The first one is the contradiction between farmers and landlord, also a contradiction between farmers and new dynasty. The fierce confrontation between farmers and old dynasty, landlord tends to ease at the start of a new dynasty. If the new dynasty rulers adopted a series of policies to ease the conflict, such as minimal tax burden, straighten officialdom, austerity, etc., it can resume production and economic prosperity. Examples include the prosperity during the reign of Wen and Jing Emperors of the Western Han Dynasty, Golden Years of Zhenguan, peak of Tang prosperity during Kaiyuan, and booming and golden age of the Qing dynasty. However, if the policy of the new dynasty does not allow people to rest, but extorting taxes and levies, stricting …show more content…
During the period of dynasty replacement, the previously suppressed northern nomads suddenly rose up, southward invasive the new dynasty, the new dynasty should take different strategies depending on the conditions. For example, the Western Han Dynasty, national strength is still relatively weak, the ruling is not solid, so to deal with the northern nomadic the emperor chose to compromise and made a marriage alliance. Until seventy years later, national strength was stronger, Emperor Hanwu made a massive attack on the northern nomads with a decisive victory. Emperor Taizong of Tang dynasty, first chose to compromise to the Eastern Tujue’s attack, after preparing for three years he attacked and expelled Eastern Tujue. Faced with these contradictions, if refuse to take the historical experience and taking inappropriate strategies, it will often shorten the life of the dynasty. To prevent farmers revolt, the Song dynasty strengthened autocratic centralization, maintained a large number of soldiers and officers, arose the problem of "redundant soldiers, officers and military expenditure", resulting in "poor and weak" situation. Response to the …show more content…
A new dynasty established after a peasant uprising usually learned from peasant uprising, and the mistakes from the old dynasty. Some people in the Western Han Dynasty always pay attention not to track Qin dynasty did. Emperor Taizong of Tang dynasty kept warning himself about the decline of Sui dynasty. New dynasty’s success is related to how the new dynasty rulers look at the lessons of history, and taking the right measures. Ancient China is not only an agricultural society, but also a class society. Dynasties rulers are exploiters, they pursue their own interests. They could accept the lesson from peasant war, accept the experience of a dynasty’s decline from previous one. But usually when they are powerful enough, they no longer have self-control. Autocratic centralized state bureaucracy at all levels and officials at all levels is a very important part to prevent the decline happens again. So the rulers always pay great attention on management problems. Often after dynasty raised rulers very careful straighten officialdom, like the Western Han Dynasty, Tang Dynasty, and the Ming Dynasty. The reason why a dynasty decline, a big part of that is the political
This could affect how the Tang chose leaders. The Tang favored aristocrats because they were wealthy and owned land. The third reason for the Song having a better system for choose leaders is that the song base
The Yuan dynasty also known as the Mongol dynasty, was considered a brief irrelevance in China’s long history. There are many arguments to say that the Yuan dynasty did in fact make its mark on China’s history. Whereas others argue that the Yuan dynasty was in fact, a irrelevance in China’s history that does not need to be as noted as other dynasties of greater importance. The Yuan dynasty came to pass after the Song dynasty was destroyed by the Mongols river battles and sieges against them. This was only the start of the Mongols reign and need of power.
This kept the people of China from ever considering to standing up to their ruler. Whereas the people of India were able to live more lenient lives. Until the death of the ruler Qin it remained this way. The next dynasty was The Glorious Han Dynasty. The ruler of this dynasty was of peasant origin and was not as harsh as his predecessor.
As China grew with population and technologies, so did their government. Their military was weak but they had the idea to make iron and steel weaponry. The increase of weapons allowed the Chinese military to have more power over the people. Yet, the downfall of their era was their tactics in controlling their army and the rebellious citizens. As China’s economy and population grows, so does the growth of politics and Urban life styles.
Throughout China’s long history, there have been eleven imperial dynasties that all affected China and the rest of the world in some way. However, one dynasty in particular had the most impact on both China and the world as a whole: the Song Dynasty. Part of China’s Golden Age, the Song Dynasty lasted nearly 320 years from 960-1279. The Song Dynasty helped unify China as it brought together the small states that came from the collapse of the preceding Tang Dynasty. During the Song Dynasty, China saw great technological advancement that also benefitted the entire world.
Wu Ti expanded the Chinese territory which brought peace and prospered. Their bureaucracy had many different parts and if someone died, they would’ve just plugged in someone else in their place. People who wanted to be a bureaucrat had to take the civil service exam,
The Sui and Tang dynasties took over as some of the most glorious periods in Chinese history. Rome was supplementary more disruptive than the collapse of Hna China. Due to Rome being incredibly drastic, the civilization left only the memory of the greatest in Western tradition. Another difference arises from the base of the civilizations collapsing. Rome was “human symptom” based; on the tombstones of Roman citizens were phrases suggesting the spread of downfall and defeat that provided a despondency of the afterlife (contributing to the decay of religion mentioned in the previous paragraph).
The Qin and Han Dynasties were similar in that they both believed in a strong centralized government, which strengthened and unified their empires, but they differed in that the Qin followed the strict Legalism while the Han followed the more flexible Confucianism, and the way they interacted with outsiders; the Qin tended to be more defensive of outsiders while the Han were more interactive and wanted to build relationships with foreigners. First, the Qin and Han Dynasties believed in a strong centralized government. The implementation of a strong centralized government led to the success and growth of their dynasties. The centralized government creates a pyramid of power and influence, with the main leader, the emperor, on top.
They both lasted close to 300 years each. With strong leadership and strategic land being conquered, they were able to last a long time with power. The two dynasties are responsible for valuable productions in the Asian world such as printing and the fine arts. Both dynasties took a fall after wars and disasters damaged their
Japan’s Tokugawa (or Edo) period, lasted from 1603 to 1867. This was the final era of the traditional Japanese government before the modern era. The Qin dynasty lasted from 221-206BC. Thought it was brief, it was very important in Chinese history. The main weakness of the Tokugawa was an internal crisis and Western intrusion.
During the era of classical societies, the Han and Roman empires were two vast cosmopolitan societies which dominated regions all throughout Eurasia. In regards to the fall of the Han and Roman empires, both were similar in that they fell victim to internal government decay, but different in that Rome fell to foreign invasions, while Han suffered from rebellions of their own people. The Han and Roman empires were similar in their fall in that they both suffered from internal decay, specifically of their governments. In the Han empire, land distribution problems that were originally sought to be fixed by the “Socialist emperor” Wang Mang allowed large landowners to become even more influential than they previously were.
The Han Dynasty in China and the Roman Empire shared many similarities and differences when it came to political rule and the nature of their political authority. The most significant difference between the two is how the Han dynasty enacted policies that were shaped to counter the wrongdoings of the previous Qin dynasty, whereas the Roman Empire enacted policies shaped to create and promote peace and stability. The difference in the two empire’s coming to power was to account for their variance in political rule. After the Qin dynasty, the Han ruled China for four centuries, enacting numerous political changes and governing one of the most efficacious dynasties in Chinese history.
With many rulers at one time, tension began to build and each ruler grew to feel more superior than the other. After all, they were all “Sons of God” so naturally each one wanted to be the top dog. They ruled as coordinators rather than as a central government and this type of challenging ruling started to split up the Zhou into regional states. The tension between the rulers eventually escalated into a war between all of the regions. This brutal war was known as the “Period of Warring States” which essentially led to the fall and conclusion of the Zhou dynasty.
The dynastic cycle was how the dynasties rose and fell. First the ruler gains the mandate of heaven. Then the were prosperous. Next the population rose then there was corruption famine loss of mandate population decrease the the states started warring then the victor starts the next dynasty and the cycle repeats.
An example of a dynasty is ancient China. The Chinese ruled by passing the line of rulers from father to son. After the father has passed away, the son would take over the country. The Chinese dynasty never tried to take over other regions. They were very content with the area they had and because of that their culture was persevered for years.