Napoleon Bonaparte has always been seen as a tyrant, but he has made many positive impacts on the world. Napoleon rose to power after the French Revolution. There, Napoleon would become a genius general and later he would appoint himself Emperor of France. Napoleon Bonaparte used his power to impact the modern world through the Napoleonic Wars, the sale of Louisiana Purchase to the United States of America, and the Napoleonic Code. Napoleon Bonaparte emerged from the chaos that divided France and threw much of Europe into turmoil.
There were two Revolutions that are connected, The French Revolution and the American Revolution. The American Revolution came first, and the French Revolution was inspired by the American Revolution. George Washington was one of the main leaders in the American revolution. He led the colonies and future United States to a victory over the British government. The leader of the French Revolution was Napoleon Bonaparte.
Napoleon attempted to gain trust in order to convince his people that he always had their best interest at heart. However, the fact that Napoleon made an effort to raise his public image is all well and good, but did it work? According to Geoffrey Ellis, the majority of French people thought very highly of Napoleon: "All presented him as a ruler of unrivaled intelligence and wisdom, as a force for good, for necessary change, who swept away the last corrupt vestiges of the old regime in France." Napoleon began his rule in 1796 near the end of the French Revolution – a time period in which thousands of French citizens were executed by the government. When he rose to power, French citizens believed that Napoleon was the person who was finally going to pull their country out of political turmoil.
Blood of Tyrants: George Washington & the Forging of the Presidency by Logan Beirne is a fascinating investigation on the original meaning of the commander in chief clause in the U.S. Constitution, and its direct applicability to contemporary debates. Such debates include the ways that successive presidents have exercised their power as commander in chief. Beirne looks to the nation’s first commander in chief, George Washington, for insight into how best to assess these debates. Blood of Tyrants centers around General Washington’s crucial role during the American Revolutionary War and how his wartime precedents influenced the meaning of the commander in chief clause. Beirne believes that this early history is of great importance on how the president, the Congress, and the Supreme Court interpret the powers of the
Otto von Bismarck used political wit and risk-taking to facilitate efforts towards German unification. Through Realpolitik, “...the pursuit of a Nation’s self-interest based on a realistic assessment of costs and consequences of action.” A political theory in which realistic, practical strategies are utilized over strategies of ideological or moral consideration. Because Realpolitik in a doctrine that acts in the self-interest of the state, it is qusai-nationalistic. Through Realpolitik, Bismarck gained significant leverage over Austria in the Schleswig-Holstein Question, the Austro-Prussian War of 1866, and considerable leverage over France in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71. Following the Franco-Prussian War, King Wilhelm I of Prussia proclaimed the German Empire, officially unifying the German states into one under Prussian political structure that also juxtaposed Conservative Nationalism and
Earlier today, I heard about Napoleon, a French military leader and emperor. Napoleon, had major military success across Europe and expanded his empire. Napoleon also reformed the revolution by making changes with the laws, government, and especially education. I 'm glad that Napoleon is also focused on education, so therefore I may attend school, thanks to him because he has constructed many schools. This led to the sis of democracy since his nationalism gave people the idea, that they can revolt and create their own democratic government.
In 1776 in Virginia he met Thomas Jefferson at a Convention Center, where they both became very good friends. Codependently Madison became president in 1808 right after his very good friend Thomas Jefferson. Before becoming president James Madison wrote drafts for individual freedoms and other sources. I believe Madison was a good influence and example setting goals for himself and accomplishing them. Some accomplishments were graduating from Princeton University, but a major accomplishment was becoming president of the United States in 1808.
Andre Fleche’s first-rate study of how the European revolutions of 1848 influenced the American Civil War arrives amidst recent calls by scholars to internationalize the history of America’s great conflict.  Fleche argues that the legacy of the 1848 revolutions influenced Union and Confederate conceptions of nationalism, as the competing sides participated in the “transatlantic dialogue” (p. 3) over the definition of the modern nation-state. Americans believed that their revolution provided an example for the world, and used the success or failures of subsequent European revolutionary struggles to measure the viability of American republicanism as a world model. The continental breadth of the 1848 revolutions, in addition to the thousands of influential European immigrants that came to America in their wake, made these revolutions the most salient for American observers. Fleche contends that examining the Civil War
Nationalism was closely tied to liberalism in that exponentials of both ideologies demanded far reaching political change that threatened the state system of Central Europe. Nationalism is the belief that one’s greatest loyalty should not be to a king or empire but to a nation of people who share a common culture language and history .Nationalism touched nearly every country in Europe in the first half of the 19thCentuary but it was not until after 1848 that it really began to At the Congress of Vienna in 1815, representatives from all the allies who had defeated Napoleon Austria, Russia, Prussia and Great Britain came together to try and provide a long term peace plan for Europe. They hoped that by settling the issues that had arouse during the French Revolution and the Napoleonic wars that they could stop Europe being shaken by further Revolutions. They drew a map of Europe that lasted for several generations. “What became known as the Congress system restored the principle of dynastic legitimacy and the balance of international power in Europe” .
It held an important place in the chaos that was to in-sue in 19th century Europe, as it swept across the continent transforming each of the countries. Some new nations, such as Germany and Italy were formed by uniting smaller states with a common "national identity". Others, were fueled by it to win their independence, such as Romania, Greece, Poland and Bulgaria. Before the butterfly flapped its wings, the only topic that could link a nation together was the belief of a monarchy and how it was the duty of a citizen to serve their king. The first source given is a painting showcasing the storming of Bastille by the national assembly.
To D’lorenzo these ideas would get in the way of a total free market, and reminded him more of Imperial Europe than the United States that the Founding Fathers wanted to create (one based on as much economic freedom as possible). This to me is very valid. Lincoln’s platform is derived from the Whig party as he was once one. Lincoln also supported many protectionist style Tariffs such as both Morrill Tariffs. To D’Lorenzo these were against the founding fathers
Thomas Jefferson and James Madison also sustained France. In 1800, Jefferson was elected president after an unpleasant political campaign towards Adams. For the first time, strength become transferred peacefully from one party to another. There were many issues that happen in the Battle of New Orleans like when Pakenham was murdered by the Jackson forces. The issues formed the focus of new political parties which began to emerge in the decade after the Battle of New Orleans.
The US was not always as big and powerful as it is today; there was a long journey to come this far. The US was a democratic republic and was built on a foundation consisting of a representative government that promotes individual freedom and liberty. As they strived to compete with the powerful nations of Europe on their way to becoming a world power, they had to abandon their isolationist ways and move toward a policy of imperialism. Their military and economic conquests showed a disregard for those very foundations with which their country was built upon. The way the Native Americans were treated dates back to Indian Removal Act of 1830.
The perspective is from caricaturist James Gillray, as a caricaturist, he would have satirical views on the European governments during the French Revolution. The source connects to imperialism because Europe lays claims on land that belonged to indigenous and non-indigenous people, often resulting in war and later on political control. Next, the intended audience for Source #1 is for the
Regardless of who writes the biographies and reflections—whether by its winners or its losers—shifts in values over time make objectivity difficult. Without sufficient education on a subject, one manages by rumors and hearsay; but upon learning of a humanizing anecdote, one then realizes that the monster he or she had expected is complicated and, perhaps, redeemable. In the case of Napoleon Bonaparte, however, there are many parties involved in his discussion who hold many opinions and write many books to prove them. The French, as is expected, look up to the man who both won them their revolution and brought their country into a golden age. The British, however, warred with Napoleon, taking every precaution necessary to assassinate his character despite the growing favor of his progressive republicanism and human rights sympathies.