Claire Jackson
Olivia Lazear
Aiden Boule
1/10/2023
Civics
New Jersey v.s. T.L.O. In 1980 to 1989 there was a court case New Jersey v.s T.L.O and it was about two girls who had been smoking in the bathroom. The first girl admitted to smoking but T.L.O claimed she was not smoking. The administrator demanded to see her purse. He found a pack of cigarettes and rolling paper for cigarettes. He then found a small bag of marijuana in her purse. He also found a pipe, a stack of money, and a piece of paper with the names of students who owed T.L.O money. At the bottom of her purse he found a letter implying that she was dealing marijuana. She was then brought to the police and confessed to selling marijuana. In the years of the 1980’s an estimated 89.9 million which is 50% of U.S adults were ever smokers and 45.8% were current smokers. The amount of youth smokers decreased slightly from 1980 through 1984 and then increased through 1989, the largest annual increase occurred in 1988. The percent of teens that smoked
…show more content…
The U.S Supreme Court sided with the school, the administration of the school was accused of violating the fourth amendment. When the teacher brought them to the principal's office the principal demanded to see the contents of T.L.O’s purse. The principal was later accused of search and seizure. Based on her confession and the evidence New Jersey charged her with possession of marijuana and brought her to juvenile court. In court T.L.O argued that her Fourth Amendment rights against reasonable searches and seizures had been violated. The court sided with the school and T.L.O took her case to the New Jersey Supreme Court. Later on in the trial the court found that the search was not acceptable and the evidence could not be used. The state of New Jersey appealed the decision to the United States Supreme
On 03-21-2016, at approximately 9:25 am CSA Stewart observed Jalin D’Angelo Brown entering the search area with a grocery bag with a half of peanut butter and jelly sandwich with an unusual smell. Mr. Stewart asks Jalin Brown what was in the bag and Jalin replied, “It’s just a sandwich.” Upon a closer investigation of the sandwich, CSA Stewart realized that the sandwich was layered with an illegal substance. He took a closer look and noticed that it was “Marijuana called, “Loud,” which was over the interior of the bag. Jalin Brown was turned over to the Dean of Students (Mr. Barnes) and SRO Friday who also confirmed that the sandwich was layered with marijuana.
I have found five online news articles and four videos related to this case through various websites. These websites1 include two articles from cleveland19.com, one from cbs46.com, one from thesuburbanite.com, one from ohio.com, one from clevescene.com, one from kptv.com, one from wfsb.com, and the last news posting that I found on this case is from wtol.com. Full links can be found at the
Inside, he found cigarettes, rolling paper, a large amount of one dollar bills, a pipe, marijuana, an index card that appeared to be students that owed T.L.O. money, and two letters that applied that T.L.O. was selling marijuana in schools. T.L.O.’s mother was called by Choplick and was asked to take T.L.O. to the Police Office. She willingly did so. Because of her confessions and the evidence against her, New Jersey brought charges against her. In a local court, T.L.O. argued that her rights given by the Fourth
Therefore, her claim of refusal being protected by the Fifth Amendment was false. Ms. Hearn’s ability to perform as an educator was not questioned by administration nor the courts, which relied only on her resistance to comply with the School Board’s “Drug Free Workplace” policy. Ms. Hearn appealed to the Supreme Court, which denied hearing of her
First of all, the court needed to determine whether or not Mapp was guilty of possessing illegal pornographic material within the state boundaries of Ohio. The handling of this issue gave rise to a second cumbersome issue, which the court also needed to look into. The issue was determining whether it was right to convict a suspect based on evidence obtained using unlawful means. Notably, various judges involved in the case had their reasons for the opinions they held. For instance, Justices Black, Brennan, and Clark wanted to use the Mapp case to enable application of the exclusionary rule in all states (Dudley, 2012).
Nicole’s father, Stephen Eisel sued the school system, the superintendent, the principal and two guidance counselors at Sligo Middle School in Montgomery County. In June 1990, Judge J. James McKenna dismissed the suit ruling that the counselors and school board had no duty to intervene (McCord, 1991). The court found there was no law that stated that the counselors inform the parents. The purpose of this case was to find that the school counselors had a duty to intervene and stop a suicide from taking place that the breach of confidentiality was minimum compare to a life and death situation. The case was taken to the Court of Appeals of Maryland in 1990.
However, supporters of the case were persistent, so the case was brought back before the judge, and he agreed, seeing that there was no way they would let this go until a real trial took place. While in court, several witnesses were interrogated for the case of the young man, including middle school principal Mary Podlesny, high school principals William Davis and Tom Blauert, one of the main tormentors Roy Grande, and Nabozny himself. Most of the witnesses supported the young man’s case by explaining the relentless bullying and how nobody took action. However, Mrs. Podlesny still denied having any knowledge of the bullying, which was a very stupid move since both Roy Grande and his mother recalled her being present at a meeting about the situation at Ashland Middle School. When Roy was brought from prison to be questioned, he was truthful about everything he did to make Nabozny’s time at school miserable.
The scapegoats of this trial were Ray Buckey, and several teachers at the preschool. Ray Buckey did have power, as the owner of the school, but he was accused of molesting a child, which then influenced every other parent's opinion on him. As people started to become suspicious of Buckey, the police took action; "the police conducted searches of Buckey's home, confiscating such 'evidence' as a rubber duck, a graduation robe, and Playboy magazines. Detective Hoag arrested Buckey on September 7, 1983. (Linder 1)
March 7, 1980, in Piscataway High School two freshman girls were caught smoking cigarettes in their school’s bathroom. A teacher had found the girls and escorted them to the principal’s office, where they had met with Assistant Vice Principal Theodore Choplick. One of the girls immediately confessed to smoking cigarettes in the bathroom while her companion denied smoking the cigarettes or ever smoking at all. The companion, known as T.L.O. (Tracy Lois Odem) was suspected of lying. Based on the other girl 's confession, the assistant vice principal brought T.L.O. into his office where he demanded to see her purse.
The case was appealed and taken to the Supreme Court on April 21, 2009. The Supreme court ruled the strip search a violation of Redding’s Fourth Amendment rights. Everything that they had done before the strip search was legal and constitutional, but once they performed a strip search, they did not have substantial evidence that Savana Redding was hiding drugs in her underwear(Safford Unified School District).
The case was appealed and taken to the Supreme Court on April 21, 2009. The Supreme court ruled the strip search a violation of Redding’s Fourth Amendment rights. Everything that they had done before the strip search was legal and constitutional, but once they performed a strip search, they did not have substantial evidence that Savana Redding was hiding drugs in her underwear(Safford Unified School District).
if it was held at school of course they would be expelled. After listening to the case i believe that the court made a good
After nearly all the boys completed their prison sentences, the case was overturned. The boys never did anything to the woman running through Central Park. The
In Oklahoma, two students (Daniel James and Lindsey Earls) took legal action in stating their opions about the drug testing in schools. The drug testing students was created by the Tecumseh, Oklahoma School District which requires all middle, as well as high school students to participate in urinalysis testing for drugs in order to participate in any extracurricular school activity. This case applies to the Acton’s case because both Acton, Earl, and James all disagreed upon the act of drug testing students. For whatever apparent reason, James Acton’s parents refused to allow James be drug tested. Why?
Keisha was accused by a white student that she had stolen her $11. Keisha was taken to principal office and was stripped searched for money and no money was found from her. Her mother, Mabline Quince registered a case against the school because her daughter was mentally harassed and physically tortured because she was wrongfully connected to stealing. This incident lead to mental embarrassment ,humiliation and cause damage to her reputation(Jet. Vol 90.