On July 29th, 2011, Bobby Dean Nickel was fired from his job at a Staples in Los Angeles, CA. The events leading up to that fateful day in his life have been documented in the court case Nickel vs. Staples Inc. In 2008 Staples Contract and Staples Inc. acquired Corporate Express, the company Mr. Nickel had worked for since August 2002. Corporate Express paid their employees more than Staples did, so after Staples bought Corporate Express, Mr. Nickel’s felt like his managers had it out for the older higher paid employees (him being one of them). In Nickel’s complaint, he stated how he was often the butt of jokes during staff meetings with such sayings as “old goat” and “old coot.” One of Bobby’s managers had requested for his resignation, and …show more content…
The article is short and sweet and just states the highlights of what happened to Bobby Nickel, but also includes a sentence the other sources do not grasp onto. “Mark Cautela, a spokesman for Staples, said the company disagreed with the jury’s verdict and that it will continue to pursue the case through the courts.” (4) Zachary’s article was nearly the exact same article as the others, with the previous quote being the exception. It doesn’t really hinder, but the fact it is so close to the others, it stirs questions on whether it created solely for his viewers or for all readers. Whether the answer is the former or the latter, he does portray a sense of trying to add insight into the situation to possibly help those that could be going through the same thing. Assumptions on his part are not clear, but could possibly withheld from the audience. Stereotypes were not used, it is a pure plan as day article piece. Cultural myths were also not prevalent through the piece. The Nickel vs. Staples Inc. case was a big court case that displayed how age discrimination is a big deal, and should be treated as such. Businesses may find reasons to fire their older employees, but if the only people they are getting rid of just happen to be of the older variety, it ends up being considered age discrimination in every sense of the word. Although the jury of the Nickel vs. Staples Inc. ruled in favor of the plaintiff on an age discrimination case, age discrimination is still prevalent in our corporate culture. Who actually wins in cases like this, corporations or those discriminate
In the similar case of NLRB v. Jasper Seating Co., the President of the company stated the termination for Thompson
Yesterday, Sloan Jackson, age 18 was put on trial for stealing a shirt from Famous Fashions in Merchandise Mall. He supposedly ran out of the store with a lump (which was the same color as the stolen shirt) in his jacket to go to Record Mart because there was a big sale going on. He then was found sitting next to the yogurt stand and the shirt was found in a trash barrel near the yogurt stand. He then ran away from the security guard but he was in the end caught and brought back to the store to return the shirt. At the trial yesterday the jury came to a verdict of being guilty after talking in the jury room for about 10 minutes.
The article I read is about a 9-year-old girl named Hilde Lysiak. This little girl has written books inspired from her experiences as a young journalist in her hometown; Selinsgrove, Pennsylvania. “Hilde Cracks the Case” is the title of one of her series which have been published. In April 2016, she broke a story on a homicide near her house. After asking the police for permission, she interviewed some neighbors and posted her article before any other newspapers could.
Plaintiffs: Newark Fire Department employee Lomack, along with 33 other Firefighters, the Newark Firefighters Union and the Newark Fire Officers Union. Defendant: City of Newark. The Legal Issue:
How would you feel if you were falsely accused of a terrible crime? That’s right, Ozie Powell and the Scottsboro Boys were accused of rape and sent to jail for many years, a crime of which they didn't even commit. In the case of Scottsboro, Ozie Powell was clearly innocent of rape. Ozie wasn’t on the same car as the woman who accused the boys of raping them, and Ozie didn't even know the other men on the train until the day of the accusations. The woman who accused the boys of the crime were prostitutes, and had had intercourse only a little while before entering the train, explaining why the sperm found in their system was dead.
The United States Supreme Court reversed the order from the Arkansas Supreme Court, finding in favor of the magazine. The court felt that the government was discriminating against Arkansas Times based upon their content, which goes against the First Amendment. “It took longer than we thought but it was all worth it in the long run. The court did the right thing in the end and hopefully our case can help another newspaper or magazine that feels discriminated against,” Hanson told us after hearing the final
Rather instead he insists that if they are going to be outraged by a presidential pardoning they should direct their attention to the concurrent pardoning of Oscar Lopez Rivera. In his article, Lane first starts out by explaining what a presidential pardon is and how they usually work, then he starts to point out the glaring differences in the two cases. Lanes article is more persuasive because he mainly focuses on and
In the article that Derek Hawkins wrote for the Washington post's Morning Mix, he wrote about an event that happened in Utah. What happened was a nurse got arrested because she would not let the police draw blood from an unconscious suspect. Hawkins states all of the facts and nothing more throughout his writing. Even though he does not make an argument or state his opinion in his writing, he does make a hint of his opinion through his title, “ ‘This is crazy’ sobs Utah hospital nurse as cop roughs her up, arrests her for doing her job.” He set up the reader on the side of the nurse before the reader even knows what happens.
This article it states the number of innocent people who have been killed by the system due to the laws similarity written like prop 66. They also have three reasons why proposition 66 will be bad and they have a story of a man who was wrongly convicted and killed. This website is credible because this is a campaign with more than five organizations who fund and support them. It helps me on paper because I also need to look at the opposing sides reasons in why they think it 's bad in which theirs was that they are afraid that innocent people would get killed. But now I have to look for evidence to prove them wrong and to bring insight that wrong convictions will not happen due to the thorough
Society plays a huge role in helping us believe what is thought to be right vs wrong or good vs bad. The author, Brent Staples, writes in his article, “Just Walk on By,” gives an insight of what society is really like. Staples shows how much the U.S. has changed and what has stayed the same. Staples does this by appealing to emotions and using ethos as a way to connect to the audience. The author uses this to explain his message which is that he believes that society affects the way we see people and makes many people immediately assume that someone is a particular thing based on how their appearance.
Discrimination, according to the textbook, is the unequal treatment of various categories of people. (Macionis pg.86) In the movie, when the younger generation and some of the older generation start to turn to color from black and white, the townspeople get angry and can’t accept the change. As a result, they start to hang up signs in the stores saying
The actions of Stephen Glass, a once respected reporter for the New Republic, that made him famous, were also the things that shattered his career. It not only made everyone at the New Republic not trust him, but also the readers who believed his stories. His actions were dishonest, and he knew he was spinning false tales, but wanted to become famous, by manipulating his readers and his coworkers. First off, this young writer had no boundaries when it came to storytelling. Glass would lie about dates, times, names, meetings, etc., all to make a story that would pass the editing process.
Additionally, the media got into the investigation by asking questions about the events before the murder. The National Enquirer, for instance, took a different angle to investigate the case; however, by doing this, the media almost made it impossible for proper investigations to be held by the criminal justice system. Ogletree Jr. maintains that the press failed terribly by trying to assume what the lawyers or witnesses thought at different times of the trial, which was a fail (Ogletree). Consequently, there should be a level of protection from the media. Public figures should not have their cases aired or followed to prevent tampering of evidence or misconceptions.
A similar case was the case of McMahon v. Bunn Matic Corporation when a similar claim that the coffee was too hot seeing as it was 179 fahrenheit and could of done serious harm to someone if an accident would of occured. What is showed about the court and its members is that they were quick to side with Liebeck and offered her a lot more than even she wanted. The impact I think it has on society is that people are more leaning to sympathize to another rather than they are on corporations seeing as corporations only really see them as numbers on a
First is the topic of on the bias of ageism itself. Especially in the area of hiring, the bias against older aged people tends to be strong. The perception is that older people have less energy and may be unable to do a more stressful, demanding job. When Ben is first brought into the company, several employees assume several negative stereotypes. An example includes when Becky constantly made complaints about Ben’s lack of hearing, implying that this must be the result of old age.