SESSION 4 : RESOLVING CONFLICT THROUGH NEGOTIATION There are two types of Negotiations: Competitive (win-lose) v/s. Collaborative (win-win) Competitive also known as distributive in which : • There is a winner and a loser • Resources are not divided equally among each other. • There is a conflict of interest • Either party looks at increasing their benefits • The various strategies involved include Control, Coercion and withholding information. Collaborative is also called as integrative or the win-win approach. • Resources are divided in a manner that both sides win. • Main objective is to have optimum returns to both parties • Approaches include cooperation, sharing information & mutual problem solving. This approach is also …show more content…
• Hostile aggressive • Simulated by rage or weakness • Impatient if others don’t see “the obvious” immediately • Short-term gains with long-term loses How to deal with them : • Don’t argue with what the other person says or try to cut him or her down • Maintain eye contact • Repeat their name to get their attention “you interupted me” Snipers: • Rarely results in action like the tank • Response to an unresolved or unheeded problem • Perceive they have power to affect organization even if untrue • Hides behind crowds and social constraints How to deal with them : • Prevent sniping by setting up regular problem solving meetings • if you’re a third party to the sniping, stay out of the middle of it but insist that it stop in front of …show more content…
They were involved in a bitter argument about their father’s will. As per the will, the ancestral home was to go to Radha who was staying in a rented house and not very strong financially. At that time Ramya was a spinster. Ramya was a successful banker getting a handsome income. Ramya got her father’s personal possessions worth about 3 lakh rupees. Ramya contested the will in court on the grounds that her father was not in a sound mind while drafting the will. However her lawyers could not prove this and the court upheld the will. Ramya’s son Karthik realises that his mother is in her last days. He does not wish to see his mother to die without solving this family dispute Karthik’s cousin tells him that Radha was keen on mending fences with Ramya. He somehow convinces Ramya to meet Radha. The meeting turns out to be a fiasco. Radha and Ramya end up having a big argument. Karthik tries to keep his mother calm, wanting her to see Radha’s point of view. This results in Ramya accusing Karthik of plotting against his own mother. She asks him to get lost and not show his face ever
If deeply entrenched parties select "compromise" as their negotiating tactic, what are the possible downsides to such an agreement? I know that they will try to get as much of the pie as possible, the more one side claims, the less the other side gets or a "win-lose" negotiation. To claim value in a negotiation, you must use competitive tactics to try to convince the other side that he wants what you have to offer much more than you want what he has. Tactics for "winning" is conceding slowly, exaggerating and minimize the value of your concessions, arguing forcefully for a favorable settlement, and being willing to outwait your opponent.
This conveys the other cruel side of Nagaina’s loyalty to her family, in which revenge for the death of her Nag is sought. This step is one that Rikki Tikki never took, although it still displays great courage on Nagaina’s part to make a move so
The Grapes of Wrath portrays contemporary people 's actions during the long journey from Oklahoma to California. As Joad 's family travels from Oklahoma to California, their dreams and hopes are slowly crushed. When Joads struggle while facing difficulties, Ma plays a significant role: the citadel holding family all together in this hectic migration. Regardless of gender rules, Steinbeck demonstrates Ma as the real head of the household instead of Pa, driven by the responsibility and leadership within motherhood. Ma plays both mother and father figure which consequently might make Pa Joad as a useless character.
He knows all about who Mumtaz is and what he is doing for her. He continues to hide the truth about what Lakshmi, a 13 year old girl, is going to be forced to do. He talks about being her protector, but he is taking her to a place where she will be a sex slave. “Don't be afraid, I will take care of you” (McCormick
Introduction A company’s success is measured by how well it is structured and organized in order to adapt to the changes in environment as well as the changes within itself such as the company’s scale, employees, product scope, etc. Having a suitable, well-structured organizational frame will not only increase the chance of being success but also prolong the company’s lifespan compared to an un-structured one. It is important to note that an organization’s structure needs to fit in with the current situation and does not necessarily required remain unchanged over time. Taking Dynacorp as an example, even though its functional structure contributed to the vast growth of the company at the start, its limitation in dealing with the changes within
He, at one point, thinks the old woman is the woman he was talking to but then decides no. Woman fails at getting to love her as she is. Ram learns that there is another Indian living in the building and the Indian keeps wanting to talk with him. Ram is scared if he talks to the Indian his cover would be blown and he would have to leave. He tries to get the other Indian kicked out, but instead the landlord sees that Ram is not Indian and kicks him out instead.
Premila says,“We’re going home for good” (Rau,32). Santha was very confused because the school day was not finished. When the sisters came home their mother and ayah were very concerned. Premila talks about her insular teacher and states,“She said it was because Indians cheat” (Rau,38). Premila added,“So I don't think we should go back to that school”(Rau,38).
They try to smooth over or ignore conflict to keep everybody happy, they see conflict as destructive and will give in to others to maintain the peace (Page 38), Bryan is a very good Illustration of accommodation he sacrifice his needs for the group, he share’s his lunch with John, he writes the last easy for the group, he maintain peace among the group when john and andy was arguing. Even though bryan is trying trying to keep the peace in the group, he is has problems with himself and he sense unfairness and inequality throughout the film. Collaborating is a strategy is used in a I win, you win Situation. According to Patterson James “ The problem-solving or collaboration strategy is usually the best approach to win-win negations and the problem- solving strategy is usually the best way to cut through conflict. Make a decision and work toward win-win deals (page 41).
This approach is timed and can benefit
A wise person once said, “If you have something worth fighting for, then fight for it.” . The main character Samuel, is in a situation where he has to fight to get back his loved ones. The Wood Runner a must-read tale that teaches a valuable life lesson that holds true even for toys teenager: Fighting for what you want can have a positive outcome. In the Wood Runner, the author uses conflict to teach that you must fight for what you want, and let nothing get in the way of it.
Conflict resolution as a field of study as indicated has formed hypothetical bits of knowledge into the nature and source of conflict and how conflicts can be resolved through peaceful systems to effectuate a dependable settlement. Morton Deutsch, was the first to form and understanding into the helpful results of collaboration as a scholastic enquiry. In his view, various variables like the way of the debate and the objectives every group in a conflict goes for are crucial in deciding the sort of introduction a group would convey to the negotiation table in its endeavor to unravel the conflict (Morton Deucth, 1985, p.24). To him, two essential orientations do exist. These are competitive and cooperative.
As described earlier in the introduction part, I have recalled different courses of negotiation in my life from which I have tried to figure out my weaknesses and strengths. Before the negotiation course, I could only realize some of my capacity and limits, for example I might be good at emotional control and bad at active listening. I believed they were not all the weaknesses and strengths that I should realize. In addition, I found it hard to hone my strengths and improve my weaknesses because (i) I did not see negotiation in systematic viewpoint (ii) I have not had enough negotiation experiences. Thankfully, this course has shed the new light on the wide scope of negotiations and how they should be conducted.
The case “Alpha – Beta” is a very interesting case, which could be considered as one of my most favorable cases so far. What interested me was the fact that we had to act totally different from our conventional style. In fact, we were asked to behave collectively, formally, indirectly, patiently, unemotionally and passively. Although we could not make the deal, we all found this outcome understandable and predictable. What we learned from the exercise was to be aware of the existence of cross-cultural differences as well as how these differences affect our negotiation outcomes, then find out what should we do in the similar negotiation in our future.
The use of power based negotiation can foster mistrust and anger. The parties view each other as adversaries, and can withhold information that may hinder the negotiation. One of the major downsize of power based negotiations is that the parties may lose sight of the real issue. Personal Application As a
Compromising is moderate in both assertiveness and cooperativeness. The objective is to find some expedient, mutually acceptable solution that partially satisfies both parties. In some situations, compromising might mean splitting the difference between the two positions, exchanging concessions, or seeking a quick middle-ground