There have been many deranged world leaders through the course of history, but few rival Nero, the fifth Roman Emperor and final emperor of the Julio-Claudian dynasty. To begin his insane rule during his quest for power, Nero is said to have killed both his mother and wife in cold blood. Nero is infamous throughout history for being the Emperor who watches his own capital of Rome burn while playing the fiddle. However, the absurdity of these stories leads people to question the authenticity. Nevertheless, Nero’s unpopularity within the elite of Rome led to his tragic death. Nero experienced loss at the very young age of two when his father died. Although the death of his father was terrible, without it Nero would not have been emperor. Nero’s …show more content…
Nero’s mother kept him grounded and without her, no one was able to control Nero. Furthermore, Nero and Octavia’s marriage was falling apart due to the fact that Octavia was unable to conceive a child. After failing to strangle her, Nero has her imprisoned and executed for adultery. That same year, still in need of an heir, Nero married his second wife, Poppaea Sabina. This time they were able to conceive and Poppaea Sabina gave birth to a girl. Within three months, this child died, but soon she fell pregnant again. During this second pregnancy, Pappaea Sabina tragically died; it was rumored to be because Nero kicked her stomach out of anger. In addition, Nero always dreamed of being a performer, rather than the Emperor, and was determined to perform to the masses. His advisors did what they could to keep him off the main stage, trying to keep him satisfied with private performances, but soon Nero began to use himself as a symbol for Apollo. By rebranding to the god of music and the sun, Nero attended even more festivals in his honor, waiting for his turn to …show more content…
The idea behind the plot was to overthrow Nero and replace him with senator and orator Gaius Calpurnius Piso. Piso was very respected, so many senators, equestrians, and soldiers supported the plot to have him on the throne. Majority of the participants supported the plot because of hatred for Nero and his rulings, others were in it for personal revenge, but some, like Piso, believed it was for the good of the republic to dispose of Nero. There were many disagreements leading up to the assassination attempt about how it should be done. This disagreement caused impatience among members and the plot was almost uncovered. A woman decided to meet with sailors of Nero and when she heard he felt overlooked by the Emperor, she told him the plot. This sailor then reported it to Nero, and the plotters panicked. Rushed, they eventually decided to assassinate Nero at the games. The plot was uncovered when one of the conspirators asked for healing supplies from his slaves and one of the slaves grew suspicious of the use and went to the palace to alert the Emperor. When the Emperor heard of the plot, he had 17 of the conspirators exiled or executed and forced Gaius Calpurnius Piso into suicide. This plot made Nero very paranoid and realize that his days were numbered. A few years later, a governor named Servius Sulpicius Galba rose against Nero, and the public was on his
Nero was just sixteen when the emperor Claudius died and was named as princeps after he bribed the Praetorian guards to secure his succession. Wary of any rival to his power, he ordered the execution of Britannicus, Claudius’ son with Messalina, as well as the exile Agrippina, his own mother. Nero’s first five years of reign were generally peaceful but he would soon sink to madness after this. He had his own mother killed, became increasingly corrupt, and wasted Rome’s tax money for his vices.
He wanted revenge for is brother after he was illegally murdered. Bradley states that “…according to the aims [Gaius] wished to achieve (to avenge Tiberius’ death, to alleviate unemployment and to weaken the senate)” (1990). Undoubtedly, he wished to undermine the senate after what they did because the should have been persecuted, but were not. Furthermore, Bradley suggests that Gaius’ motives for his reforms were to relive the suffering of the urban unemployed and poor people, as well as to further the agriculture law that Tiberius re-enacted (1990, p.251-255). By doing this, he is helping the plebeians by letting them have more opportunities, but especially to make Rome fairer.
Nero now became the adopted son of the emperor. Claudius already had a son named Britannicus, but Agrippina wanted Nero to be the next emperor. She convinced Claudius to name Nero as the heir to the throne. Nero also married the emperor's daughter Octavia to further secure the throne. At the age of 14, Nero was appointed to the position of proconsul.
Nero’s first five years of ruling were led by his tutors, until he split the senatorial elite and it all went bad from there. Until the death of his mother eliminated a giant restraint “Nero relied largely on Seneca and Burrus for guidance”; he also was good to his people and gave to the poor in his first five years of rule (“Nero” 3). “His growing insecurity” led him to eliminate “rivals and lavish expenditures of his later years led him to” steal property , in the crisis of 68 he failed to realize “he still had the support of his people” at which point in time he lost (Scarre
This paper aims to make an insightful comparison of two great leaders of history whom were assassinated by conspirators during the height of their political lives. By exploring the assassination and lives of these two men we can more clearly understand the historical and social events that underpin a conspiracy as grand as these. The life and death of Julius Caesar is one of the original grand conspiracies in history, as his ambition grew so did the envy of his fellow senators. Julius Caesar was born to a noble family and inherited a relatively high status in ancient Rome’s hierarchy.
By painting a good picture of Caesar the plebeians are starting to question Brutus’ speech. They start to wonder if Rome would actually be better off without Caesar. Antony planted the seed for the plebeians to turn against the conspirators. Proving Caesar to not be ambitious convinced the Romans that Brutus and the rest of the conspirators were at fault and resulted in them rebelling against the conspirators who then fled from
Nero was a horrible leader. He was considered a tyrant, which is a cruel oppressive ruler. In 64 CE, there was a fire in Rome. While he tried to blame it on the Christians, he was accused of setting the fire. It got to his head and sooner or later, he was forced to commit suicide.
He was very social with the emperors of surrounding lands and would often give them gifts. But all of these good deeds did not make up for the atrocities he committed beforehand. Nero’s family was known for being very harsh and he carried on this trait. He created brutal games for public amusement, often involving senators and high ranking officials competing in fights against animals. Nero loved money and he would create new laws that give him more money, and would often put Rome in debt.
HISTORY-Nero Emperor Nero Arguably the Worst Emperors of Rome Nero’s life was not the best but he also was not the best person. He also dealt with fires and multiple disasters. He made people listen to him sing, made them suffer being burned at the stake, and more. He is also arguably one of the world’s worst Roman emperors in the entire history of Rome. I say arguably because he also did many things in the beginning of his rein of power like lowering the taxes, plays, and games.
As of almost all the documents that were recorded, history has come to blame Nero for the disaster of the Great Fire Of Rome. Historians implied that Nero started the fire so that he could bypass the senate and build Rome back up to how he envisioned it to be after the civilization was burnt to the ground. Burning down Rome also made way for him to build the Golden House. Most of what we know about the Great Fire Of Rome has been documented by the historian Tacitus who claimed that Nero watched over the burning Rome while merrily playing his fiddle. From what is taken from Tacitus, the Great Fire Of Rome burnt down 10 out of 14 of Rome's districts.
From her mother, she inherited beauty and ambition in equal measure” (Holland 98). Pregnant Poppaea gave birth to, Princess Claudia, in January of 63 but Claudia died four months later. Years later, Poppaea got pregnant for the second time and this time both the baby and Poppaea died from hemorrhaging, possibly hemorrhaging inflicted by Nero. After Poppaea’s death, Nero married his third wife Statilia
“He was carried away above all by popularity and he was jealous of everyone who in any way stirred the feelings of the common people.” Nero was a handsome young man with blueish gray eyes and light to blond hair with a face with pretty amature features. But behind that handsome face is a vengeful personality. Along with all of the people he had killed in Rome's great fire, but by year 59 when he was 21, he was ready to get rid of his own mother. Agrippina had been manipulating Nero for her own good.
He describes how the fire allowed Emperor Nero to carry out his ambitious plans for rebuilding the city, but also how Nero was blamed for starting the fire and subsequently persecuted Christians as scapegoats (Tacitus, Annals 15). Tacitus is known for his critical approach to the Roman Empire and its ruler, Nero. For example, Tacitus describes how the fire began and spread, the efforts of the people to extinguish it, and the destruction caused by the flames. He describes the fire as a catastrophic event that lasted for six days and seven nights destroying much of the city. Tacitus describes the fire as a devastating event that destroyed much of Rome and left many citizens homeless.
First and foremost, the conspirators did a rather poor job of conspiring their conspiracy. They miscalculated the amazing of reinforcement Caesar had. After the assassination, they were afraid they they might be murdered by by a mob. The conspirators only managed to create an uprising controversy. The
"He who fiddled while Rome burned. " This phrase has become synonymous with the infamous emperor Nero, a man whose reign was marked by both grand accomplishments and devastating failures. But who was Nero, really? Was he truly the ruthless tyrant that history has painted him to be, or was he a victim of circumstance and bad press? As we delve into the life and legacy of Nero, we will explore the complex and controversial figure who ruled the Roman Empire during the first century AD.