The nation-state, a fairly recent invention, came into being in the early nineteenth century and over the course of two centuries, has been in constant decline, mainly due to globalization. Today, national homogeneity within a state is becoming a great rarity. Currently, of 193 independent states recognized in the contemporary world, over 170 are multinational (Flint and Taylor, 2007). Striking a balance between supporting the national majority in any society while simultaneously protecting any national minorities continues to be a significant challenge facing almost all states. The phenomenon that issues relating to the interests of a single person belonging to a national minority has become a focal point for discussion in society comes as …show more content…
If states do not adequately protect the interests of their national minorities, they would create or increase intergroup hostility and consequently, a desire for independence leading to ultimate secession by minorities. History demonstrates that a biased towards majority group leads to increasing internal tensions, evolving into violent conflicts. Quebec (Zhang, 2017) is one such example. Anglophones’ social and historical status dominant group in Canada granted it an inherently superior socio-political status to that of French-speaking Quebecers – one with which French-speaking Quebecers cannot compete. Thus a Quebecer tended to be excluded from the power and decision-making centers of Canada (Zhang, 2017), affecting their equal participation in Canada’s future as whole. This contributed to the two provincial referendums on Quebec independence were held in 1980 and 1995. The foregoing consideration shows that the interests of minority groups should be recognized and protected to avoid the threat to national peace, security and the ultimate integrity of a …show more content…
The case of Canada has shown that the protection of the interests of its national minorities of course benefits both dominant majority and minority groups. By far, the most important point is if national minority interests are neglected, this could no doubt provoke political instability. The focus on incorporating national minority interests stems not merely from a desire to create a peaceful and stable political environment. The contribution made by national minorities to cultural diversity and multiplicity of society require active protection. Though opinions could be more controversial for the case of social cohesion, in general the protection of the interests of national minorities achieves harmony rather than incites distrust. Overall, the interests of national minorities should be adequately
INTRO While invoking a somewhat contentious relationship with the Federal and Quebec government, Quebec nationalism has shaped the dynamics of Canadian politics. Through a discussion of several historical events, Canadian politics have been influenced by Quebec nationalism. In this paper, I will argue how various significant changes to the constitution, the restructure of the Federal government from centralized to decentralized, and influencing policies that ultimately made Quebec a distinct society in Quebec. TOPIC 1 Since Canada is a federal state, the constitution assigns separate jurisdictions to the Federal Government and to the 10 provinces. These provincial governments have constitutionally recognized authority to enact laws in their
Quebecois “Distinct Nation” by Theresa Klein Throughout history many nations that have a powerful, shared sense of identity, but never acquired their own state or sovereign entity. I chose to write a profile of the Quebecois in Canada as a testimony to what type of national conflicts can arise in regards to the quest for independence. I visited Quebec, Canada in 1984, and at the time, as it now, a very peaceful place. Firstly, Quebecois is another word for the French-speaking natives of the Canadian province of Quebec, Canada.
The province of Quebec had wanted to separate from Canada for a decent amount of time. The thoughts of separation came in the late 1950’s and 1960’s, but was in full effect in the late 1960’s to the 1970’s, mostly due to the creation of the Parti Quebecois, created in 1968. It had become popular due to the party’s leader being René Lévesque, who was not only popular but influential too. In Canada, their urge to separate grew larger, for there were two moments in time, where they wanted to separate. In order for the province to separate, they had to have a referendum.
Often a struggle between Quebec's liberals and nationalists who want a sovereign Quebec- led to a dynamic and interesting political culture in Quebec. Though a battle of Federalists and Nationalists was prevalent in much of Quebec, ignoring other factors identity politics does not explain its culture adequately. However, given that Nationalism played an important role in forming the political culture of Quebec- the factors leading to this tide of nationalism must be examined. Political tension rose to an all-time high, with the assassination of a minister in 1970 by nationalist terrorists, we will examine how the political elites created and exacerbated this tension (Heintzmen, 1983). Nationalism was a prevalent ideology, as the populist Bloc Quebecois gained significant traction by promoting the idea of independent identity from the rest of Canada (Heintzmen, 1983).
Perhaps the most unsettle period in Canadian political history, the Quebec Referendum of 1980 and a vote to the remain part of Canada, led Ottawa to initiate a balancing program to promote Charter Rights, while protecting Quebec’s language and culture. The Meech Lake and the Charlottetown Accord were developed to address this situation. However, through a compare and contrast it can be deduced that the Charlottetown Accord provided the best balance for Charter Rights and Quebec’s need for a distinct society clause. During the 1960’s Quebec began to argue that it was a distinct society due to their language, culture and history.
Historically, Quebec nationalism has had a deep impact on Canadian politics, in relation to issues such as language rights and constitutional reforms. This paper will focus on Quebec’s nationalism influences on Canadian Politics, specifically the extent to which the 1980 referendum influenced Canadian Politics. In the 1960s, the rise of a new nationalism in Quebec forced the federal political elites to re-examine the relationship between Quebec and the rest of the country. (MISCONCEIVING CANADA, PAGE XIV) This era marked change for Quebecers across the province in terms of social and political restructuring. For many years Quebec was dominated by a conservative government which had close ties to the catholic church, up until 1960 when the
The text mentions ethnic conflict and rebellion taking place within Quebec and explains the solution for this brought up by Lord Durham within his famed Durham Report. It then mentions the passing of Lord Durham’s proposal, and questions if its passing was a good thing or not. The essay proceeds
Quebec’s secession from Canada has been driven by many factors such as the provinces’s belief in a distinct identity, lack of representation in politics and the isolation of Quebec’s culture and language from the rest of Canada. These beliefs are valid but, realistically a secession from Canada will cause economic destruction within the province. It has been reported that the province of Quebec has little economic backing in trade to finance a legitimate government in international politics. Also, issues concerning international trade and negotiations will become difficult to deal with as economic stability will not be immediately guaranteed. In addition to that, all the chaos from these problems will inevitably lead to Quebec’s citizens
For example, when the Parti Québécois leader René Lévesque proposed a sovereignty-association with Canada, which would enable Quebec to have political independence however they would have close economic ties with Canada in 1980, a separation seemed possible (Archibald, 2016). The referendum for a consensus on the sovereignty-association, held in May of 1980, resulted in a 60 percent rejection and thus the sovereignty-association between Quebec and Canada was not carried out (Hudon, 2013). Although the sovereignty-association referendum had ultimately failed, the Parti Québécois were re-elected in 1981, indicating that separatism itself had not yet died in the province and thus, the threat of Quebec’s independence was still very present (Stein, 2006). Quebec also isolated themselves from Canada when they had disagreed with the patriated and new Constitution in 1981, as their government felt that they were still not equal in comparison to the other provinces (Gall, 2006). All things considered, Quebec’s possible freedom from Canada became a real possibility in the 1980s and the threat of separatism was a key factor in the change of Quebec
Within Richard Sigurdson’s article titled Left and Right-Wing Charterphobia in Canada, he criticizes the opinions of left and right-winged individual’s opinions on the effects that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has on the country. These criticisms and scepticism about the Charter are referred to as “charterphobia” and are looked at from the point of view of liberals and conservatives. The way in which the author approaches the subject of Canada’s charter is in a critical way through the analysis of these criticisms on the left and right wing charterphobia. Not only does the author approach the topic from a critical way but by referencing specific cases in history, he is able to look at the subject historically. It is discussed
Quebec is a province in Canada that was founded in 1867. The nationalist movement in Quebec, also known as the Quebec sovereignty movement, is a political movement that promotes the independence of the province from the country of Canada. This conflict was between the Catholic people of Quebec, also known as Québécois, and the Protestant people of the rest of Canada. It is often referred to as The Quiet Revolution because no violence takes place. The reasons behind sovereignty were due to Quebec’s fear of losing their unique culture because of the assimilation of the rest of the country.
In class, we have briefly discussed Western alienation from being poorly represented in a Senate that is heavily loaded with Ontario and Quebec interests. Pierre Trudeau had a vision that all of Canada would be united as one and that no matter what province you are from, you are Canadian, and you will receive the best quality of life. If only it were that simple, The West has been taken for granted and as a Senate reform option, there should be more representation from Western provinces. In fact, there is a reform called the "Triple E-Senate", which would "provide better representation for Canadians who lived outside of Ontario, Quebec and the Atlantic provinces, and provide a check on the extraordinary powers that our system confers on majority governments" (Kline 1) " Triple E" stands for "Elected, Effective and Equal" (Gibson 17)
In many countries, conflict between different groups of people is inevitable. In Canada, the divide between English-speaking and French-speaking regions has been a prominent political and cultural topic since the birth of the nation. The most well known of these conflicts goes to Quebec. The province has sprouted several movements and parties supporting the autonomy and independence of Quebec. One of those parties is the Bloc Quebecois.
316). Rocher draws upon the same historical timeline as Trudeau when he alludes to the period of modernization in Quebec after WWII, however he focuses on the distribution of autonomy and responsibility to provinces for managing their own institutions separate from the central government (p. 316). The transfer of health care, education, social services, and economic development was representative of the pragmatism of the constitution and the sharing of jurisdictions between regional and central governments (p. 316). Although there is no mention of the role of nationalism by Rocher, he thoroughly mentions the role the central government plays in ensuring national unity, he describes the position of the federal government as “having to consult, coordinate and, inevitably, compromise in the face of mounting federal-provincial conflict”, this is connected to the discussion of compromise between the central and regional governments described by Trudeau (p.
Research Paper On Democracy in Canada Name : Harpreet Kaur Introduction The word democracy describes a Political System of any country. Dramatic changes have taken place in recent Years at the national level with respect to the day today functioning of our constitutional democracy. In a Democratic country like Canada , America all the citizens that are eligible have the rights to participate directly or indirectly in decision making that affect them.