Both Nazi and Soviet regimes shared an underlying devotion to creating a new higher human type. The two nations supported ambitious ideas to rebirth and perfect their ideal citizens based on their view of the perfect human. Although the Soviet Union system was based on nothing less than the liberation of humanity, the Nazis sought to create an ultimate master race in the final goal to organize a completely new racial order in Europe. This essay explores ideals in Stalinist Russia and Nazi Germany of their vision as the new human type.
In both the Soviet Union and Germany, idealistic aspirations focused on their comportment, toward a new beginning for society and transformation of the individual citizen into a new man or woman. The new man ideals
Critically Analyze an Excerpt from Main Kampf (Volume 1, Chapter 11) by Adolph Hitler In (Volume 1, Chapter 11) of Main Kampf, Adolf Hitler discusses “Nation and Race” in attempts to distinguish the Aryan race from the inferior race, the Jewish. He presents his claim by using anti-Semitic imagery, which is a form of discrimination against Jewish people (anti-Semitic, 2016). He also uses propaganda to convince the masses to follow his sophism. This paper will review (Volume 1, Chapter 11) titled “Nation and Race”, and will evaluate the persuasive techniques used by Adolf Hitler while applying rhetorical analysis.
This essay will discuss the impact of pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation by the nazi germany during the period 1933 to 1946. And the Jews were affected, During the period of 1933 to 1946 in Germany it was the rise of the Nazi party and the implementation of policies that were based on pseudoscientific ideas of race. The Nazi regime believed that the superiority of the Aryan race and fought to eliminate those they saw as inferior, including the Jewish people. This led to the persecution and murder of millions of Jews during the Holocaust. The impact of the pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation was bad and harsh.
During this time Nazi Jewish policy was part of a larger plan that aimed to reconstruct racialism in Europe. This operation was just a code name for the Nazi’s invasion of the Soviet Union. In searching for answers to the question on when and why did the Nazis decide to commit genocide, the war against the Soviet Union had become a huge importance because the murdering of the Jews there has become a watershed in
Hayes looks at how the Nazi regime's attitude of Jews changed over time, moving from persecution and exclusion to ghettoization and eventually extermination. He points out that the choice to pursue total destruction was the outcome of a complicated interaction of forces rather than being premeditated. Also, Hayes examines Nazi ideology, particularly its anti-Semitic viewpoints, and how they acted as a catalyst for the determination to exterminate European Jews. He contends that this worldview gave Nazis the framework they needed to view Jews as a menace below human status that needed to be eliminated. Next, the chapter dives into the impact of Nazi bureaucracy.
One’s moral values could be another’s worst nightmare. The Nazis didn’t think that the Jews were worthy of living and viewed them as not human. Therefore they didn’t deserve to be treated as humans. There were many example of how The Nazi’s morals alienated the Jews. The Jew’s experience alienation in the ghettos, during transportation and especially in the concentration camps.
Introduction Joseph Stalin is perhaps one of the most important and discussed people in Russian history. He was arguably a feared tyrant cursed and despised by many. At the same time, one finds sufficient evidence for the adoration and worship of Stalin that used to exist in the minds of the citizens of the Soviet Union. One reason for this worship was the existence of the so called ‘Cult of Personality’ where Stalin was celebrated as a wise leader, father of all people, and the architect of victory of the Second World War. In his book, The Stalin Cult: A Study in the Alchemy of Power, Jan Plamper states that Stalin’s cult of personality was largely a visual phenomenon.
He clearly outlines the model platforms for the revolutionaries and their designs for a racially defined utopia. By applying this model to several revolutionary movements in Europe and throughout the world, Weitz legitimises his highlighting of the synthesis between warfare or violence and racial thinking being necessary for the execution of a genocide. A synthesis that could only occur in the 20th
Post WWl, Russia was still not industrialized, suffering economically and politically and in no doubt in need of a leader after Lenin’s death. “His successor, Joseph Stalin, a ruthless dictator, seized power and turned Russia into a totalitarian state where the government controls all aspects of private and public life.” Stalin showed these traits by using methods of enforcement, state control of individuals and state control of society. The journey of Stalin begins now.
The Holocaust is a shining example of Anti-Semitism at its best and it was no secret that the Nazis tried to wipe out the Jews from Europe but the question is why did the Nazis persecute the Jews and how did they try to do it. This essay will show how the momentum, from a negative idea about a group of people to a genocide resulting in the murder of 6 million Jews, is carried from the beginning of the 19th Century, with pseudo-scientific racial theories, throught the 20th century in the forms of applied social darwinism and eugenics(the display of the T4 programme), Nazi ideas regarding the Jews and how discrimination increased in the form of the Nuremberg Laws , Kristallnacht, and last but not least, The Final Solution. Spanning throughout the 19th century, racial theories were seen. Pseudo-Scientific theories such as Craniometry,where the size of one’s skull determines one’s characteristics or could justifies one’s race( this theory was used first by Peter Camper and then Samuel Morton), Karl Vogt’s theory of the Negro race being related to apes and of how Caucasian race is a separate species to the Negro race, Arthur de Gobineau’s theory of how miscegenation(mixing or interbreeding of different races) would lead to the fall of civilisation.
In the light of the aforementioned characteristics of totalitarianism defined, Hannah Arendt claims that totalitarianism is incomprehensible since it is not possible to judge or predict its actions through any traditional, legal, moral or common sense (Arendt, 1953 : 303). Therefore, Arendt evaluates the regimes under Hitler and Stalin rule “not only wicked but also senseless, of a kind that could not be deduced from humanly comprehensible motives” (Canovan, 1999 : 25). Arendt aims to offer an intellectual constraints for the analysis of Hitler’s
In Document K, Joseph V. Stalin preached for Industrialization within Russia, followed by the overthrow of capitalism, in order to succeed as a country. While Russia included an authoritarian government, Stalin still believed in the importance of social democracy as stated, “Do you want our socialist fatherland to be beaten and to lose its independence?”. (Stalin) In this scenario, ideas of fascism prevailed, but so did aspects of independence as seen in democracies. On the contrary, the need for political power and solutions for issues within Germany contracted with the rise of fascism, with the leadership of Hitler.
Process of Findings The first part of this report will discuss the evidence pertaining to the “genuinely concerned, pragmatic” side to Joseph Stalin’s leadership. Stalin was a leader who was honoured and praised by many of his people in the USSR for various reasons. He was portrayed on propaganda posters as a kind, caring and genuinely concerned leader particularly towards children who were the future of the USSR (Source A). By Stalin being portrayed as a leader who shows genuine concern and care for the children of his country, it propagates the message that children and the entire population of the USSR will have an “enlightened future” under his leadership13 (Source A), and would in turn help Stalin gain more support for himself.
This philosophy dictates that everyone in a society are equal and that all aspects of life are controlled by the state (Waugh, 2001). Unlike his counterpart, Hitler practiced Nazism during his tenure as Nazi Germany’s totalitarian (Waugh, 2001). Nazism asserts that everyone has unconditionally pledged their loyalty to the ‘Führer’ and that the Aryan race was superior to all other races (Waugh, 2001). Such contrasting beliefs would eventually play an integral role in discerning both men. Both tyrants were also segregated by their dissimilar
The Third Reich, referring to Hitler’s reign and Germany being under Nazi rule between the years 1933-1945, is often referred to as a totalitarian state. A totalitarian state is a system of government in which all power is centralized and does not allow any rival authorities, and the state controls every corner of individual lives with absolute power. Nazi Germany has been referred to as an excellent example of this type of government. This essay will analyse five aspects of Nazi Germany to determine whether it truly exhibited the totalitarian style of government.
Analyzing Hoss’ childhood to his time in prison is very important because it shows how Hoss was shaped into obeying orders from higher authority and how he developed a sense of duty and devotion to protecting Germany. Hannah Arendt, the author of Origins of Totalitarianism, explains that National Socialism was a totalitarian ideology that built itself on the idea that higher authority from Himmler and Hitler was never to be judged whether they were right or wrong because by following these orders