In the past traditional family, the husband becomes the breadwinner of the family and the wife becomes homemakers and take care of the childrens. Now, the situation changed and the women needs to play the role to support the financial need of the family. The statics shows that the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) increases from 255 billion USD (2010) to 296.4 billion USD (2016) which causes the rise in global economy.(gdp-growth, n.d. ). Women need to work to overcome the financial stress in the family which cause by increase in cost of living. The purpose of the essay is to explain the positive and negative implication of working mothers towards their children’s development. The scope of the essay is the development of the childrens of working …show more content…
They share the expenses of the family with the husband to fulfill the financial commitments. Family income appears to be more strongly related to the children’s ability and achievement than to their emotional outcomes. (Brooks-Gunn,J. & Duncan,G.J . ,1997). Moreover, working mothers can provide safer and comfortable shelter for the children. Next, they can enhance learning opportunities in academic and extracurricular activities that makes their future bright. On the other hand, working mothers able to provide high nutritional food for mental and physical development of the children.The stay at home mothers unable to help the children financially. They need to depend fully on the father’s income.The income of one parent mostly not enough to give better and comfortable life for children. The timing of poverty also seems to be important for certain child outcomes. (Brooks-Gunn,J . & Duncan,G.J. ,2017)
2.2 Positive Implications
The children of working mothers will be more independent. They become more responsible for themselves because no one is there to take care of them. Besides that, they become less reliant towards their parents. Furthermore, they able to deal with their daily routines more effectively. For example, the son of a working mother able to cook simple foods, wash the dishes and do their laundry. The children of stay at home mother less likely to be independent because
…show more content…
The mother tries to make the children happy with less control in the short time that they spend together. The working mother has less attention to take care every single part of the children’s daily life, they may use whatever the way which can make them happy to fill their guilty of did not spend enough time for children. (Hawkes, 2007). Although the children are independent but they easily indulge themselves in drugs, alcohol and gambles due to less care from parents. Moreover, the less care of the mother causes the commit crime due to peer pressure.
3.0 Conclusion
In conclusion, mothers plays a vital role in childrens development.Working mother need to divide their time for work and childrens.The positive impacts on working mothers are they able provide financial security for the children and the children will be more independent while negative impacts are the child might face psychological problems and they will not have good self control. I feel that the working mothers able to provide a comfortable home and enhance the learning opportunities for the children while providing healthy food for their
The speaker of the speech is Florence Kelley. She was a political and social reformer that fought heavily for the fairness of children’s rights in America during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The occasion for writing this piece was the amount of children working in factories during the period to support their families. The intended audience of the speech were America’s leaders since she wanted to give children regulations work hours. The purpose of writing this speech is to get her message across which is that children should have to be work in the factories, that is for older men and women.
With these responsibilities of a mother, the girls would have to sacrifice their time, which means that they are more likely to drop out of school to fulfill
As Kelley describes the rapidly increasing wage earning class of young girls, she uses parallel structure and repetition as she says that men, women, youth, and boys all “increase” (115). Asserting that age is not relevant in this work force by grouping men, women, and children all in the same list, Kelley is able to highlight the difference between these categories and make it seem unfair to her audience that they should all be thrown into the same work force. Using an oxymoron to describe how working all night may be beneficial for one person and unfortunate for another, she refers to the child’s work as a “pitiful privilege” (116). The contrasting nature of these two words emphasize the fact that work is inevitably something that must be done and while it is a privilege for men and women to have work to earn money, it is pitiful for children to bear the burden of this responsibility as they are so young. Expanding on this connection between the lives of the children and her audience, Kelley uses a hypothetical example of a child carrying “her pail of midnight luncheon” while an adult could carry “their midday luncheon” (116).
(Document 7). This shows that some children weren’t properly cared for in their job. They later made rules to better the working environment for men and women. Children also started working at a very young age. For instance,” C:
This next document shows the negative side of children working in the factories "This shows the ugly side of child labor, Lack of safety features/unsafe working conditions, the children working are very young they are obviously not in school/lack of education” (Document8). In this document they talk about how children working in these factories don’t get a good education, they do not have enough time to attend school. It also shows how they are very easily injured from working in these harsh conditions. Not only was there unequal pay for women, boys, and girls, but there was
During the early 1900’s and the years before, it was common for children to work in factories, mills, and any other industrial jobs. Families at the time depended on the income these children earned. Concern began to raise of the effects these strenuous jobs and long hours had on children. These long hours deprived these children of their education; children would work sixty to seventy hours a week. It was rare for working children to get fresh air, time to play and enjoy their youth.
Kelly writes about children’s labor crises and women’s suffrage, and refers to pathos and ethos throughout the passage. Using these rhetorical devices the reader can get a feel for the writer’s opinion on the topics. The child labor aspect of the essay talks about how children are working night or day shifts that can last up to 12 hours. Kids starting at six years old work in mills to provide for their families at such a young age; Which is convenient for Kelley as she makes the reader feel pity and sympathy for the children.
The parents of these children would send them to work in hope to increase their families incomes. As a result of the new increase of child and women's labor the conditions for working
The educated people were serious about the situation of children being forced to work however the voices against this was never risen. The industrial bosses isolated the workplace from the access of journalism and photographers, who they thought could possibly cover the issue in national media and the government would be forced to take the action against it. The image by Lewis Hine which displays the terrible situation of children standing over the functioning machine to get the work done is heartbreaking (The History). The picture is enough to say about the working condition and the safety measures of the contemporary situation. The children who worked on factories had to work 12-18 hours, six days a week for a dollar or often they need to work as long as work is not accomplished.
Women’s success in the labour force ultimately showed that the ideal of a family in which the mother stayed at home to look after the children while
After reading Upton Sinclair’s book, The Jungle, child labor, urbanization, industrialization and immigration are problem quite sore during 1880-1910 period. Firstly, the future of the world depends on the child. However, the lives of children today are causing people to worry about. According to the Labor Law, provisions on workers be aged 16 years or older, able to work, working under labor contracts, paid and subject to the management and administration of the employer.
Explain this statement. What appears to be the effects on children when both partners work outside the home? What can parents do in order to be sure they do not shortchange their children
In her conventional view, a woman must support her husband by creating an organized home and nurturing him. Women are not only in charge of doing the housework and childcare, but they have their own individual dreams they want to reach. It is discriminatory towards women when they live under the social expectations of being uneducated and a supported wife. From the textual support, it is evident that women struggle to reach their individual goals under a male-dominant society that require women to be
In a family there are many different roles; there's the role of the mother, the father, the child, the grandparents, then there’s the brothers and sisters. Every single one of those roles has different responsibilities. The father, according to most of society, is supposed to be the breadwinner for the family. However, nowadays the mother is actually quite capable of being the breadwinner just as much of as the father. As they work to show their children what it is to be an adult they are teaching them as well on how to be an active member of society.
We all know that parents, since the child is born, are always by their child’s side since they share a same home and should be the one to monitor their children while he or she is growing up. David P. Farrington (Farrington, n.d) stated that family factor, poor parental child-rearing methods especially lack of guidance and control from parents, is the most common answer when people are asked about the main cause of crimes. Moreover, according to Lieb Roxanne (1994), family components can predict an early sign of delinquency. Some weak way of predictions are based on the socioeconomic status of the family, and the less affection of the child to parents. However, the lack of guidance and letting the child to feel being unwanted is a strong predictor or root of