Nature Vs. Nurture In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
Mary Shelley’s 1818 Frankenstein retroactively follows a young scientist who succeeds in creating life only to abandoned his creature, consequently begetting misery on all parties involved. Throughout the novel, the question arises if the monstrosity that surfaces in Frankenstein’s creature is a product of his natural condition or environmental factors. The debate between nature vs. nurture centers on the argument on whether it is nature, one’s natural predisposition, which generates attributes and personality, or nurture, the experiences of a person. In this essay I endeavor to establish that the argument of nature vs. nurture is both proven and disproven as the Creature’s inherent nature is overcome and embittered by the cruelties he suffers whereas Frankenstein’s picturesque upbringing does not prevent his flawed nature to generate suffering in the hopes of understanding what makes a monster and what makes a man. From even before the creature’s animation, it would appear that his nature would have him destined for solitude, if not tragedy. Formed from an unorthodox assortment of pieces from the “dissecting-room and the slaughter-house” (Shelley 34), the creature is already an “other”. Despite an abhorrent appearance, when the creature first awakens he is the epitome of a “blank slate”, as he knows nothing, except through what he experiences. Having no understanding of Victor’s initial rejection of him, the Creature, reaches for Victor, just as a newborn searches for the
Examples Of Nature Vs Nurture In Frankenstein
1405 Words | 6 PagesNature Versus Nurture: The Evolution of Frankenstein’s Monster It is natural for a human or other animal to evolve and adapt to the environment around themself, both physically and socially. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the creature evolves in a similar manner, and almost reaches a human state by doing so, despite not being human. These adaptations are mainly caused by the social rejections he faces and the isolation through which he has to suffer, as he is neglected by his creator as well as everyone around him.
An Analysis Of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: From Benevolent To Feind
1246 Words | 5 PagesFrankenstein: From Benevolent to Feind “I was benevolent and good; misery made me a fiend.” (Shelley 69) Said by Frankenstein’s monster, this quote truly defines him: initially an affectionate, love-seeking creature, he transformed into an enraged killer, angry at humanity for the undeservedly poor way he was treated. Victor Frankenstein is an unique, complex individual who encounters a similar change of nature for similar reasons. The quote—though spoken by the monster—encapsulates the evolution of Victor Frankenstein’s personality; misery—a product of isolation and loneliness—aroused a deterioration of temperament from an initially benevolent Frankenstein.
The Role Of Parenting In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
1617 Words | 7 PagesThe Duties a Parent Has Towards Their Children What gives humans the right to create life? Moreover, what responsibilities does a parent have to his child. Multiple philosophies have been formulated that address this question; communism and Christianity being two of the most prominent in the western modern world. In the novel Frankenstein, Mary Shelley uses Frankenstein’s monster to convey her belief that a parent's most basic duty to their child is to be present in their live while caring and nurture them. She does this through a multitude of literary devices.
Influence Of Parental Figure In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
938 Words | 4 PagesParents are everyone 's first role models. Regardless of biological relation, those who raise us have a profound influence on the way we perceive and interpret life. Parents lay the foundation of our first sense of morality and empathy, and usher us to the path of our development of social skills. No matter how consciously one may attempt to have no resemblance to their parents, it is an inevitability of life that we will harness aspects of their influence and carry them through our lifetime. In Mary Shelley’s, “Frankenstein”, the influence of parental figures is displayed by the morals and values instilled in the monster.
Social Belonging In Frankenstein
987 Words | 4 PagesThe moment Victor Frankenstein successfully infuses life into his creation he is overcome with horror and disgust. Without further examination he is certain to have created a monster, not a human being (Shelley 35-36). However, despite his grotesque appearance, Frankenstein’s creature was not born malicious. During the first stages of his existence, unbeknownst to Frankenstein himself, his acts are motivated by innocence and virtue, which even earns him the title “good spirit” (79). Frankenstein did not create a monster.
The Villain In Frankenstein
882 Words | 4 PagesOver the past century, Frankenstein has been analyzed and interpreted in seemingly infinite different forms of literature, film, and television shows. Once solely recognized as the story about a brilliant scientist who creates a creature in whom he regrets making after the creature turns out ugly, Frankenstein now represents an internationally recognized and commercialized pop culture symbol for Halloween decorations and costumes. When analyzing and appreciating the true literary essence behind Mary Shelley’s original Frankenstein, one of the most important comparisons to consider remains the underlying influences behind the Creature’s immoral actions and whether or not the blame for these actions belong to Victor or the Creature. When exploring the dichotomy of the Creature versus Victor Frankenstein, one of the biggest and most widely debated questions remains whether Victor should be blamed for the Creature’s destructive actions or if the Creature should be considered guilty for his actions based off of his own free will. Many consider Victor Frankenstein the villain of the story due to his repetitive decisions to abandon and avoid his own “mistake,” the irresponsible choice of creating the monster in the first place, and his obvious negligence of the Creature’s feelings.
Duality Of Human Nature In Frankenstein
819 Words | 4 PagesDuality is shown in Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein, a gothic tale of a scientist whom looks to advance the life-giving qualities of mother nature. Through this novel, Shelley proves that good and evil in human nature is not always simple to define, and that everyone has both of these qualities within them. The duality of human nature is shown through the characters of Victor Frankenstein and his monster, who are both heroes in the novel while simultaneously displaying anti-hero qualities. Shelley forces the reader to sympathize with them both but also creates gruesome ideas of the two. Frankenstein’s creature places himself in a submissive position when he begs his creator to have mercy on him and asking the creator to “create a female for [him] with whom [he] can live in the interchange of those sympathies necessary for [his] being.”
The Influence Of Nature Vs. Nurture In Frankenstein
825 Words | 4 PagesNature is the predetermined traits that people are born with, while nurture is the influence that affects people after they’re born. The debate surrounding Nature V. Nurture is how much of a person’s traits is predetermined and how much is influenced by the environment. Mary Shelley's believes in nurture more than nature. Victor Frankenstein has certain traits that he’s born with. Frankenstein is born into a prestigious, wealthy family.
The Influence Of Nature In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
1191 Words | 5 PagesNumerous research has concluded that several emotional bonds exist between humanity and nature that can impact everything from attitude to anxiety. Novels of the romanticism period, a significant literary era that encompassed most European works written in the early 1800’s, are most known for describing the impacts that nature has on people and implying that unexpected consequences can arise out of this relationship; Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a prime example of such a novel. The prime conflict of this 1818 science-fiction story occurs between the titular character, Victor Frankenstein, and a monster he creates through his own scientific innovations. Because of Victor’s abandonment of the monster, it becomes intent on destroying the scientist’s
The Monster's Alienation In Frankenstein
782 Words | 4 PagesIn the novel Frankenstein,by Mary Shelley, the mysterious and unnatural origins of the character of Frankenstein’s monster are an important element. The Monster, having been created unethically and haphazardly, is at odds throughout the novel, resulting in his alienation from society and prolonged feelings of anger, desertion, and loneliness. Shaping his character, his relationships with other characters, and the meaning of the work as a whole, the Monster’s origins are what define him. The Monster faces rejection and violence every time he attempts to make contact with the new, foreign world he has been thrust into.
Character Development In Frankenstein
1921 Words | 8 PagesSuch passion is seen in Victor’s ‘noble intent’ to design a being that could contribute to society, but he had overextended himself, falling under the spell of playing ‘God,’ further digging his grave as he is blinded by glory. His creation – aptly called monstrous being due to its stature, appearance, and strength – proved to be more of a pure and intellectually disposed ‘child’ that moves throughout the novel as a mere oddity, given the short end of the stick in relation to a lack of familial figures within his life, especially that of parents. Clearly, Victor Frankenstein had sealed his fate: by playing God he was losing his humanity, ultimately becoming the manifestation of Mary Shelley’s hidden desires, deteriorating into The Lucifer Principle by which the author Howard Bloom notes social groups, not individuals, as the primary “unit of selection” in human psychological
Nature And Romanticism In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
758 Words | 4 Pages(Shelly 42, 43) Here, the effects of his continued pursuit of knowledge and neglect of well-being is shown evidently. Once Frankenstein creates the monster, his unquenchable thirst for knowledge is frightened into silence. He then presently returns to the outside world,
The Importance Of Mother Nature In Shelley's Frankenstein
862 Words | 4 PagesThe Tides that Turned Mother Nature is disrupted when Victor Frankenstein attempts to “...Pioneer a new way, explore unknown powers, and unfold to the world the deepest mysteries of creation” (Shelley 28) . In the novel, Frankenstein’s interest in alchemy and natural philosophy form an irreversible desire to change natural order. Over time, we are able to see the life altering effects of altering life, and how characters who stick to nature 's path are more successful. In Shelley’s Frankenstein, a foil between Victor and Henry is developed to demonstrate that romanticism results in authentic joy, whereas altering the natural world leads to fatal repercussions.
Nature And Setting In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
764 Words | 4 PagesThe novel Frankenstein has a unique way of expressing how the setting functions as a whole. Mary Shelley used an early 1800s setting in Switzerland and London to show how Victor made it through this extraordinary adventure. There were multiple themes that affected how the setting functioned in the novel. Nature, weather, and season all affect the mood of the characters. These things all have a great impact on the setting of the book.
Role Of Nature In Frankenstein
377 Words | 2 PagesNature and Frankenstein compare in their understanding of the relationship between human beings and the natural world because the natural world is an emotional experience and the influence of nature changes the mood drastically. The natural world is an emotional experience for Victor because he got depressed about the death of Justine and William. To cope with his feelings he decided to escape to the hills. Victor struggles to cope with the deaths: The sceneries help Victor out by cheering him up and acting as a sense of relief.
More about Nature Vs. Nurture In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
Examples Of Nature Vs Nurture In Frankenstein
1405 Words | 6 PagesAn Analysis Of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein: From Benevolent To Feind
1246 Words | 5 PagesThe Role Of Parenting In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
1617 Words | 7 PagesInfluence Of Parental Figure In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
938 Words | 4 PagesSocial Belonging In Frankenstein
987 Words | 4 PagesThe Villain In Frankenstein
882 Words | 4 PagesDuality Of Human Nature In Frankenstein
819 Words | 4 PagesThe Influence Of Nature Vs. Nurture In Frankenstein
825 Words | 4 PagesThe Influence Of Nature In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
1191 Words | 5 PagesThe Monster's Alienation In Frankenstein
782 Words | 4 PagesCharacter Development In Frankenstein
1921 Words | 8 PagesNature And Romanticism In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
758 Words | 4 PagesThe Importance Of Mother Nature In Shelley's Frankenstein
862 Words | 4 PagesNature And Setting In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein
764 Words | 4 PagesRole Of Nature In Frankenstein
377 Words | 2 Pages