The democratic system respects and acknowledges the worth of all citizens ideally. The majority of individuals would like to follow the rules because governors have legitimacy to represent government. In addition, democracy attaches great importance to security, equality, and humans’ freedom. Hence, I support the democracy, which is better for citizens. Actually, a democracy can be either direct or
Actually, when it comes the moment of truth, people without a democratic mentality will reject the simple public advocacy of certain ideas considering them improper, and they will carefully avoid voting on them, even if they may have a guarantee of winning. What these people do not want is the spirit of others being contaminated by ideas they may consider as dangerous. Perhaps, deep down they are afraid to be wrong, but it costs too much to admit it. People’s Epistemic Limitations on Democracy The previous analysed aspects are closely related to the epistemic foundations of democracy. As some experts put it, democracy can be considered at the same time as a wonderful epistemic device, but also the most profound and disturbing mark of our epistemic limitations, disturbing specifically for those people who lack epistemic humility.
Both forms of government tend to use a representational system — i.e., citizens vote to elect politicians to represent their interests and form the government. In a republic, a constitution or charter of rights protects certain inalienable rights that cannot be taken away by the government, even if it has been elected by a majority of voters. In a democracy the majority is not restrained in this way and can impose its will on the minority. Most modern nations are democratic republics with a constitution, which can be amended by a popularly elected government. This comparison therefore contrasts the form of government in most countries today with a theoretical construct of a democracy, mainly to highlight the features of a republic.
Democracy is a form of governance in which the supreme powers are vested in the hands of people and is exercised by them indirectly or directly through a system of representation usually involving periodic fair elections (http://www.zesn.org.zw/publications/publication_280.pdf). Most importantly, the rule of is needed to ensure that governors are held accountable through elections that are free and fair (Rose, R 2009) Democracy really means nothing or less than the rule of people,
It constitutes and guarantees “basic personal and political rights, fair and free elections and independent courts of law” (Jud, n.d., Modern Definition section, para. 2). Focusing on the individual, democracy is often regarded the best form of government. The purpose of this paper is to assess the strengths and weaknesses of democracy and evaluate the aforementioned consideration. Firstly, a widely discussed aspect of democracy is economic well-being and potential for economic growth.
However a problem in this system is the fact that the majority gets to decide which laws get passed and which don't. Democracy is a system where the majority rules. Peter Singer writes, ““It has long been recognized that there is a danger of injustice in democracy because the democratic system takes no account of the intensity with which views are held, so that a majority which does not care very much about an issue can out-vote a minority for which the issue is of vital concern. By civil disobedience the minority can represent the intensity of its feelings to the
According to the Merriam - Webster Dictionary, “Democracy is a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections.” The word 'democracy ' has its origins in the Greek language. It combines two shorter words: 'demos ' meaning whole citizen living within a particular city or state and 'kratos ' which means power or rule. Democracy introduced a system in which each individual person has a vote on who they want as their rulers and how structures function in a country, with whatever the most people vote for wins. There is no king nor tyrant, and any citizen holds the right to propose a new law. With
Because democracy is not based on quality, but on quantity. The majority party has the authority in power. In addition, people who do not have the intelligence, vision and corrupt could have been elected to state officials. That mean the country government by incompetent persons, democracy can only be run by people who are not competent. Because in a parliamentary, every citizen is allowed to take part, while not everyone is suited to that role.
Democracies Democracy on a whole is the political system most encouraged by many international institutions such as the UN, the IMF and various NGO´s. “For many people, democracy is not just about a series of elections, institutions and rules, it is a life based on mutual respect and the capacity to be a political agent” (Taylor, 2014 p. 290) In conventional understandings of democracy it is generalized that the best democracies are those of western countries. (Taylor, 2014 p. 305) In most western countries democracy is seen as an effective and virtuous
As a form of government it means that the legal power in the communities vested in the people as a whole and the rule belongs to the majority in the electorate in communities which act by voting. Democracy also signifies a way of life. It is principle of the action of the human spirit, the principle that free spirits in the area of social and political actions of individual life should freely guide themselves to freely determined ends. It is also a system of institution, operative in a political community which enables the principle to be realized and serves as the means of its