Can a child’s behavior be predicted based on the parents’ past experiences? I think children’s behavior is affected by both nature and nurture. I believe that children are born with a lot of their parents’ traits but they also develop the traits of the people around you when you are growing up. In the article “Nature vs. Nurture in Psychology” It explains that “certain characteristics are biologically determined by genetic inheritance.” They are talking about how your parents’ features/traits are passed down to you at birth like eye color, hair color, skin pigment, and certain diseases. If those things can be passed down from your parents’ then the behavior can be like your parents too.
Albert Bandura had a theory that if children were exposed to violent or aggressive behavior they would see it and behave aggressively as well. Bandura created an experiment called the Bobo Doll Experiment. He demonstrated this experiment and the children that were exposed to the aggressive behavior showed aggressive behavior towards the Bobo doll. This famous experiment proves that nurture also plays a big role in your behavior. Sometimes children might pick up traits from a role model of theirs which is also an example of nurture. If your parents raise you into violence you are most likely going to end up being a violent person.
…show more content…
This makes it possible to predict the child 's behavior because they can base the behavior of those who grew up with them. I also believe that children are born with many of their own traits. A lot of kids can learn from their parents’ mistakes and make their own life better because of it. Children can suffer from their parents behavior and they will know to not be like them and work extra hard to be better. With all of this put together I think that it is possible to predict a child’s behavior based on their parents’ past experiences but it is not
In Chapter 19 of The Blank Slate, Steven Pinker discusses children which is one of his hot button topics. Pinker opens with a discussion on the nature-nurture debate - a debate pinning biology and environment against each other. Pinker states that Eric Turkheimer declares the debate to be over because he did a study that was completed over and over again, refined, and yielded the same results time and time again. Thus, creating the three laws of behavioral genetics.
According to Bandura 's social learning theory, people are not born with the ability to act violently, however, it is learned through the "process of behavior modeling and observation" through several outlets such as family interactions or mass media. There 's a strong correlation between an early childhood aggression and an adolescent aggression. Osibin could possibly have been exposed to violence as a child and have a strained relationship with her mother growing up. Alicia Osibin may have suffered from poor role models which "produces imitation and instigation of socially undesirable behaviors," such as violent acts. Furthermore, the psychodynamic theory proposed that "criminals are frustrated and aggravated" due to negative events in their childhood which affect the individual 's unconscious.
Influence from your parents affects personality and motivation. The amount of pressure put on children can affect an individual's motivation to succeed. In outliers, Gladwell says “But social savvy is knowledge. Its a set of skills that have to be learned. It has to come from somewhere, and the place where we seem to get these kidneys of attitudes and skills is from our families”(Gladwell 102).
Aside from school, parents are also a huge influence on determining who their child is. However, as Edmundson states, “you may not be the person your parents take you to be- and this thought more exciting and dangerous- you may not be the person you take yourself to be, either.” This is the case for many people. Many individuals are raised a certain way and since they can remember were told they were going to be a doctor, or a dentist, or will go to business school.
Nature and Nurture Influence on Aggression One psychology debate that remains in today's world is the argument between nature and nurture. Scientists who study behaviors, like psychologists or sociologists, are always arguing about the topic of nature and nurture. Whether nature or nurture plays a more significant role in terms of forming us. Our personality is influenced by many factors in our life, such as the environment or the inherited genes. Some people believe that genes play a bigger part in the formation of our mental traits, such as personality.
A major debate in the field of child cognitive development is whether certain aspects of development are learned or innate. It is a continuation of the classic dispute between the nature vs nurture elements of development. The chapter and articles delve into this debate with visual and auditory perception in children and provides empirical evidence towards whether or not infants are born with the ability to detect and distinguish these perceptions. There is a large consensus that perceptual functioning in children reaches adult like levels fairly quickly during the first year of development Siegler (2005).
One of the most debated topics throughout the world is nature versus nurture. When psychologists debate this topic, they are studying what influences a person’s personal development. Some say that a person’s nature influences personal development while others say a person’s nurture influences personal development. A lot of people spend time contemplating which one actually does the influencing but what some do not realize is that, perhaps, both nature and nurture help shape a person’s personal development. One topic that comes up quite often is whether or not a person is born a criminal.
Temperament is relatively stable at birth, but during preschool years the goodness-of-fit between the child’s temperament and the parenting style could produce favorable outcomes (Berk, 2009). For example, parents with a goodness-of-fit could respond to their child in a sensitive manner if they are frustrated or angry (Berk, 2009). Temperament has many other influences other than it being genetically, and Dr. Rettew highlights most of these
Aggression is a spoken or physical behavior that causes intentional harm to a person. There are many different theories that argue what the cause of aggression is but this can be divided into two major types: people who think that aggression is inborn and those that view it as a learning behavior. The Social cognitive theory states that we learn behaviors through observation and modeling and this could be implied that we learn aggressive behaviors through observing and imitating others. The Social Cognitive theory claims that people learn behaviors from observation, modeling, and motivation such as positive reinforcement. Psychologists mention that people learn behaviors by imitating models through observational learning; as well as through
Social learning theory states that an individual will model behaviors that one has been exposed to as a child (Chibucos, Leite, & Weis, 2005). As a child, it is through observation and imitating other people that we learn our behaviors and what is acceptable or normal behaviors. Violence is said to be a learned behavior which can be learned directly or indirectly through family members, friends, partners, etc. These learned behaviors are reinforced in childhood and can continue into adulthood through a term called operant conditioning. Bandura (1973) mentions that these behaviors that continue into adulthood typically act as a coping response to stress or as a method of conflict resolution.
If a child 's parents are bad influences, then the child is more than likely going to become a bad person, because it is easier than developing a whole new identity for themselves. However, the child can choose to turn their life around and be seen as a good person, because they do not want to be seen as to have the same identity as their parents. The same can go with very good parents that have good influences, because sometimes it is easier not to do the right thing and have a bad identity. Today, you can have a variety of different parents, a father and a mother are most common, however you may also have two fathers, two mothers, only one parent, or even a mother, father, and step parents.
Nurture is the Key to Human Developments Nurture is the entirety of environment influenced aspects which impact the growth and actions of an individual. Socrates believed that nurture plays a large role in the development of the individual because it can help gain self understanding, decide the way people view the world, and affect people’s nature. By learning knowledge from the world, people are able to identify themselves by understanding things like thoughts, actions, and emotions. For instance: through interactions with others, people can learn what a positive person is like. They have smiles on their faces all the time and won’t easily be affected by bad news.
Use at least two scholarly articles as well as the textbook to support your position. There are facts to prove that both nature and nurture take a huge role in how children develop and why they become what they are as adults. Based on the research it is known that there is no clear answer as to what is more influential than the other when it comes to nature versus nurture. This topic is still in debate due to the fact that there are so many supporting details to prove that both play a huge role in a child’s life. REFERENCES: : Nature versus nurture debate.
Parents influence their children because children affect the behaviour of their parents and seek the child’s view with morality. It’s means that children’s personalities are forms by their parents. Over 97 percent of serial killers had an abominable family and upbringing. You are bringing usually affects the way you behave and your personality traits. Ted Bundy, Charles Manson, David Bartkiewicz are all renowned for being no Toria’s killers.
They will follow or intimate the action or behavior that display by the adult. Number of 36 boys and 36 girls with an age ranged from 37 to 69 months were tested. He showed a video to children in which an adult beat up on a doll and divided the children into three groups, and each group watched a video with a different ending. The result shows that the children who saw the aggressive model made more aggressive acts than the children who