Because Linux is only as secure as it is configured to be, the user must take many precautions to ensure that the server stays secure. Having very little or no security at all can pose a great problem for the system, network, and server, not to mention the company involved. If the server is not secure, the company can be in big trouble as private information can be leaked. Important data that should only been seen by certain employees can possibly be seen by all employees. This could cause a huge problem.
Some people believe books should not be banned in schools/libraries but just because you do not like it does not mean it should be taken away, that is the authors freedom of speech. Also, some say that you should not be exposing bad behavior or language to students but in reality they hear and see these things everyday, and by banning a book, that is not protecting them. Writers have the freedom to write whatever they want and that is a part of the First Amendment, so why banned their book? “The First Amendment allows individuals to speak, publish, read and view what they wish, worship (or not worship) as they wish, associate with
Corrective controls such as having an effective CIRT that can access the laptop and block or delete important information so the theft cannot access the laptop. b. Preventive controls such as a password can be used, but to ensure it stays effective it should be long, include multiple characters, be changed frequently, and not easily be guessed. Other types of
The SEC was proactive in the sense that it allows for tips to be sent in, but they did not take fully investigate the tips sent in. One could argue that there was no point in the whistleblowing system if one is not going to investigate the tips sent in. Another thing to note is the psychological effects of being a whistleblower on Harry Markopolos. In order for a whistleblowing system to be effective, the system should contain anonymity, the possibility of reporting to an independent party, provide any means to make the report, and a follow-up. The SEC failed in the follow-up.
An honor code can be so effective that “many schools with academic honor codes allow students to take their exams without proctors present, relying on peer monitoring to control cheating” (Source F). Despite this system, there is research that “indicates that the significantly lower levels cheating” (Source F) at schools with honor codes. This is possible because there is a peer culture that denounces cheating, making kids embarrassed to commit academic dishonesty. Such a peer culture was formed by educating the students about the value of academic dishonesty. Subsequently, the attempts made by schools with honor codes to promote the value of academic integrity have proven that when properly implemented, an honor code can be highly
There is a possibility that a kid who is planning a shooting could just be in a classroom and find out were his/her teacher keeps the weapon, and they wouldn 't even have to sneak a gun in. That’s a downside but what if we made gun safes that only opened with a teachers ID or own password making it almost impossible for a student to open it. Conclusion By arming teachers there are alot more positives than negatives, Yes bad things can happen with a deadly weapon in a classroom but people will continue to do these horrific crimes knowing there is hardly anything that’s going to stop them. So by arming teachers this will give some fear in a potential shooters eyes versus a shooter knowing they can march into any school they want to and kill students and teachers without anyone putting up a fight until first responders getting to the
This could lead to danger because he could leak more top secret files from the U.S. government that could eventually cause fright to the public, putting society on edge. The whole point of having a government is to lead and guide the public of the United States away from any danger or commotion that could be currently happening over the nation. Snowden should not be trusted and if anything, he should be feared for his defiance of the laws of the United States. Edward is not above the law and it is unjust that he has not gone to jail for an illegal task he had
There’s an old saying that “sticks and stones may break your bones, but words will never hurt you.” In reality, that saying is wrong. Words hurt a person as much as punch or a kick can. It may not hurt someone physically, but it can scar someone mentally and emotionally. Due to the topics they are associated with, certain words or phrases can elicit strong reactions; some are positive, while others are negative but nonetheless, they all leave an impact on people. Today in class, we discussed a topic that is deeply engraved in American history yet widely avoided by many: race.
Therefore, technology allows them to prevent wasting their valuable time by helping them find and search for whatever they want, as well as by delivering them results that are straightforward and to the point. Many critics may argue and say that technology in education is dangerous. It can waste a students’ time by getting him or her sidetracked by distractions they find online. However when students avoid technology in education, they have to spend long hours, days, maybe even weeks searching for certain information in various different books. Students that really want to learn will force discipline upon themselves.
Well online learning can help with that in a major way. "Depending on the level of interaction in the classroom setting, shy students may be allowed to attend classes without providing alternative ways to communicate ideas". I say this because it only makes it harder if the student is shy. An example of this situation could be he or she could have a question, but thinks dumb so they won 't ask. I have done this several times myself.
On the other hand, students will want to cheat if everyone is doing it. Honor codes that are reinforced by peers will still cheat because the tolerance isn’t as high if the administrators of the schools reinforced them. Most honor codes have many different levels of consequences; it all depends how much it’s going to weigh on the cheaters if it’s possible for them to do so. Within many schools, there are “some sort academic dishonesty culture, thus causing more to encourage others to cheat”, (Source C). It’s so easy for them to cheat and get away with it because everyone is doing it that there’s really no need for a honor code to be put in place at
The biggest benefit of the Fourth Amendment is that it deters searches. A search under the Fourth Amendment is “when a governmental employee or an agent of the government violates an individual 's reasonable expectation of privacy” (Legal Information). If the government were to invade a citizen’s property no law enforcement shall search the human, but upon probable cause. The court will be the one to tell if the search falls under the Fourth Amendment, if it were to fall under the Fourth Amendment the citizen would not be searched. In addition, when the law enforcement believes searching a citizen is reasonable, no excessive force shall be used.
Second, treating camera as if it as evidence. With these two steps it is possible for state and local law enforcement to maintain the Integrity of photographs. First with cameras in which law enforcement use have special software on them allowing them to be used but not allowing the photographs to be edited and anyway otherwise the file will be destroyed. The software however is not perfect because given the time somebody put
The First Amendment says that we are in tiled to your own freedom of speech even as a minor. In schools the teachers are trying to limit what students can say, do, or wear. There should be some restrictions placed but not as many as there are. It should stay where students have freedom of speech because it opens students up for more opinion in the class and on there work. It also lets students feel like they are not being controlled by someone.
It’s not a bad idea to make groups for each permission and explain to them they have file shares that their group applies to. Never use the Full Control permission because it leaves a huge security hole for your company. I personally like the solutions of having users understand what each permission does and explaining this information is not to be abused, but you cannot control everything. If a user continues to abuse company police, then a company may have legal ramifications. Even if you give an employee a fileshare permission, they simply cannot abuse it because the fileshare is under intellectual property of the company.