70,000-100,000 Indians were already settled in the New England area in 1600. By 1700 New England contained only 93,000 Europeans inhabitants. The European and the Indians had different ideals on life and different opinions on how they should use New England’s land. The Europeans lived a life that was very reliant on settled agriculture while the Indians lived off the resources the land provided to them. Europeans were motivated by capitalism. Money and taking care of themselves were their only focuses. On the other hand, the Indians were focused on joint living. They believed everything belonged to everyone. The overall tribe as a whole was their main concern, not themselves. Cronon, “Many European visitors were struck by what seemed to them …show more content…
To the Indians, people owned what they made with themselves, including living areas, crops, and fishing spots. The Europeans were either given their land by the Queen, or they bought it from the original owners. European settlers wanted more agriculture on the land of New England. The Europeans used domesticated animals, such as cattle, hogs, and sheep to assist in planting and cultivating the crops. Colonists released the animals into the wild so they could grow and reproduce. This bothered Indians and some colonists. The animals, mostly hogs, destroyed fields and served as prey to the increasing wolf population. The cattle and sheep made the pastures flat and hard similar to the pastures in Europe. The livestock also made the soil more compact causing the soil to carry less water, making the land a less inhabitable environment for plants. This resulted in the Native Americans losing their crops. They also eventually had to start raising livestock and doing other European agricultural practices because, “Hunting too became difficult. Adjacent colonial settlements eventually tried to restrict Indian hunting on English land, and such key food sources as deer became hard to obtain.” (Cronon 103). When the Europeans noticed the Native Americans starting to lack the resources that they relied on, they took advantage of it. Cronon explains that the English traded the Indians resources for …show more content…
But, according to Cronon, there are many causes to the deforestation of New England other than the Europeans. Nature, and Indians before the colonists, definitely had an effect on the change of forests in New England. However, a lot of deforestation would most likely not have happened if the Europeans never showed. Cronon stated, “Even more than furs, whose acquisition required an exchange of trade goods with their Indian hunters, timber was free for the taking” (Cronon 109). The English took whatever they wanted from the Native Americans and the land and made a profit off of it. Cronon explains a lumbering technique called griddling that the Colonists used on the trees, causing faster deforestation. The Europeans demolished large strips of forest for crops and pastures. Eventually the damage lead to more unpredictable weather, and the drying or flooding of rivers. Swamps developed in what were once dry areas, promoting disease in those parts of New England. “The ecological effects of this regional deforestation were profound, extending even to the climate itself” (Cronon
“Changes in the Land: Indians, Colonists and the Ecology of New England” was published in 1983 by historian William Cronon. The book focuses on environmentalism and history of New England. Cronon describes the shift from Indian to European dominance, the European’s view of nature through an economic lens, and the anthropogenic changes to the environment that occured. Throughout the book, Cronon argues that the European colonists used various tactics to assert dominance over the Indians.
This was a result from poor animal and plant domestication as well as geographic barriers that the American people had to undergo. When food production became very popular, people were mostly relying on the crops that were being made. However, they struggled greatly from the many obstacles that were thrown their way. Lacking animal power, people had to perform agricultural tasks such as threshing, grinding, and irrigation by human
Native Americans who emigrated from Europe perceived the Indians as a friendly society with whom they dwelt with in harmony. While Native Americans were largely intensive agriculturalists and entrepreneurial in nature, the Indians were hunters and gatherers who earned a livelihood predominantly as nomads. By the 19th century, irrefutable territories i.e. the areas around River Mississippi were under exclusive occupation by the Indians. At the time, different Indian tribes such as the Chickasaws, Creeks, and Cherokees had adapted a sedentary lifestyle and practiced small-scale agriculture. According to the proponents of removal, the Indians were to move westwards into forested lands in order to generate additional space for development through agricultural production (Memorial of the Cherokee Indians).
1. How are the Puritans going to justify the taking of Native American land? The puritans defended taking the local land by trusting it was the correct thing ", the pagan for thine legacy, and the farthest parts of the earth for thy ownership. " And to legitimize their utilization of power to take the land, they referred to Romans 13:2: "Whosoever therefore resister the power, resister the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. "
The people of England faced many battles upon settling in the New World. Food became limited, as their supplies began to run out over time. Many people became ill and malnourished, which lead to mass fatalities among the settling colonies. Without the benefit of summer-time heat, and a lengthy winter season, it was almost impossible for New England to grow crops or make any money off of their land. The harsh environment for agriculture lead to a trade of products to help them survive.
They used these animals to transport goods and silver the mines, they ate their meat and used their wool for making blankets.” These examples are the evidences that show that Europeans were able to take the leadership to change the society in various ways to bring changes in the new world. They treated people to enhance success in the country setting and these are the reasons why they are
Europeans also introduced horses, cows and pigs. In turn the Native Americans gifted the Old World with gold, silver, corn, potatoes, tobacco, tomatoes, beans, vanilla and chocolate. The amount of silver in Europe tripled from the introduction of
The development of agriculture and the rise of industrialization generated new cultures and innovations in the new world. Native people in early America developed cultural distinct , men were in charge of the fishing, hunting, jobs that were more exposed to violence, and the women stayed closed to the village, farming, and child bearing. The way of life possessed by natives Americans did not compel them to conquer and transform new land. As opposed to European colonizers, Native Americans subscribed to a more “animistic” understanding of nature. In which they believed that plants and animals are not commodities, they are something to be respected rather than used.
Starting in the early 1600’s settlers from England came to “The New World.” England and Spain were competing to claim this new undiscovered land. The English were the first to claim the land by sending the first group of settlers, the Chesapeake settlers. They settled in present day Virginia and Maryland. The Chesapeake settlers came for commercial and profit.
When the Europeans began colonizing the New World, they had a problematic relationship with the Native Americans. The Europeans sought to control a land that the Natives inhabited all their lives. They came and decided to take whatever they wanted regardless of how it affected the Native Americans. They legislated several laws, such as the Indian Removal Act, to establish their authority. The Indian Removal Act had a negative impact on the Native Americans because they were driven away from their ancestral homes, forced to adopt a different lifestyle, and their journey westwards caused the deaths of many Native Americans.
First of all, Native Americans were settled on a hotbed of natural resources which included oil and precious metals such as silver and gold. There was also much fertile land that would entice farmers and frontiersmen to move out west. On this land there was so much potential economic opportunity for farmers, cattle drivers, miners and many other occupations. The government developed the popular public misconception that the indians were misusing the land and that Americans had the right to take advantage of the opportunities that lie in the west. These ideas led to the Dawes Severalty Act of 1887 which authorized encroachment of Indian lands by the US government in order to divide up reservations and control Indian activity.
The Columbian Exchange between the new world and the old world significantly change people’s lives. After 1492, Europeans brought in horses to America which changes the nomadic Native American groups’ living from riding on buffalos to horses. This interchange also change the diet of the rest of the world with foods such as corns (maize), potatoes which are major diet for European nowadays. Besides all the animals from old world to the new world, Spanish also brought in the diseases that Native Americans were not immune of, such as smallpox which led to a large amount of Native Americans’ deaths.
The New World was home to Native Americans before it was ever home to Europeans. Europeans, mostly the English were who began to shape it to their needs and personal identities. New England, for example was considered to be tight knit and as a result of having families developed schools, and churches to fit their lifestyle. New England and Chesapeake were distinct societies during the colonization era of North America with different settlement patterns, motivations, and economies. Patterns of settlement for New England and Chesapeake differed greatly.
They readily exchanged the domestication of insects, animals, and plants. For example, the Indians were not familiar with the European animals such as pigs, horses, and cows while the Settlers acquired vegetables and different fruits from the Native land. These healthy exchanges caused the future agricultural developments in both worlds (Moran, Neil Remington, and Sarah). The Indians made good use of the opportunity. After getting animals like horses, it enables them to explore other lands of America.
By 1900, Native Americans had lost half of the land that had been originally given to them. Meanwhile, the farming and assimilating of Native Americans was not successful. By many accounts, Indians were not adjusting to neither their new family dynamic nor farming. The Cheyennes had to learn how to plough, plant, and harvest their new aired properties. One Sioux recalled the struggle men especially had of being stripped of his previous purpose, hunting buffalo, and his tribe, with whom he hunted with.