He continues to support his point of view by saying “Immediately following the first attack, I implemented our government’s emergency response plans.” In the second part of the speech President Bush uses Pathos in the quote “I have directed the full resources of our intelligence and law enforcement communities to find those responsible and to bring them to justice. We will make no distinction between the terrorist who committed the act and those who harbored them.” The quote uses pathos because it makes the audience feel angry and makes them want to personally help find who attack the Twin Towers. The only fallacy that the President uses in this part of the speech is appeal to authority.
In reference to a bill introduced to Congress forbidding the use of tactics defined by torture; The United States government must consider all of the ethical options and possibilities they have. Torturing anyone is morally unethical but allowing terrorists to murder innocent civilians is against every moral we, as humans possess. As morally just people America needs to find the exceptions in which we are willing to use torture in countering terrorism. As leaders of the free world our government has the responsibility to do everything in their power to protect innocent people and gain the needed information to do so. In order to win the war on terror, officials will occasionally have no choice but to torture the terrorists withholding information to prevent these attacks on humanity.
This very easy for the colonies to do based on their shared disapproval of and abuse from Britain and its rule. The colonists believed that they had to defend their liberties and that Britain was taking these from them. Richard Henry Lee describes how the colonists want to defend these liberties as led to their unification in his letter to Arthur Lee, “N.America is now most firmly united and as firmly resolved to defend their liberties ad infiniturn against every power on Earth that may attempt to take them away” (Doc 3). This demonstrates that not only are the colonists ready to fight to attain their liberties, but work together afterwards to protect them from anyone who intends to take them, thus supporting the idea of the colonies as not thirteen individual independent states, but one unified state. This idea of a strong unification greatly supported by Document 6.
Henry used logic and common sense to persuade the colonists in his pre-Revolutionary War speech. Before the war began, Britain was shipping troops to the colonies, but claimed that they were at peace. “Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies?” (Henry 104). The
The Alien Act declared that if war sparked between the United States and another country, the President had the authority to announce the war. However, one important aspect of our Acts comprised of the nature of immigrants. We firmly believed that at times of war, all foreign males fourteen years old and older, who were not citizens of the United States, would have been removed as “alien enemies” (Alien Acts). This was necessary for the protection of our country and the success of our
Firstly, when Will said ‘To end the practice of “birthright citizenship,” all that is required is to correct the misinterpretation of that amendment first sentence’ (601). How could anybody say it was a misinterpretation on something that someone else wrote? We as a nation should look at immigrants not as a threat, but for an opportunity for a friendship. Some people might not have been able to go anywhere, so they came to America to feel relived from the stress that was put a pond them. Thus, many might not like people coming over to the “land of the free”, but what
Additionally our British allies joined us in a bombing campaign in early October 2001 once the Afghanistan regime let it be known that they wouldn’t surrender the leadership. By mid-November NATO occupied Kabul. They followed our Presidents vision, making him a visionary
The ABC published an article in May 2013 that the excessive anti – terrorism laws must go. It exclaims that the laws are a product of the hysteria which prevailed in the aftermath of major international terrorist attacks such as 9/11. (ABC, 2013) This piece exclaims the importance of creating new anti – terrorism laws, considering it has been more than a decade since our first anti – terrorism laws have been enacted. It goes on to state that there is no longer a justification for delay in reforming our anti-terrorism laws.
In conclusion, I dearly do hope that the people of America may consider my proposal. It is, dare I say, possibly the best case scenario we could hope to come up with as there is obviously no way to live peacefully with these immigrants if they do not conform. They may come here “seeking for a better life”, but we all know that is a lie; they only wish to disrupt our own lives as there is absolutely no way for people of different cultures to live side by side. Let us all come together to rid these differing cultures and keep us, the original and true
I agree with the government has access to check and collecting phone records because for me, American security is the most important situation facing the society privacy. Some of the reason why I say it is that everybody knows that government was taking access to our information long time ago. It is not a new, also I think that the principally, government doesn’t care about our lives. They just want to prevent our security of possible attacks terrorist and people, who want to cause crime; it doesn’t matter if the government just wants to save its security. Everybody should know that all government problems affect our relatively.
Every American is being monitored even without reasonable cause for the government to be monitoring them. The intentions of both acts were to monitor Americans who are supporting the terrorist and help fight the terrorist crimes within our country. The problem is that the government is over stepping that line and is monitoring everyone’s phone data. Phone data is not a reasonable source to gain suspicion of someone who a terrorist or helping a terrorist. Washington Post has posted on May 24, 2015 that the FBI confirms that no major terrorism cases were caught form the Patriot phone data collection (Krieger, 2015)
American Security Post 9/11 After going through the immeasurable shock and horror of the 9/11 attacks, Americans have joined together to create a more secure nation than existed previously. “Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. These acts shattered steel, but they cannot dent the steel of American resolve”, these inspiring words from President George W. Bush after the 2001 terrorist attacks (Bush “Address”). Immediately following these attacks the American government was working towards creating a more secure nation. After the terrorist attack on September 11th, the United States responded by creating the Department of Homeland Security.
To begin with, the Declaration was written to rally the colonists against Britain because they did not want much opposition against the war they wanted to start. At the time, the colonies were divided into three groups: Patriots, who supported the Revolution, Loyalists, who supported Britain’s rule, and the undecided. The majority of the population were either Loyalists or did not choose a side. In order for the Revolution to happen, the Patriots needed a way to convince the others to join their side, and the Declaration was perfect. According to Howard Zinn, “Everything the Declaration of Independence was about… was well-suited to unite large numbers of colonists and persuade even those who had grievances against one another to turn against England.”
Is Snowden an enemy for informing the world of how the US keeps tags on them, or is he a hero for letting the American people know that their 4th amendment is being violated? Some can argue that America’s enemies didn’t need Snowden to inform them, groups such as al-Qaeda have long since figured that out. Because it is almost certain that enemies already know about what Snowden revealed, the only thing he did wrong was violate his oath, and the NSA’s oath of secrecy trumps his belief that the NSA’s activities were an unconstitutional threat to the American people. Even though the NSA’s oath trumps Snowden’s beliefs, it does not mean that what the oath is protecting is constitutional. The National Security Agency has been keeping many people out of the dark for years about their policies.
September 11, 2001, was a defining moment in history and showed the lack of organization and structure of the government. New government organizations were created to protect the country from terrorist attacks. As a result, society adapted to these new changes. Overall, this