The nature versus nurture debate will likely continue due to the complex interaction of each with the other. However, in order to understand the development of certain behaviors throughout childhood and adolescence, examining environmental influences is imperative. While genes are similar to a code that can help predict development, they are not definitive answers, and environmental factors such as peers, parents, and society are important and influential variables. When examining the debate between nature and nurture, it is easy to say that our nature is what makes us who we are; Although if that were the case, twins who share 100 percent of their genetic makeup would be exactly the same. Every person experiences life in a completely unique and individual way, and nurture is responsible
What made me the way I am? This is a common question that stems from the idea of environmental circumstances that form our established qualities as well as an opposing idea that supports how genes and ones DNA shape individuals. This argument of nature versus nurture has become an international debate among many philosophers, psychologists and scientists. Nature is the idea that people are shaped primarily by genetic make-up, while nurture argues that our environmental influences and life experiences are the important factors in determining how the person is today Essentially, these two topics are extremely diverse and an immense amount of research is done to further explore and understand humans. Both have evidential facts to support either human nature: “the general psychological characteristics, feelings, and behavioral traits of humankind, regarded as shared by all humans” or human nurture: “care for and encourage the growth or development of” (Mate).
Introduction: In the attempt to explain human behaviour, one of the oldest debates in psychology is the issue of nature versus nurture. This debate revolves around the extent to which genetic inheritance and external environmental factors affect human behaviour. At one end there are the nativists which believe that human differences are based of genetic codes. On the other hand, there are the empiricists who believe the human mind at birth is a blank slate and is eventually “filled” by experience. The nature versus nurture debate relates to many different areas of psychology such as language acquisition, prejudice, intelligence and many other areas of study.
Nature versus Nurture is one of the oldest debates within psychology that has been going on for centuries. The debate of nature versus nurture is focused on whether the behavior of a particular individual is inherited through genes and other biological factors or it is acquired through influences of external factors such as product of exposure, conditioning and or experiences (McLeod, 2007). The Nature theory is thought of as pre-wiring whichdetermines the genetics that are inherited such as eye colour, pigmentation of skin and even certain diseases are all of the things that get inherited through birth. Other physical characteristics such as height and weight are not as strongly influenced by the genetic make-up because they are also influenced by lifestyle choices (McLeod, 2007). Advocates of nature over nurture believe that all of our characteristics and behaviours are a result of evolutions, genetic traits that are passed down from our biological parents (YourDictionary, 2016).
nurture involves whether human behavior is determined by genetics or by the environment, upbringing, and life experiences. It is a perfect example of the influences that establish a human’s social graces and personality. Handful of factors hold the ability to predict success including social, educational, and emotional skills that are affected by the way of life. Wealth is an important factor of success and survival, although some individuals belittle the significance of money, as they are not materialistic. All of these components control the capacity to succeed as lower socioeconomic classes hold less ability and higher classes hold more ability.
During this assignment, I will be discussing how a child or young person's development can be affected by their nature and their nurture. Our nature is what biological make-up we inherited from our parents, whether the pigmentation of our hair or inherited diseases. Our nurture is the upbringing we had as a child, what we were taught from our parents, right from wrong, and our morals. These key issues are important when considering a child or young person's development, as both their nature and nurture has affected and influenced their development. Within settings, the Nature Vs Nurture debate could affect the practice.
Thesis: Human development has been regarded as one of the most highly controversial topics in the world. This debate is labeled nature versus nurture. The controversy centers on the premise that our personality, behavior, intelligence, and feelings are either genetically inherited, or environmentally earned; that we are innate creatures born with our personalities, or that they are learned by experiences and time. We are born with our personalities, but our behaviors are learned through experience and shaped thru time. Barbara Latten: "I think that inherently we are who we are.
A common psychological debate is whether individuals are more controlled by nature or nurture. In this debate, some argue that nature, the inherited traits over which we have no control, impacts our lives more. Conversely, others argue that nurture, our upbringing by our family members and relatives, has a greater influence on our lives than nature. I prefer to argue that neither is more important than the other, but rather they simultaneously mold individuals into the people they become. The attributes of our environments and genetic traits we are born with are equally influential throughout a person’s lifetime.
For nearly 150 years, research scientists have studied and debated the origins of human intelligence. The phrase “Nature vs. Nurture” has become the proxy by which scientists and philosophers signal their beliefs: the “nature” argument for those who believe in hereditary origins and the “nurture” position which proposes that environmental factors can influence this human trait (“Intelligence Debate”). Modern theorists, such as Professor Eva Krapol from King’s College and Professor Regina Sullivan of New York University are major proponents of the “nature” and “nurture” position, respectively. These spokespersons continue to advocate vociferously their positions in stark, black and white terms. However, the more rational approach is less stark
This topic is one of the oldest topic in psychology, psychologist have been concerned with what determine our behaviour more either nature (genes) and nurture (environment), which helps us in understanding and predicting human and animal behaviour. What is nature? Nature could be defined as that which is inherited,