How Entertainment Conquered Reality Analysis

Ever noticed how sexist, racist and homophobic an American can be? If not, watch the Super Bowl. Before, during, and after the Super Bowl commercials that some people see as comedy, but some see these commercials very controversial, air. Coke, 84 Lumber and others have used people’s sex, race, and sexuality to sell their product or to promote their stance on a social injustice, which also helps sell their product or better their image. Sexualizing women, using Trump’s Wall for commerce, and featuring homosexuals in their commercials for publicity.

Murrow explains on how the media should be used but instead they use it to suck in people to distract people from what the government is actually

Ideology as common sense is forcing people to operate with a system of traces that they have no inventory for. His theory is that perpetuating an ideology works best when the people you are trying to control do not know what they don’t know. The people know part of the story, but they do not know the whole story. This theory of ideology explains why the ideology of toxic masculinity was able to spread so far and so deeply into our culture. The media uses the now mythic symbols of masculinity to enforce their ideologies.

This is giving people a misinterpretation of what life should be about and that's happiness, good doing, and virtuous instead he gives the image of greed, gluttony, and pride. What we must do is to stop letting people influence what we think is right and wrong and what we think we need in life versus what we actually need in life. What I've learned in class applies to this topic because it highlights the wrong doings of some celebrities like Kanye West and how he actually influences the minds of other in the world and how his wrong doing and self interest in himself can actually affect the mind of others and the lives they will want to live. To solve this, I think we need to apply the ethical position of the principle of universalizability which is "An act is morally acceptable if, and only if, its maxim is universalizability" (Garcia,16). What this means is that we need a society in which what we do can be accepted by everyone that way nobody can see anything as a way of

Due to ideological control from the chinese revolution, people are nearly brainwashed to agree with the government. Weiwei is aware of it and writes in order to rebel against his culture, debunking them of their

Burr states that Hollywood made their actors and characters is movies more realistic so that we would want to either be just like them or become better than them. In the end of Burr’s excerpt, he asks many interesting questions to the reader. Why do we go through the obsession and who are we? What kind of people we are and why do we go through so much effort to see celebrities in their works, just to go home and talk about their flaws on social media?

The issue of surveillance in George Orwell’s 1984 and modern society is inversely related, in which the novel views surveillance as a negative effect on people, while surveillance in modern society benefits the people. Also, the similarities of technological usage between both the fictional and realistic societies display the different reasons as to why surveillance is used. 1984 displays surveillance through both psychological and physical aspects affecting all citizens of the party, good or bad, while in the modern world, surveillance is used for singling out criminals, murderers, and terrorists. These opposing uses, despite the similarities in technology, have the potential to affect people positively or negatively, chosen and controlled

Eventually, if they keep consuming that product, they will want to keep having it, so they will waste more time and money on that product that they want to keep using. This will drain the sliver out of China and go back to the previous holders of it. The British would formally take advantage of their weakness and keep collecting opium to sell to China. The Mafia was similar since they abuse their extortion by making civilians think they need to pay in order to be safe and happy. They both went against their rights and pursue to just get what they wanted.

1.Society as a whole believes serial killer are evil because that is how the media portrays them. We subconsciously let the media control our thoughts by believing it what they tell us. The media knows the power they have over us when we listen to the news, watching a movie or even reading the newspaper. In the way they report news on serial killers , it promotes fear and anxiety to their viewers. Movies even have more effect than we realize as well .

so

His methods were brilliant, though. He knew he could gain support from the lower classes by claiming Berkeley was oppressing the poor. He also played on the fear of Indians, religious heresy, oppressive taxation, and disloyalty to the king, all of which would incite strong

The main idea is to help raise awareness of america in foreign countries and help them out. It can be seen as deviant because some people might take it that the volunteers working abroad are brainwashing the people they work with and talking against their cultural norms. CESARE BECCARIA‘S ON CRIMES AND PUNISHMENT- A book written by Cesare Beccaria arguing against torture and death penalty. The main idea was to call for reforming the criminal law system.

Manipulation and strategic interpretations from a large scale media would largely affect the perception of the audience of the truth, in order to gain the the ratings. Within the TV Series Frontline, it successfully communicates that one’s reputations will sway their perception regardless of the actual truth. ‘Frontline’ is a confronting TV Series which explains that the news are like narratives, which are false story that aims to entice their audience in the lies created. During the interview between Brooke and Allison, it demonstrates the moral hypocrisy that occurred so that Brooke can hide the lies from Allison. “We don 't pay for interviews, but we will give you a light to Queensland”, through the utilisation of quick cuts it stating that

“Battle Royal” by Ralph Ellison: “And all the while the blonde continued dancing, smiling faintly at the big shots who watched her with fascination, and faintly smiling at our fear. I noticed a certain merchant who followed her hungrily, his lips loose and drooling. He was a large man who wore diamond studs in a shirtfront which swelled with the ample paunch underneath, and each time the blonde swayed her undulating hips he ran his hand through the thin hair of his bald head and, with his arms upheld, his posture clumsy like that of an intoxicated panda, wound his belly in a slow and obscene grind” (4). This is a “key” passage in the larger text because the woman here is simply a metaphor for the minority’s, blacks and women, gruesome experiences

No woman is allowed to be angry. This is the message that is subliminally delivered by those who tend to accuse the anger of a woman as a played-out weapon. For far too long has the uproar of unjust accusations made by women been disregarded as an emotionally biased issue. This has caused a great many of women to restrain their tongues before speaking their true and pure opinion. They fear persecution and that their whole argument will not be taken heavily if the delivery is not well thought out and calmly delivered.