Anyone can read a history textbook assigned in class and understand the events in their minds, but understanding the emotion of the people who were there at the events are lost in blank monotone text. Being able to recite events dryly from your textbook is not knowing one’s history. In order to fully understand history, you have to be able to understand every aspect of the events. Every emotion, thought, and desire of the people who were there as the history was made. In order to tell history, you need to attach emotion to the words being expressed so that the reader can fully understand what happened. In this context, with the help of Dr. Herbert T. Hoover, Joseph Cash gathered fifty-eight oral stories from Native Americans who had faced oppression …show more content…
The 1930s were the turning point of Native American life. Due to segregation against Native Americans and other non-white ethnic groups, unemployment for native americans was already very high, but as the stock market crashed and as many jobs instantly disappeared, the work opportunities for the Natives Americans were utterly eradicated. Unemployment rates for the Natives rose so high that most were left jobless and stranded in poverty. Reservations, most already in horrible conditions, began to deteriorate to even lower levels. The crisis for the United States was arguably even more devastating on the other ethnic groups. As things continued to get worst, the government and Natives tried to help stabilize the Native American society and stop the attacks on their Native culture. So in 1934, as a part of President’s Roosevelt’s New Deal, the united states signed the Indian Reorganization Act. The act gave tribes the option of establishing democratic forms of government. By following the modeled government described in the Act, tribes would be eligible for federal funds to purchase land, start business ventures, and receive various social services. But this all came at a hidden price that was unseen as the act was created. In his interview, Ramon Roubideaux said that, “The Indian Reorganization Act is possibly one of the best intentioned but unfortunate happenings that could have possibly taken place as far as the Indian people are concerned”(Cash and Hoover 188). This can turned out to be more obvious as , though the Act was rather effective in the beginning, as the decrease of native land slowed rapidly and the tribes were given a steady income source, the power of the Act turned to be a double edged sword. As the IRA set up democratic governments in the many of the tribes, it ironically had
Congress passed the Dawes Allotment Act in 1887, its purpose was to teach the Natives the farming methods and the American values of individualism as well as private property rather than collectively owned land in order to assimilate the Natives. This act is seen as the most assimilative and ruined tribal functions culturally and economically with the entire allotment process (O’Brien 77). The act divided reservation lands amongst individual people and families in order for them to farm and raise livestock. Each head of a household would obtain about 160 acres and individuals who were over the age of eighteen would get 80 acres, while all others would receive 40 acres of land, but any surplus land would go to settlers.
Hello Tamara Thank you for the insight on the federal Indian termination policies durning the 1950’s,and our selfish acts in attempting to move Indians off reservations and into subruban areas, I feel that justice could never be made for the todays native americans simply because the suffering we put their ansestors through could never take away the tears or pain we inflicted on them ,even though our federal government had even initiated a policy of removal as well as termination of the native americans under this particular policy that was souly created so the Native American people would no longer be government wards on reservations which todays era they are entiltled for the most psrt “subject to the same laws and entitled to the same privileges
He considered the Indian culture as a natural practice of noble virtues of humanity which should be preserved and protected from western influence. The Indian Reorganization Act was passed in order to correct the mistakes made by the Dawes General Allotment Act, with new policies such as Federal scholarships
Native Americans have been struggling to get rights they deserve but, this Indians Reorganization Act is a great step in the right direction, but like majority of policies, there are flaws and mistakes that need to be revised and fixed. So that this Indians Reorganization Act is one hundred percent beneficial for the Native Americans and they are getting the rights they completely deserve and not only half of what they Government thinks they
In a time of great economic insecurity, the implementation of the Wheeler Howard Act of 1935, apart of what is called the Indian New Deal, transformed government policy toward Native Americans. Beyond economic reform, the Indian New Deal positively resulted in the expansion of freedoms and rights of Native Americans. Journalist Frank H. Hill documented the impact of the Indian New Deal among Indians, particularly the Navajo, in A New Pattern of Life for the Indian. Through the account, Hill mentions several aspects of the Indian New Deal which proved beneficial to the Native American community. However, it should be noted that there were some apparent flaws.
Another 80 acres would go to each unmarried recipients. It was stipulated that the land could not be alienated for 25 years. Any Indian that received land automatically became citizens of the U.S. They were obligated to state, federal and local laws. All of the supporters of this act
these were years of Native American change. Though the legislature was goal was to drive tribes onto reservations and let them make sense of another lifestyle all alone, numerous Native Americans were not in agreeance. They organized into associations and rights groups and worked together toward one main goals, which was to convince the government to pass enactment that would ensure and help Native Americans Assimilate. By the year 1871, through many efforts on boths side it was clear that sending tribes to live on reservations was not a successful solution to the government 's dilemma.
As I type this post, three books I ordered have come in with some disappointment on my part. As I look at Chris McNab’s book Native American Warriors 1500-1890 CE, I recognize a book that I will be donating. Finding appropriate source material is a priority, though I goofed with this, there is sufficient material for a topic such as mine. My goal is to gather primary and secondary source material. To prepare a strong argument, I need some primary source material for the foundation of the argument.
The harsh conditions the Indians underwent “encouraged the emigration of rural laborers from Mexico to the southwestern part of the United States” (New York: American Geographical Society, 1923). Diaz intervention in the administration of justice sided with the indians (162). He was aware that a large majority of territory was taken from the indians and so, made negotiations with corrupt companies which profited off of these lands. Part of this plan was to give the Indians sale on easy payment terms, irrigation, and education (Eder, 35). Indians were part of the rural population, they had their land taken from them and therefore were repressed.
It also took away the tribal ownership of most tribes. The act moved Indian families onto their own land, and took away Indian children away from their families and sent them to boarding
The changes that were seen after the act was put into law included the end of the communal holding of property by the Native Americans. They would fractionated into individual plots of property, which caused more than half of their lands to be sold off. Women were not given any land under this act, and had to be married to receive the full 160 acres offered. While the Act was supposed to help the Indians, many resisted the changes that came with individual property ownership. They thought that becoming ranchers and farmers was distasteful.
In Collier 's view, allotment was destroying the Indians communal way of life ' ' (Takaki 225). Collier proposed the Abolition of allotment and the establishment of the Indians self-government and the preservation of the ' 'Indian civilization ' ' that includes their arts, crafts, and traditions. The ' 'New Deal ' ' was not a good deal because some Indians liked the ideal but some did not. A lot of the tribes voted to accept Reorganization Act and The Navajos turned out the deal.
This policy was meant to decrease the federal government’s involvement and financial responsibility for Indians in hopes that they would be more welcomed into modern American society (Lavin, 73). Therefore, the federal government established the Indian Claims Commission (ICC) in 1946 (Lavin, 73). The ICC created a federal court specifically designed to give the tribes an opportunity to sue the government for damages or lost land (Lavin, 73). This policy proved to be a success as the Navajos were able to elect chairmen and make much needed improvements in their communities (Lavin,
Due to the westward expansion natives were taken from their and pushed to reservation around 1849. Native tried to fight back. The government by either using forces or speaking politically. The government sold Native American land for profit. The westward expansion decreases the Native American population while the settlers benefit by it from land and gold.
Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.