ipl-logo

Negative Effects Of Hammurabi's Laws

407 Words2 Pages

Hammurabi’s code was written to protect the people of the ancient city of Babylon. However, I think otherwise. Nearly 4,00 years ago, in Babylon, Hammurabi created a set of 282 laws to protect the people that he ruled. On the other hand, I believe that his laws weren’t just to everyone.
To begin with, Hammurabi’s Laws harmed families a lot. For example, Law 129, women are tied up and thrown into water if caught cheating on their husband. This punishment doesn’t apply to men. Also, if a man strikes his father, his hands are then cut off which, in my opinion, is too extreme of a punishment. Based on what I read, I don’t think that it is just to apply a consequence to one group of people, and not the other. This just goes to show Hammurabi …show more content…

For instance, in Law 21, the “victim” could have lied to make it seem that the “robber” wasn’t caught only to get money. This makes it unfair towards the government. Also, in Law 53 and 54, the man who opened his trench had nothing to with it on purpose ye he has to restore the crops he destroyed. Furthermore, these punishments weren’t necessary. This is important because if they hadn’t done anything on purpose they shouldn’t have to receive the punishment. It is evident that the punishments weren’t fair to the innocent.
Additionally, Hammurabi’s code didn’t fully repair personal injury. For example, in Law 199, if someone hurts a slave they have to pay half of the value of the slave. However, if you hurt a free man you get a bigger punishment. In addition, if a man strikes the daughter of a free man, he shall pay ten shekels of silver. But, if a man strikes a slave girl, he only pays two shekels of silver. In my opinion, these laws should have the same consequences to the different people. Overall, Hammurabi’s Code didn’t have the right consequences.
In conclusion, Hammurabi’s Code was not just and had different punishments towards the same crimes. Also, his punishments were way too severe. Hammurabi was not a just ruler of Babylon. Many different people have opinions over this issue. How do you think Hammurabi’s Laws treated the people of

Show More
Related

  • Hammurabi Code Dbq Essay

    1132 Words  | 5 Pages

    Do you think cutting someone's hand off because they striked their father is fair? Hummurabi’s code was just because it helps protect the weak. If someone commits a crime it makes sure no one will do it by using harsh punishments. It also helps protect property and property equaled power. Hammurabi code was created in the empire of Babyloina in Mesopotamia.

    Read More

  • Hammurabi's Code Dbq Analysis

    657 Words  | 3 Pages

    For example, law 195 (Doc C), if a son strikes his father, his hands will be cut off. This is not fair to the child because they would then have no self defence. In our society, this law

    Read More

  • Hammurabi Code Dbq Essay

    798 Words  | 4 Pages

    They are of complete fairness and help protect the security and welfare of the people. These laws concerning property, personal injury, and family would soon shape the way of the Mesopotamian culture. Hammurabi's code concerning family law for example was highly proficient. It brought order and civilian rights regarding family affairs. For instance in Law 195, (Doc C), if a son is to hit his father he shall have his hands cut off.

    Read More

  • What Is Hammurabi's Code Was It Just Dbq

    713 Words  | 3 Pages

    So, he decided to make Hammurabi’s code with 282 laws organized by specific themes. Although a set of laws was needed, the severity of punishments in property and family laws sure outweighed any of the good laws he made. Hammurabi’s code was not just because of his family law. In law 129 it states “if a married lady is caught in adultery with another man, they shall bind them and cast them into the water” (Doc C) and that isn’t just because That’s not fair

    Read More

  • Was Hammurabi's Code Just Dbq Analysis

    775 Words  | 4 Pages

    This law seems, as well, too harsh. The son should get a punishment but getting your hands cut off for hitting his father would lead to son being scared. In conclusion, Hammurabi 's code is unjust. The evidence shows that the Personal Injury Laws didn’t protect all people equally, the Property Laws punishments were too harsh, and the Family Laws can cause someone 's death.

    Read More

  • Hammurabi: A Powerful Ruler Of Babylon

    394 Words  | 2 Pages

    Cutting off a son’s hands if they strike their father - that may seem harsh to us nowadays, but in Hammurabi’s time, this rules united the whole entire empire and maintained order throughout the kingdom. Hammurabi was a powerful ruler of the kingdom of Babylon. He ruled for 42 years and ruled over most of Mesopotamia. Hammurabi became the ruler in 1792 BCE and made many great advancements including: a postal system, an irrigation maintenance system, and most importantly, a code of laws. Hammurabi had a strict code of laws that every citizen of Babylon had to follow.

    Read More

  • Essay On Hammurabi's Code Just

    875 Words  | 4 Pages

    Was Hammurabi’s code just? Nearly 4,000 years ago, a man named Hammurabi became king of a city state called babylon. Hammurabi made a very important code in 18th century B.C.E. Hammurabi made 282 laws and he made these codes to protect the weak and poor from the strong. There are areas of law where Hammurabi’s code can be shown to be both, just and unjust. These are Family Law, Property Law, and Personal Injury Law.

    Read More

  • Hammurabi's Code Vs Modern Law

    489 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hammurabi's code and the modern laws have several similarities and differences. For example, they are both intended to maintain order in society. However, Hammurabi’s code is far more violent than modern law. Also, they have different ways of handling things, different punishments, and different social structure. One way that Hammurabi’s Code and the Modern Laws are different is because Hammurabi’s Code is strictly based on social structure.

    Read More

  • Hammurabi Dbq Essay

    859 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Justice consists not in being neutral between right and wrong, but in finding out the right and upholding it, wherever found against the wrong. ”(Theodore Roosevelt) To start off let’s talk about Hammurabi, a king not many people knew about. Thanks to clay writing tablets found by archaeologist, we know some things about him.

    Read More

  • How Is Hammurabi Unfair

    675 Words  | 3 Pages

    These laws should both have the same consequences because all women should be treated equal. These laws on injury show that Hammurabi's code is very unjust. Hammurabi’s code may have been written to protect everyone, but the laws ended up being excessive and harmful. The laws about family, property, and injury are cruelly excessive and are unequal towards different classes.

    Read More

  • Was Hammurabi's Laws Just Or Unjust?

    334 Words  | 2 Pages

    Thus this proves that Hammurabi 's law is important in keeping people and their possessions safe. Hammurabi 's laws were helpful and fair to the people. Laws like that helped the society become even stronger by keeping people who were done wrong out of the streets. Laws in our time and Hammurabi 's time were important and in the future laws will still help protect people and their property just like they did in Hammurabi

    Read More

  • How Did Hammurabi Impact The World Today

    874 Words  | 4 Pages

    Funk and Wagnall New World Encyclopedia wrote, “The basis of criminal law is that of equal retaliation, comparable to the Semitic law of ‘an eye for an eye’”(“Hammurabi, Code of” 1). Hammurabi was the first to make the law code meaning he was the first to start the foundation for our law system today. He was the father of law and today his justice code is still apparent today. The code of Hammurabi was designed to protect the weak, which includes: women, children and slaves. Funk and Wagnall wrote, “It seeks to protect the weak and the poor, including women, children, and slaves, against injustice at the hands of the rich and powerful”(Hammurabi, Code of” 1).

    Read More

  • How King Hammurabi's Codes Were Unjust?

    701 Words  | 3 Pages

    King Hammurabi’s codes were unjust because of the evidence found in the 282 laws. The codes that King Hammurabi wrote about were personal injury law, property law and family law. First, there is evidence that the codes were unjust. The first, code was personal injury law.

    Read More

  • The Judgments Of Hammurabi In The Tale Of The Eloquent Peasant

    1138 Words  | 5 Pages

    Hammurabi’s code gives judgements and consequences for certain crimes. The punishment for a crime depended on one’s social rank. There were essentially three classes; the priests and noble landlords, the freemen, and slaves. Each law illustrated the division in the societies social status. As a particular law read; “If a man has destroyed the eye of another free man, his own eye shall be destroyed.

    Read More

  • Code Of Hammurabi Essay

    731 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some laws had harsh punishments and other laws you just had to pay for what you did. Hammurabi clearly showed the opposite of equal among the social classes, by favoring the rich and making it harder for the poor. With the different social classes,

    Read More

More about Negative Effects Of Hammurabi's Laws

Open Document