ipl-logo

Criminal Justice Case Study

1654 Words7 Pages

Being a criminal lawyer is not easy, nonetheless when your in the spotlight. Defending a woman accused of mass murder was proving to be harder than it looks. Though Anisia knew it would be a determining case for her career, she decided to take the chance.She had never defended anyone accused of murder,she was always taking smaller cases such as petty theft or assault. Her whole reputation as a lawyer and a person was on the line. If she were to lose the case she would be looked upon as a incapable lawyer, yet if she won she would be accused of lying and letting a guilt person free, to commit other crimes. The days leading up to the day of the trial were brutal. Many sleepless nights spent doing research and preparing questions for the district …show more content…

Anisia had been so confident in the case that she hadn't even gotten a material witness, she was solely depending on her facts to win the case. The defense on the other hands had many witnesses but none could prove that Vanessa was guilty, their witnesses seemed to help Anisias side of the argument. Once both sides were done questioning, the jury ordered a recess for the jury to discuss their final verdict. Walking back into the courtroom made Anisia almost nauseous, the buildup seemed to be almost too much for Anisia. “Has the jury reached a verdict?” The judge asked “Yes, your honour.” “On the count of Murder in the 1st degree how do you find the defendant?” “We find the defendant Not …show more content…

Many others in the courtroom disagreed and had angry outbursts and breakdowns, they were all removed from the courtroom. Though it made Anisia happy, it made her more cautious because she was still feeling uneasy about the man that was staring at her. She managed to put her feelings aside and Vanessa thanked her . She got her papers and briefcase and started heading to her car. Anisia was desperate to just relax for a while, she had been nonstop preparing for the trial. But when she got outside the courtroom there was news reporters and interviewers taking pictures and bombarding her with questions. She simply kept her head up and continued walking to her car. She calmly started her drive

Show More
Related

  • What Is Ariel Tritondatter Case

    153 Words  | 1 Pages

    On November 19, 1898, Ariel Tritondatter was arrested on the felony charges of first- degree murder and breaking & entering. An arraignment was later held on November 22, 1898, which Ariel Tritondatter was informed about the charges she was faced with. Additionally, Ariel Tritondatter soon entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity Ariel Tritondatter’s criminal trial was set in the Circuit Court with both a jury and a judge called “Syed Ahmed Khan”. The defendant, Ariel Tritondatter, almost didn’t converse throughout the trial, but soon she took a stand to defend herself.

    Read More

  • Why Is Ruby Adams Trial Wrong

    669 Words  | 3 Pages

    I feel as if there may have been more to it than what she said in her trial, but who knows. Maybe she finally had enough of the racism and Dr. Adams and wanted him and everyone else to know it. I can’t help but wonder if this same case happened today, with different people, what the outcome would

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Adam Robinson Case

    1125 Words  | 5 Pages

    First she declared that the burden of proof was on the defendant. With a lack of solid evidence, the prosecutor attempted to then try and get the defendant to prove his defense since it was all based on accusations at that point. The defense was stating that it was all staged by the mother, who was suspected to be mentally ill. The prosecution denied that claim and said that the defense was arguing matters outside and unrelated to the case, when in fact it could have been related to the case as a solid defense. When the time came for the witnesses to be brought forward and testify, the prosecutor vouched for the witnesses.

    Read More

  • Lizzie Borden Guilty

    146 Words  | 1 Pages

    Lizzie Bordens case left the world shocked and confused. People didn't know what to believe since there was lack of forensic evidence making it harder for police to convict her of the murder. In court, A.V. Jennings (Lizzie Borden's Defense) argued, “there is not one particle of direct evidence in this case from beginning to end against Lizzie A. Borden. There is not a spot of blood, there is not a weapon they have connected with her in any way, shape or fashion.” Some people still believed she was guilty and never accepted her in the community.

    Read More

  • What Was The 1954 Trial Of Marilyn Sheppard

    1287 Words  | 6 Pages

    Having the media take over and “become” the judicial system of this case was the number one mistake that was made during this trial. There is not much that anyone can do to stop the media from covering the story but there was something the court system to do to protect the jury, all the officials, and even Dr. Sheppard himself. The media was such an influence; they were pressuring the police and the court system to arrest and convict

    Read More

  • Michael Morton Research Paper

    817 Words  | 4 Pages

    The prosecutor, speaking to the jury in emotional terms with tears streaming down his face, laid out a graphic, depraved sexual scenario, accusing Morton of bludgeoning his wife for refusing to have sex on his birthday. "There was no scientific evidence, there was no eyewitness, there was no murder weapon, there was no believable motive," Morton says. "... I didn't see how any rational, thinking person would say that's enough for a guilty verdict."

    Read More

  • Anthony V. State Of Florida Case No. 5D11-2357

    416 Words  | 2 Pages

    The prosecution did not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt; thus, justice was not served for the real victim, Caylee. Although Casey Anthony won in a court of law, she lost in the court of public opinion; thus, being punished by society just as OJ was. References Anthony v State of Florida Case No. 5D11-237 (FL Dist. 5 Ct.

    Read More

  • Abigail Williams The Crucible Essay

    811 Words  | 4 Pages

    In order for the court to believe that she is innocent she carries on her act and even turns on one of the girls. She chooses to lie and bring others down just to protect herself from the real

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Mary Barnett's Guilty Of Second Degree Murder And Manslaughter

    1143 Words  | 5 Pages

    She knew exactly what she did and wanted someone to find Alison. Then after she returns home and calls the police it is one lie after another. She is not credible and cannot be taken for what she says at the

    Read More

  • Juror 8 Vs Antigone

    896 Words  | 4 Pages

    Juror Nine votes not guilty because he admires Juror Eight for standing alone against the majority. Once the jurors start to discuss the case again Juror Seven questions who else would have the motive to kill this boy’s father. Juror Eight rebuts by saying, “As far as I know, we’re supposed to decide whether or not the boy on trial is guilty. We’re not concerned with anyone else’s motives here” (Rose 240).

    Read More

  • Ethos Pathos Logos

    881 Words  | 4 Pages

    The rhetorical analysis of the court document “Kinkel vs The State of Oregon”. The document was written to explain the arguments of both sides of the court and to justify the decision made by the court and the judge through facts and rhetorical accounts of events that transpired. The judge clearly uses Ethos, Logos, and Pathos within the analysis which is used to his advantage. There are many audiences involved in the court and trial. There is the defendants and the victim’s family members present.

    Read More

  • Fallacies In 12 Angry Men

    1404 Words  | 6 Pages

    The script introduces the viewers to the typical behavior and the state of mind of these jurors, who surprisingly turn out to be the last to change their opinions from “guilty” to “not guilty”. Juror#3 the frustrated father whose personal conflicts and experiences influence his view of the accused’s crime is very desperate to make it clear that his mind is already made up before the deliberations even start. Similar

    Read More

  • 12 Angry Men Interview Analysis

    1139 Words  | 5 Pages

    No. 8: Yes, I do… [sighing and shaking head slowly] It was hard and some of the jurors were just hard headed, we were starting to think that we were a hung jury but in the end, we came to a unanimous conclusion that the boy is not guilty. Interviewer: One last thing, do you have any problems or opinions with today’s jury system?

    Read More

  • 12 Angry Men Murder Scene Analysis

    851 Words  | 4 Pages

    Whichever way you decide, the verdict must be unanimous. I urge you to deliberate honestly and thoughtfully. You are faced with a grave responsibility. Thank you, gentlemen” (Judges Voice). The jury enters the jury room and twelve men shuffle in.

    Read More

  • Criminology Case Study Examples

    1692 Words  | 7 Pages

    Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher Name Academic Institution Author Note Class Professor Date TABLE OFCONTENTS1 CASE/OFFENDER 3 OFFENSE/CRIME 4 MOTIVATIONS/BACKGROUND 4 THEORY 5 VICTIMS 6 COSTS 7 ADJUDICATION/DISPOSITION (PROSECUTION/SENTENCING) 7 CONCLUSION 8 REFERENCES 10 Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher

    Read More

More about Criminal Justice Case Study

Open Document