Nestle's Water Argument

289 Words2 Pages
To put this argument into standard form, the premises are that groundwater sources and limited, Ontario is suffering from a water crisis, and that Nestle makes millions of dollars from water while only spending 15$ a day on removing it. Therefore, for all the reasons stated, it should be apparent that Nestle shouldn’t be removing Ontario’s water. The conclusion to this argument has to be valid, as all of the premises properly support the conclusion. They’re all facts that promote the idea that Nestle removing water from Ontario to sell is a poor idea, therefore, they shouldn’t be allowed to do so and should be stopped. This also means that the argument is a sound one, as the conclusion is valid and the premises are true facts. The argument
Open Document