Snitow and Kaufman’s study was on the water crisis in the United states and the impacts it is making. People don’t realize this, but the water crisis has become more and more of a problem in the United States. Snitow and Kauffman give a lot of valuable information on topics such as making water private. This privatization of water is allowing for companies and corporations to take control of water rather than it being a public resource, like it is supposed to be. In the text it says, “The conservative agenda of small government, deregulation, and privatization has given big business an opening to create a private water market to replace a public service.” (Snitow and Kaufman, 7) This quote explains how not only privatization, but also conservative agendas and deregulation have allowed businesses to create their own private water markets to make people pay much more money for water, rather than the people getting the water from a public source.
Second, it acknowledges the readers initial response and points out the flaws in their reason in effect making his argument
This appeal is the result of reasoning and extrapolating a conclusion from a
Leonard’s argument to switch to tap water is effective because of her rhetorical strategies of comparing and contrasting as well as analyzing cause and effect. Both techniques coincide to effectively strengthen and justify her argument in sifting away from plastic, and towards a cleaner, cheaper, and easier way to drink water. To better legitimize her a reasoning as to why tap is, in many ways, better than bottled water, Leonard compares and contrast the distinct characteristics between the two. Leonard research proves that many of the claims
We all drink water. Whether we like it cold, lukewarm, or in small amounts because it can taste so bland, we all drink it. Something that most of us do is buy and drink bottles of water because it is convenient for those of us who have a busy schedule. Most importantly, we buy it because from what we expect, it is the most safe option. Yet, what if it is not the safest option. Although we have all heard the rumors and comments about the harmful effects of water bottles, most of us have never really made it a priority to understand the actual health risks of drinking it. We have also brushed off the horrific facts of what it actually does to our planet regardless of the endless amount of television commercials that are trying to grab our attention. It is widely ignored and believed to just be another meaningless hoax, just as Donald Trump believes that Al Gore is a Chinese
Then, she argues about how the water consumption is being regulated by the government to preserve as much as they can for future generation. By going through these arguments Joan is
Water is an essential need for the human body. And the way you consume water is also a major factor. There is no problems with drinking tap water, this tap water has gone through so many processes to make sure you are receiving the cleanest water possible. These processes are made to ensure that all guidelines are followed and to make sure there is nothing in the water that can harm you. Although all these processes are done ome people may still disagree and say that drinking tap water is not the “best” for our bodies. Some of the pros to drinking bottled water is after storms or natural disasters the tap water can be compromised, in Document 2 it states, “Moreover, the water from public water systems is often compromised after emergency situations
On the shores of the Attawapiskat Lake, about 18 hours north west of Barrie, lies the band of the Neskantaga First Nations, where only a portion of the population remains. The other portion leave, because of the large amounts of poverty and the isolation. This First Nations Community has been under a water boil advisory for over 20 years. Their current water filtration system hasn’t worked since 1995, and even when it did work it removed sand and grit, but left in harmful chemicals. The government gives the Neskantaga people $250,000 annually, which goes towards running a water treatment system that continuously tests positive for harmful chemicals after being filtered.
The recent trend of Americans carrying bottled water can be explained by its convenience, as it can be purchased in vending machines and grocery stores, and is a healthier choice than soda. In addition, carrying bottled water is a good idea to maintain one’s hydration throughout the day (“Tap Water or Bottled?,” 2006). Although dehydration, or loss of water from the body, is not a concern for many Americans, people who exercise without drinking, sick children and the elderly are susceptible to its effects. Affected individuals will experience thirst, headache, fatigue, and dizziness. In addition, if exercise is undertaken under conditions of dehydration a person may experience muscle cramp or ache (“The ‘8 glasses per day’ rule,” 2006).
(1) In Tamara ’s Take she explains why tap water is better than bottled water. She discusses her research and uses her finding to support her claim. She also discusses the environmental burdens of plastic bottled water.
The given argument is WCQP radio station in Rockville has increased number of audience due to increased call-in advice programs. The radio station KICK is advised to do the same to gain larger audience in Medway. To evaluate this argument we need significant amount of information, which can strengthen or weaken the argument. Firstly, the argument is talking about two different radio stations WCQP and KICK which are in two cities Rockville and Medway.
Argumentative Essay: Is Tap Water Better than Bottled Water? Bottled water ranks high among the fastest growing product in the beverage market/industry around the world. In other words, the world’s consumption of the bottled water is on the increase.