ipl-logo

Niccoolo Machiavelli's The Prince Analysis

847 Words4 Pages

Niccoolo Machiavelli is an Italian writer born in 1469 and one of the most influencing writers in the history of politics. Machiavelli finished writing his famous book “The Prince” in 1514, however, the book was published in 1532 after his death. Machiavelli wrote the prince as a guide for rulers to maintain and escalate their power, therefore, he was realistic and down to earth and instead of using ideal republics he spoke the truth of the human nature and how to survive the obstacles in order to become a great “prince”. Some people claim that Machiavelli is the devil and his book is evil full of fear and hatred, however, I firmly believe that Machiavelli’s theories are wisely balanced as he did not turn a blind eye on the importance of being …show more content…

For example, Adolf Hitler, he was a pure Machiavellian as he followed every principles Machiavelli wrote; he convinced the Germans that he is killing the the Jews people because they were their enemy, moreover, he was feared and respected by the Germans and that helped him maintain his power for a long time, as he always followed “the end justifies the means” theory in every decision he made. Moreover, Obama and Clinton both were the presidents of America and they both can relate, as they gave the appearance of being nice and good in front of the people to gain their love and trust and had their henchmen do the “dirty work” for them. Furthermore, Tony Blair who was the prime minister of the United Kingdom and the leader of the labor party, he followed the prince’s footsteps, according to Machiavelli’s theories he was a lucky prince; as he had an opportunity to have power (the death of john smith) and he grabbed that opportunity and gained the position, moreover he changed the system to be the only one who controls all the decisions, Blair was a classic Machiavellian consequently, he succeeded in reaching what he wanted. On the other hand, Neil Kinnock was another labor party politician he was absolutely loved by the people however, he was never elected, and that supports Machiavelli’s theory based on the human nature and how they evaluate the prince “it is safer to be feared than loved” (Machiavelli,

Show More
Related

  • Comparing The Qualities Of The Prince And Letter From Birmingham Jail

    910 Words  | 4 Pages

    President Obama echo a leadership of both Niccolo Machiavelli "The Qualities of the Prince" and Martin Luther King Jr. "Letter from Birmingham Jail". Machiavelli point of view to become a successful prince was that you must lead your people. He talks about how a prince should appear to his people for authority. There are different types of principles such as war and is it better to be loved or feared.

    Read More

  • Niccole Machiavelli's The Prince

    1824 Words  | 8 Pages

    A president comes to mind Harry S Truman, while he was viewed as someone who is confident, bold, a leader. His decision making for his people really resembles Machiavelli, especially when he gave the green light to bomb the japanese with the newly invented atomic bomb. Once he made a decision, he forgot about it and went on to bomb then again in the city of Nagasaki. Moreover, he knew presidency wasn 't an easy job so there was a saying he stuck by which is as blunt as Machiavelli 's The Prince, "If you can 't stand the heat, stay out of the

    Read More

  • The Prince Rhetorical Analysis

    676 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Niccolo Machiavelli's book, The Prince (1513), he evaluates on how a prince can be a successful leader. Machiavelli’s purpose of this guidebook was to construct his argument to the rising ruler Giuliano de Medici for when he comes to power in Florence. He adopts a casual but authoritative tone in order to convince the prince that Machiavelli’s evaluation on how to be the best prince, is the right thing for the prince to do without coming off as he knows more than the prince or is trying to intimidate him.. Machiavelli’s reference to previous rulers and whether their tactics failed or succeeded helps to benefit his credibility along with his allusion to historic text. He appeals to our logic by simply stating a prince can only do what is within his power to control, and his use of an analogy furthers his argument.

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson And Niccolo Machiavelli's The Morals Of The Prince

    762 Words  | 4 Pages

    Machiavelli argues the perfect prince will be both feared and loved by his people, and if unable to be both he will make himself feared and not hated. Machiavelli believes it is much safer to be feared than to be loved because people are less likely to offend and stand up against strong characters, also people are less concerned in offending a prince who has made himself loved. Accordingly, Machiavelli believes generosity is harmful to your reputation and the choice between being generous or stingy, merciful or cruel, honest or deceitful, should only be important if it aids the prince in political power. All in all, Machiavelli believes the ruler must be a great deceiver and do what is essential to uphold power over the

    Read More

  • Machiavelli The Prince Rhetorical Devices

    674 Words  | 3 Pages

    Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513, a time when Italy as a whole had yet to be formed; the Italian subcontinent consisted only of loosely connected groups of independent city states with a constantly evolving political battleground. Thus Machiavelli wrote The Prince to convey his idea of a strong, active, and in his own eyes, perfect ruler to the current ruling family, the Medici, as he wished to impress them and become an eventual political attaché for the family. Machiavelli argues that when given a choice it is better to be feared than loved, and bases the majority of his rhetorical argument on logical cause and effect conclusions that are exemplified through his use of anecdotes, and analogy. The excerpt begins at chapter fifteen with Machiavelli stating that he writes the prince in order to “make something useful for whoever understands it” (Machiavelli ch.15), and he expounds upon this simple purpose by devising clear and logical solutions to many of the problems that a ruler may face.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli The Prince Summary Chapter 4

    612 Words  | 3 Pages

    In chapter one, Machiavelli talks about republics and principalities. Principalities are either hereditary or are new. In chapter two, he mentions how principalities are to be ruled and preserved. It is easier to maintain new principalities because a prince who becomes a prince through family history would rule like his family did in the past. The hereditary prince has easier time gaining the love of his subjects than a new prince because the people already know how his family has ruled in the past.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Machiavelli's The Prince

    707 Words  | 3 Pages

    “Although one should not reason about Moses, as he was a mere executor of things that had been ordered for him by God, nonetheless he should be admired if only for that grace which made him so deserving of speaking with God” (22). In the context of The Prince, this statement proves to be duplicitous because Machiavelli claims that he will not reason about Moses, but then uses the following pages to do precisely that. Furthermore, Machiavelli draws extensively from the actions of Moses and the Old Testament God, although Machiavelli is often regarded as an antagonist of the Church. Machiavelli’s handbook for princes consists of concrete advice for rulers that directly reflect the more abstracted stories in Exodus. For instance, Machiavelli’s description of human nature in The Prince mirrors Moses’ experiences as the leader of the Israelites in Exodus.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli Vs Hobbes Analysis

    1081 Words  | 5 Pages

    Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes both recognized during their lives that they lived in an imperfect world and had similar ideas about how to prevent their society from becoming disarray. Both great thinkers agree that men need a power structure in place, so that men 's ambition do not become too great and plunge society into chaos. Machiavelli 's The Prince approaches this issue from a practical worldview, as Machiavelli was a seasoned politician in the city-state of Florence and authored his work so rulers can retain their power in society. He uses his personal experiences in politics in order to convey that people are flawed in their thinking and "for many have pictured republics and principalities which in fact have never been known or seen, because how one lives is so far distant from how one ought to live" (Machiavelli 406). A single man thinks that he knows what is best for society, but in reality, has a warped and selfish perception of the world.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli's Use Of Lying And Deception In Politics

    954 Words  | 4 Pages

    One aspect of Machiavelli’s theory which significantly contributes to his reputation as the “philosopher of evil,” is his advice to the prince on keeping their word to the public. In chapter eighteen, Machiavelli states, “a wise ruler cannot, and should not, keep his word when doing so is to his disadvantage, and when the reasons that led him to promise to do so no longer apply” (pg. 37). To simplify, Machiavelli says princes are obligated to lie in certain circumstances. He also states that while it is unnecessary for the prince to have positive qualities, such as honesty, trustworthiness, sympathy, compassion, or be religious, it is essential for the prince to be viewed so by the public (pg. 37). While many people argue that Machiavelli’s legitimization of lying and deception in politics is immoral, I argue the opposite.

    Read More

  • Erasmus Vs Machiavelli

    1034 Words  | 5 Pages

    Machiavelli has the most correct ideas on both controlling the people as a ruler and on being remembered as a great one. These two viewpoints had great influence during their time and for centuries to come, both with modern ideas and correct ideas even though they had a lot of contrast. Machiavelli’s The Prince may be thought of the more recognizable of the two in the present, but people in the present day have many of the same ideas that

    Read More

  • Machiavelli's The Prince

    648 Words  | 3 Pages

    The book The Prince by Machiavelli is a depiction of the renaissance because Machiavelli describes the different kinds of states, a prince can rest on the favor of the people if he has shown certain qualities of leadership and courage towards the people and the prince needs to treat nobles differently according to how they are inclined towards him. Machiavelli uses these rules to show how a prince should conduct his actions in the renaissance time period. A prince needs to know these rules to correctly oversight his kingdom/state precisely and efficiently. According to The Prince, the states are either ruled by a prince or a republic these states are known as, principalities.

    Read More

  • The Failure Of Leadership In Machiavelli's The Prince

    981 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Prince, written by Machiavelli, is a candid outline of how he believes leaders gain and keep power. Machiavelli uses examples of past leaders to determine traits that are necessary to rule successfully. Leaders such as the King of Naples and the Duke of Milan lacked military power, made their subjects hate them, or did not know how to protect themselves from the elite, causing them to lose power. He says that these rulers should blame laziness, not luck, for their failures. By looking at these historical successes and failures, Machiavelli is able to develop his own thoughts on how politics and leaders should be in the future.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Machiavelli's Ideal Prince

    930 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to Machiavelli, ideal prince is a risk-taker who puts a military on action, as the people respect the warrior. An ideal prince thinks for himself rather than relying on others, knows how to read characters, and does not surround himself with flatterers. He lives in reality, not fantasy. He works hard, utilizes his own mind, and makes survival of his guide. The ideal leader is neither loved nor hated, but respected.

    Read More

  • The Principles Of Leadership In The Prince By Machiavelli

    1238 Words  | 5 Pages

    Probably one of the most infamous and controversial ideologies of the 16th century, the prince by Machiavelli has been a reference for many great leaders and academicians since it was published. The book provides historically tested and proven principles of leadership. The prince has been described as a manual for those who want to win and retain power. While some may argue that leadership is an inherent trait in human, leaders are made, not born. Making a great leader out of a person is not just a matter of identifying the leadership traits, skill and talents of the individual, but harnessing the traits, develop them and eventually mastering how to be leader.

    Read More

  • Machiavelli: The Characteristics Of Being A Good Prince

    1526 Words  | 7 Pages

    This is a work that still influences us today and is still relevant in today’s complex society. Some of the most prominent leaders of the 20th century have been influenced by Machiavellian ideas. U.S Presidents like Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton and U.K Prime Minister Anthony Blair are called Machiavellian leaders today. According to Machiavelli a prince must focus all his serious time and energy to war and how to wage it (Machiavelli, 31).

    Read More

More about Niccoolo Machiavelli's The Prince Analysis

Open Document