does the pending repeal of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” military policy make students feel more optimistic about rights for gay people in America?
This contributes to a regulatory state and controlling authoritative figures. The end result of this is a stagnated society, which is intolerant of the free expression of one’s individuality and ultimately limits the advancement of society. Blind acceptance of traditions and strict social conformity can lead to the
Considering the political issues today same-sex marriage controversy serves to be significant as it has not been able to reach its height at the national level. As only 36 states out of 50 legally approve of same-sex marriage (Fausset and Blinder, The NewYork Times.com). Amending the Constitution for same-sex marriage serves to be a huge controversy and a difficult process due to many opinions present within the political and social circuit. Another reason many citizens do not support the idea of same-sex marriage is due to traditional social beliefs and morals. For example, many Americans oppose the idea of same-sex marriage on religious grounds.
In the book of God, The Bible, there is a set of rules that people in today’s society take quite literally. Humans follow this set of rules in fear of the consequences if they rebel, like in the book of Genesis. She shows that humans move as a herd, doing the things that benefit the majority under the control of the rules that were made by a man or woman no different than anyone else. Le Guin brings light to the oversight of this issue, people do not realize the utilitarian society that has fallen into place. People put up blockers to ignore the bad in the world so they can keep their Eden.
Joey Cho Mrs. Middleton English 10 17 October 2016 Persuasive Research Essay Outline Introduction LGBT/ same-sex marriage is one of the most heated and controversial debates in our current society. Unlike the past thousands of years whereas marriage was defined as a legal union between a man and a woman, now the concept of marriage has been extended to a broader context. “Homosexuality” in most cultures is viewed as a disgrace, and it is often considered as a great sin from a religious aspect.
Perry we see the issue regarding the major political issue of the legalization of same-sex marriages. While some individuals rebuke or chastise homosexuality, other individuals will embrace it as just another aspect of life a average norm to be. We must questions the reason for the early determination of same sex marriage constitutionality. When it comes down to it, our society is just making it illegal for people that live their lives differently from the majority of us. It is inequitable for our government to decide on whether or not homosexuals can be married.