Several coffee corporations have been accused of violating ethical standards. According to National Center for Public Policy Research v. Starbucks Corporation (2022), the National Center for Public Policy Research has sued Starbucks, claiming their diversity initiatives amount to racial discrimination. The lawsuit challenges hiring goals, contract awards, and executive pay tied to diversity, alleging violations of civil rights laws. The case seeks to void diversity policies and demands damages. Starbucks had not responded to the lawsuit at the time of reporting.
Using Derrick Bell Critical Race Theory (CRT), we can analyse discrimination in the coffee industry involves examining how race intersects with power dynamics, organizational culture, and ethical conduct (Smith & Jones, 2023). The low representation of racial minorities in top executive and board positions at Starbucks raises concerns about the organization's ability to incorporate diverse perspectives and experiences at the highest decision-making levels (Smith & Jones, 2023). The theory emphasizes assessing power imbalances, such as representation in leadership and resource allocation.
…show more content…
1999). According to Lawrence III, (1993), the lawsuit filed by the National Center for Public Policy Research against Starbucks Corporation is based on the principle of colour blindness, which is a central tenet of classical liberalism. The lawsuit alleges that Starbucks Corporation has discriminated against black customers by denying them service and by profiling them as potential shoplifters. The lawsuit argues that these actions violate the principles of classical liberalism and that Starbucks Corporation should be held
In the present business world, companies strive to be so politically correct, ethical, and unbiased that is seems ludicrous that language bias could still be a problem. In Lisa Scherzer’s article titled ”Workers Sue Target for Racially Offensive Document”, the author reveals that the usage of language bias is still an issue, even in large companies such as Target. While the document was not meant to be circulated outside of management, its apparition raises awareness concerning the racial slurs, stereotypes, and racist humor utilized by Target’s management against Hispanic employees. First, language bias appears in the form of racially charged words was used by Target’s management. One of the plaintiffs claims that the management team uses ethnic slurs, such as the term “wetback”, when addressing Mexican employees (Scherzer).
The City of New Haven, Connecticut, in 2003, had vacant positions within their Fire Department. The City desired to fill these positions and pursued a means to identify internal candidates for promotional opportunities. Charles E. Mitchell (2013) writes, “The City hired Industrial /Organization Solutions, Inc. (IOS) to develop and administer its examination at a cost of $100,000.000. IOS took painstaking efforts to design and develop a test that was fair, job related, and consistent with business necessity” (p. 45). The examination outcome indicated that the white candidates had done far better than the minority candidates.
James Beard Award-winning food critic Todd Kliman and award-winning chef Marcus Samuelsson discuss how racial segregation affects restaurants. Todd Kliman 's article, “Coding and Decoding Dinner” in Oxford American magazine, looks that ways in which restaurants are racially divided in Washington, D.C. and elsewhere. Marcus Samuelsson will share his perspective as owner of Red Rooster Harlem.
Josh Feuerstein, a former pastor living in Arizona, made a video to insult the red cups from Starbucks. In his video he talks about how Starbucks doesn 't have a Christmas look to it so that means that Starbucks is against
In David Masci article we are introduced to the theory of how racial discrimination is alive in the workforce. The article begins with a specific example, an African American women who has worked hard to advance in her employment but is held back simply because of the color of her skin. Masci’s claims and arguments are supported thoroughly with actual statistics and examples from modern society. Through his use of pathos, logos, and ethos Masci is able to structure a feeling of action, in order to recognize differences among black employees, and the amount of extra work is needed from them to advance to a position that is still held my limitations of white supremacy in America. “Discrimination still exist even if it is masked well” (7), Masci leaves no confusion to his readers it is clear and problematic that issues that black people face in the workplace are hidden to not be recognized but instead restricted by higher power and who can take those positions.
This resurgence highlights the continued importance of discussing race in the context of social inequality, discrimination, and violence. As social scientists have argued, race must be retained and utilized in our explanations of these phenomena. The reemergence of race as a key concept in contemporary popular culture suggests that there is still much work to be done in terms of creating a more just and equitable society. Only by acknowledging and addressing the ways in which race impacts our society can we hope to move towards a more equitable future. It is crucial, then, that we continue to explore and engage with the concept of race in order to better understand and challenge the systems of power that perpetuate social inequality.
The Intersection of White Privilege and Structural Racism in American Society Garrett Hamer Sociology 3 Professor Akihiko Hirose 5/19/2023 Abstract This paper will explore the concept of white privilege and its bindings to structural racism. White privilege refers to the societal advantages and benefits that white people receive due to their skin color, often unconsciously. Structural racism refers to the systematic ways in which racial inequality is embedded in institutions and policies.
Institutional racism is inevitable in the United States. Institutional racism is constantly occurring, whether it be in the work force, schools, or the criminal justice system. The color of one’s skin is a determining factor for his success in a company, and whether or not he ends up in the court systems, and for how long. Although laws such as the Thirteenth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, and Fifteenth Amendment have been put in place to avoid racism in America and give black people equal rights, institutional racism is still holding African Americans back.
The article Critical Race Theory: An Introduction did a great job explaining in detail what critical race theory was. Offering Jean Harris personal experience, made the reader understand the limited amount of minority readings. Although it lacked information concerning the relationship CRT had to other previous movements and philosophers. Aside from this, the article did fulfill its purpose of informing readers of the origins of CRT and how it was a stepping stone for future developments and movements. The article WHITE PRIVILEGE, COLOR AND CRIME: A PERSONAL ACCOUNT, is an important article concerning whiteness.
This sociological analysis paper will analyze the case of Monica Harwell, who is a female of African-American origin working at the Con Edison electrical utility company. She faced discrimination from her colleagues because of the color of her skin and the fact that she was a woman. Nevertheless, despite her qualifications and her hard work to the extent of even going back to school to better her career, which made her more qualified than most of her colleagues, Monica Harwell faced a lot of discrimination amongst her work mates, her case was so severe that she would even go urinating in the woods while at work, other colleagues would speak behind her back just to make sure that she does not progress in her career, she is even reported saying
According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, “Race discrimination involves treating someone (an applicant or employee) unfavorably because he/she is of a certain race or because of personal characteristics associated with race (such as hair texture, skin color, or certain facial features).” [4] Although it is unlawful to discriminate against people of any race while hiring, employers nonetheless do so without facing any repercussions. However, as stated earlier, businesses can minimize food insecurity by implementing rigid policies and training sessions that instruct and teach staff members to not indirectly discriminate against people based on their racial background during the interview process. “Organizations are relatively small, autonomous entities that afford leaders a high level of control over cultural norms and procedural rules, making them ideal places to develop policies and practices that promote racial equity.” [5] Most employees refuse to take accountability and deny that racism exists in their company, which is detrimental.
Factors that contribute to privilege, power, and oppression include who has power, how is that power being used, and what social groups are being affected. This year I began working in Target’s return department where employees are supposed to, what feels like stereotyping, call out shady and weird-acting people who are most often appearing to be houseless or on drugs. Because of certain types of individuals that frequent our story in Janzen Beach, we do not return certain products without proof of purchase. However, one day we made an exception for on customer and did not for another by a manager. Later in the day I confronted the manager and expressed my frustrations that our personal biases were getting in the way of helping our customers equally and expressed that certain people or groups are less likely to express their frustrations or ask for a manager when they are denied a return in comparison to others.
Race has always been a problem in America and other countries. But developments such as Critical Race Theory (CRT) has helped challenge race and racial power and its representation in American society. Articles such as Critical Race Theory: An Introduction by Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic; White Privilege, Color, and Crime: A Personal Account by Peggy McIntosh have helped CRT develop further. Along with the documentary White Like Me by filmmaker Tim Wise. These articles and film explore the race and racism in the United States, along with critical race theory.
Chow, Tiffany Y. “Privileged but Not in Power: How Asian American Tech Workers Use Racial Strategies to Deflect and Confront Race and Racism.” Qualitative Sociology, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 10 Jan. 2023, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9830130/. Datz, Todd. “Poll Finds That At least One Quarter of Asian Americans Report Being Personally Discriminated against in the Workplace and Housing.” News, 22 June 2018, www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/poll-asian-americans-discrimination/. Mineo, Liz. “A Long History of Bigotry against Asian Americans.”
Ethical issue in Starbucks Starbucks, an American coffeehouse chain based in Seattle, Washington, is the world largest coffee retailer chain in the world having more than 21,000 stores in 65 countries (Starbucks website, n.d.). In United States, Starbucks owned 12,973 stores (Starbucks Company Statistics, 2014), which is more than 73% of the market shares of the United States coffeehouse industry. Hence, Starbucks possesses monopoly power in the specialty coffee market. Enjoying monopoly position, Starbucks plan to completely dominate the market by eliminating competition. Starbucks engages in a range of anti-competitive activities.