ID: 1B6048
Describe the characteristics of someone you consider a leader. In what ways might this person rely on his personal qualities to influence and motivate?
I. Introduction
Any person who is willing to become a leader in a collective or group must have several characteristics of a leader. Leader’s characteristic is determining the role of the leader, explains, why someone become a leader, when others following him. Leader’s characteristic is a complex of psychological characteristic, abilities and skills to cooperate with group, who are able to provide a successful implementation of goals and functions.
Napoleon Bonaparte a first Imperator of France has had the characteristics of a leader, was very active and self-confident person. It is almost more than two hundred years left after his death, but even today, many researchers interested in Bonaparte’s personality.
The purpose of this paper is to analyze a leader’s characteristics of Napoleon Bonaparte, by applying the Fiedler’s Contingency Theory of Leadership. We are interested on the issue of what kind of
…show more content…
Under this theory, the main contingencies, main relevance in identifying successful leadership, are the relationship between leader and subordinate, using the level of friendliness, trust, initiative and cooperation. It is also show the structure of instruction, generated by the facts and feature of what must be done (Hal, 2014. p.339). The definition of leadership which we are trying to show is considered more than once by many researchers, such as Rost (1993), Barker (2002), Winston. According to Winston (2006): “A leader is one or more people who selects, equips, trains, and influences one or more follower(s) who have diverse gifts, abilities, and skills and focuses the follower(s) to the organization’s mission and
Being a leader is the ability to motivate and inspire. Like, Odysseus who traveled for 20 years after the Trojan War and tries to return to Ithaca while facing many challenges. Also, like Martin Luther King Jr who gave powerful protests and speeches to persuade and express his ideas to his followers. These two leaders show many qualities that make a good leader. Leadership qualities such as wisdom, self-control, and bravery support a good leader.
After the downfall of King Louis XVI and the terrible reign of Robespierre, a French military general by the name of Napoleon Bonaparte stepped up to lead France. During his reign as both a military leader and emperor of France, Napoleon was the recipient of both praise and criticism. To some, Napoleon was a tyrant that did not rule well, but to many others, Napoleon was a fair leader and was even considered a hero. Although Napoleon Bonaparte made a few mistakes during his regime as a leader, I feel like his changes to France have been more helpful than harmful. Before Napoleon became emperor, he was a young military general who helped achieve victories in many battles, such as leading the French army to wins against both Austria and Great Britain.
In leadership, there are three main scientific paradigms that lay in a leader; trait, behaviour and contingency which has extended into numerous styles. The scientific paradigm includes autocratic, democratic, participative, directive, task-oriented, relation-oriented, transformational and transactional, charismatic, laissez-faire and servant leadership (Hassan, Asad & Hoshina, 2016, pg. 162). Besides, leadership trait which identifies personality traits, such as introversion, often bring into the cooperation of the leader emergence and effective (Clack 2017, pg. 2). Typically, leadership trait theory is not used alone because the good leadership does not easily arise from inherit genetic traits without taking into consideration and motivation,
Leadership is the process by which a person exerts influence over his followers and inspires, motivates, and directs their activities to help achieve group or organizational goals. Bernard Montgomery, British Field Marshal also defined leadership as “the capacity and will to rally men and women to a common purpose and the character which inspires confidence”. The follower is someone who agrees with the beliefs of others, or listens to the leader or commands another. The success or failure of organizations can be attributed partly to how well a leader leads, and/or how well a follower follows the leader.
In developing this paper on leadership, I examined what was most important to me as a leader. As I reflected on my leadership philosophy, I thought about my experiences and the principals that I have learned through my own self-discovery and the observation of other leaders that I have had throughout my life. My leadership philosophy paper will focus on what leadership is to me, core values, and knowledge of others. In thinking about my definition of leadership, I thought of what was most important to me in and as a leader.
Each powerful leader has their strengths, weaknesses, and downfalls. Napoleon was not exempt, his strengths and weaknesses were evident, and even the greatest soldier in France’s history was not immune to a catastrophic downfall. From a young age, Napoleon took an interest in politics and militant tactics.
It is hard to deny that the world wouldn’t have reached the state it is now in without great historical contributions of people. Since the ancient times, people have been the power shaping the world and pushing it forward on the way of development and progress. History knows a great number of people, who produced much impact on progress, culture and political arena. Thereby, among the remarkable political figures of the past, the personality of Napoleon Bonaparte holds a very special place, for the contribution of this controversial and complex person to global culture and history is difficult to overrate. Living between 1769 and 1821, Napoleon Bonaparte was a great military commander and a prominent diplomat.
Leadership is an abstract term that constantly evolves. Leadership and its definition adapt to each situation through the assistance of its users in order to influence progress. Because of its ambiguity, interpreting leadership produces useful definitions when viewed within context. Exploring Leadership, a book directed towards college students, discusses the historical views of Leadership and its development over time. The aforementioned book provides the information that constitutes the foundation of this paper and its definition of leadership.
Those individuals who were believed to have these inherent skills were people of very influential status, wartime heroes and those of great wealth. The people who emerge or are most picked to lead have distinctive drives and character profiles (Nicholson, 2013, p.16). Leadership Thought Development from 1900 – 1970 The thought of leadership evolved from the Great Man Theory to Trait Theory and Behavior Theory. The trait theory focuses on identifying distinctive personality traits and characteristics that are associated to successful leadership.
Leadership Analysis Introduction One of the popular definitions of a leader is, "The only definition of a leader is someone who has followers." ( ) A more comprehensive definition that highlights striking features of a leader is, "A simple definition of leadership is that leadership is the art of motivating a group of people to act towards achieving a common goal.” ( ) A closer scrutiny of the characteristics of an influential leader would many ways assist one, in recognizing those attributes in an attempt to assimilate the best in others.
Leadership has been defined in a variety of ways, there are multiple authors and theorists who have tried to define and understand leadership, all leading to varying theories and conclusions, but one thing that is universally understood is the importance of effective leadership and how someone with good leadership skills can impact so many people around them. (Kakabadse and Kakabadse, 1999; Yukl, 2002; Northouse,2013) The main components that have been identified to play a role in leadership are relations between leader and subordinates, interaction form between leader and followers, the influence that the leader has, the way in which the leader behaves and finally a leader’s traits. (Yukl, 2002) These elements that make up a leader, are then used as building blocks to identify the way in which each specific leader deals with its followers.
This paper will examine the three leadership theories, identify how they apply to my practice, and explore how these theories interact with each other. The Trait Leadership Theory is based on the belief that a person is born with special traits contributing to natural leadership abilities. Studies of famous historical leaders have been used to identify various traits for this theory. Although the list of traits differs from study to study, there are five major traits that are consistent throughout most studies.
In conclusion, there are many different characteristics that make a good leader. There are a variety of different approaches to leadership, but those who succeed in their leadership role are very likely to exhibit the characteristics that we have discussed her. A good leader has commitment and a positive attitude, knows how to delegate, can communicate effectively and is prepared to actively lead a
This paper is going to encompass different leadership theories and their relevance to my own personal personality and method of leadership. There will be information on the advantages and disadvantages of the leadership theories and information on each including examples. The purpose of this paper is to view various kinds of leadership theories and apply them to a real-life scenario. Leadership Theories There are quite a few different leadership theories available for people to take information from and use in business settings and even personal settings.
Leadership: Definition Leadership is the process of influencing the motive of the employees and so directing, guiding them to the proper completion of the short-term goals and the mission, vision of the firm. Leadership referring to achieve a specific set of goals of the business enterprise by minimizing risk and more advantage of opportunities is also called Entrepreneurial Leadership (Rao, 2015). Today leadership is such an iterative process when the leaders should have a variety of qualities and expertise in different area of management. Here, different theories will be explained which can clearly identify the scope, the responsibilities and the area of expertise required to be successful leader.