The vast power of the federal government has been on the rise, crippling the state’s authority. In the early 1800’s there have been cases where the Supreme Court has ruled, for the most part, in the federal government’s benefit. With the Legislative and Judicial Branches making up 2/3 of the federal government’s power, many could speculate the two powers are working to strengthen the federal government. However, the ruling was based off of Necessary and Proper Clause, where it is said that Congress (Legislative Branch) has the authority “to find the great powers, to lay and collect taxes; to borrow money; to regulate commerce; and to declare and conduct a war.” When the states interfere it causes the Judicial Branch to step in and decide what …show more content…
The reason Congress is given this ability is because Congress has assumed the position in order to better do its job. In many cases the Supreme Court has had to decide whether the interference of Congressional actions were constitutional, in the majority of these court cases the outcome has benefited the federal government. For instance, the case over McCulloch v. Maryland Chief Justice, John Marshall, interpreted the Necessary and Proper Clause, by conveying that the federal government (Congress) has the ability, under Necessary and Proper clause “to find the great powers, to lay and collect taxes; to borrow money; to regulate commerce; to declare and conduct a war; and to raise and support armies and navies. The sword and the purse, all the external relations, and no inconsiderable portion of the industry of the nation are entrusted to its Government.” Since the government collects taxes and borrows money, when Maryland did not comply with the U.S. National Bank they got in the way of tax collection. The McCulloch and Gibbons’ cases had an impact on regulation of …show more content…
Thomas Jefferson disagrees with the idea that Congress could broadly interpret the clause’s powers, because he believes that when the majority of Congress does, it will enable them to do whatever they want to do. And Jefferson says, “…it (Congress) would be also a power to do whatever evil they please and this can never be permitted.” Congress has had the ability to “make all laws which shall be necessary and proper” through the Necessary and Proper Clause, establishing federal power, regulating future endeavors, this has led to speculation within our government. Even with the controversy of the Necessary and Proper Clause, many would say that this clause has helped with future endeavors, such as railroads and computers. However, we see that time and time again the powers of the state our over-powered by the federal government, as we saw in the McCulloch v. Maryland case. As many founding fathers fought over what extent The Necessary and Proper Clause should be used, we find that most Anti-federalist disagreed with the clause; and the Federalist agreed for what the clause stood for. The federal government has changed over the years; gaining power from the
McCulloch v. Maryland In 1791 Congress chartered a bank in order to gain assistance for the government in financial situations. According to Thomas Jefferson this action was unconstitutional. Hamilton said that Congress can and will do all that is necessary and proper and that the use of a “bank is necessary and proper in order to collect taxes, further the nation’s welfare, conduct war, and so on.”
During the United States history, there have been events that have impacted the course and development of politics, becoming part of what is currently, and the McCulloch v. Maryland case has been one of the most influential events in the economic area. In addition, I believe that the courage that McCulloch had to refuse to pay the taxes imposed by Maryland was an elemental key part to continue with the processes of the growth of the United States National Bank and the regulation of the coin produced by the state banks; bringing at the end a financial balance. Furthermore, in a deeper insight, it promoted the analysis of the power of the Congress and the Constitution, because at the beginning the Constitution was taken as a literal explanation
And the Constitution heavily regarded federalism: The federal and states governments’ roles Were finally delineated in order to limit The power of government,
Daniel Webster argued on behalf of McCulloch that the bank was a necessary and proper way for Congress to conduct the financial affairs of the country (site). and the state had no right to tax. Daniel Webster stated in the case, “An unlimited power to tax involves, necessarily, a power to destroy,” (Wheeler 1905). The decision of Supreme Court was in favor of McCulloch because the bank was created lawfully under the constitution as a function of national government. Moreover, state may impede the federal government and thus Maryland Law that directly taxed the U.S. Bank unconstitutionally interfered with the congressional
The Constitution grants to Congress implied powers for implementing the Constitution's express powers, in order to create a functional national government
The United States Constitution allowed there to be a separation of power in the federal government and between the federal government and the states. This is called checks and balances. The person who came up with the idea of checks and balances was Baron de Montesquieu. Montesquieu thought that a government should be separated into little sections so that it won't become corrupt and enslave its citizens to the law. He said that the government is there to serve the people not the other way around.
They can stretch and interpret the need for laws. Also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, it’s located in article 1, section 8, and clause 18. “Loose Constructionists interpret the Necessary and Proper Clause as expanding the authority of Congress to all areas tangentially related to one of its enumerated powers.” By “expanding the authority” and “all areas tangentially” the writer means that Congress has the power to stretch the meaning of the Constitution. Congress has the power to reach into any area of law that is slightly “related to one of its enumerated powers”.
Ratification DBQ The Constitution is a document that still stands as America’s governing body, proving its strength and ability to stand the test of time. Although some aspects of the document are debated and the argument of what is and what is not constitutional is discussed often, it has proven to be right for America and its people. However, in the late 1700s, not everyone saw the Constitution as strong and supported its state-power-heavy predecessor, The Articles of Confederation.
Maryland remains as one of the United States Supreme Court’s most important decisions and was the very first case in which the Court applied the Necessary and Proper Clause. By establishing the doctrine of implied powers, this decision helped eliminate the need for many amendments that attempted to expand congressional powers. It also enhanced the importance of explicit restraints on congressional powers such as those found in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights (McCulloch v. Maryland, 2014). The case of McCulloch v. Maryland presented the Court with two questions: Did Congress have the authority to incorporate a bank, and was it constitutional to impose a state tax upon such a bank? The answer to the first question, according to Chief Justice Marshall, was yes and to the second was no.
In 1787-1788 eighty-five essays appeared in the New York newspaper, they were supporting the federal constitution, Alexander Hamilton was one of the writers. Hamilton was responding to antifederalist who had claimed that absence of the Bill of Rights and a powerful Judiciary would bring oppression to the people. Hamilton argued that Judiciary was a weak branch of government compared to Executive and Legislature because it lacked an army to command and would only react to what the two branches of the government had proposed. I disagree with the statement by Alexander Hamilton that judiciary is the weakest branch of the government, maybe at that time it could have been viewed as so, but its power has increased through several amendments (Jellum, 2008). The Congress creates law, for example, they created the National Prohibition in the 1920s, and the president executes the laws by ensuring all the laws passed by the Congress are implemented.
The Supreme Court case McCulloch v Maryland originally originated in Maryland when the Maryland legislature decided to levy a tax on all branches of the banks. It was aimed to destroy the Baltimore branch of the Bank of the United States. James McCulloch was a cashier at the Baltimore branch. He was issuing bank notes without complying with the Maryland law. Maryland had sued McCulloch for refusing to pay the taxes under the Maryland statute.
The Constitution entitles the Congress to have great powers, such as being able to pass laws, declare wars, raise armies, impose taxes, regulate interstate commerce, establish federal courts and their jurisdiction, immigration rules, impeach the president if necessary, and much more that the Congress finds necessary for its responsibilities. “While those are still the functions, some aspects have changed. For example, changing a court jurisdiction is mainly used today to send a message, and approving the appointments is more of an assertion of power of Congress over the other branches” (The Logic of American Politics). With law making now as well, there are quite a bit of subcommittees and committees that review the bills and an intricate arrangement
Congress has powers that are very important to society and should certainly stay in their abilities. One power that proves this is the ability to impeach the President, though zero Presidents have been completely impeached by Congress there may come a time when that is a necessity. If Congress
Federalism helped the Constitution guard against tyranny by specifying which powers belong to the Federal government and which ones belong to the State government. This separation leads to a double security so that the state government can watch the federal government and the federal can watch the state. James Madison states in his Federalist Papers #51(Document A), “power surrendered by the people is first divided between two
In other words, Congress grants delegated powers to the president. The Constitution is especially concise when it gets to the heart of the presidency: the powers and duties of the chief executive. It grants the president a limited number of expressed powers, or explicit grants of authority. Because the vagueness of the constitution and because the courts are being biased towards the presidential power, over time the president’s power has evolved into authorities much more powerful than the Framers would have ever imagined.