Nature Vs Nurture Controversy

What is the Nature vs. Nurture Controversy? The controversy that has been debated for many years is whether or not development is primarily influenced by nature or by nurture (Stantrock, 2013). Nature refers to the biological inheritance or an organism, while nurture is how the human responds to their individual environmental experiences. There is no doubt that both are contributing factors to human life development. The nature side of the historic dispute says that we all come from somewhere, and that somewhere is the gene. On the other side Nurture, says that we are who we are today because of our experiences and interactions that have been built over many years. We may inherit blueprints, but all else follows from the interactions of the individual 's genetic code with her/his environment (French, 2003). Identical twins illustrate how nature and nurture work together to develop further. A study has

With his focus being sexual in nature, that will be his residing side. Freud claims as adults we resolve conflicts between sources of pleasure at each individual stage and the demands of realty (Santrock, 2013). Freud’s Theory had been revised by many psychoanalytic theorists, but they portrayed that he overemphasized sexual instinct. One of his most influential critics or revisionist is Erik Erikson.

Theory influenced by Nurture I will argue that, while nature may provide some parameters, it is what we do within and around those parameters that makes a real difference to learners (French, 2003). Erikson’s Theory states that at each stage a unique developmental task confronts individuals with a crisis that must be resolved. He disagrees with Freud in the sense that there are psychosocial stages, rather than psychosexual. The more successful they are resolving the crisis the healthier the development will be (Santrock,