Therefore, the conventional interpretation of this encounter that simply presents Nicodemus as a genuine seeker but not understanding Jesus’ words is eclipsed by a more complicated but realistic characterization of dissembling. The latter is caricatured by the ensuing bewildering conversation that does not only manifest the profound identity of Jesus as genuinely coming from God but unveils the true identity of his faking adversary. Such revisit of Nicodemus character is better understood not only with ancient rhetoric but also by contemporary adage, and a cunningly human sense, of “keeping your friends close, and enemies closer.” The ingenuity of such literary style surely infuses excitement in the reading of the story as the audience keeps on guessing how the event will unfold by keeping a keen eye on the movements of the characters. But more importantly, the story teller drives home the message with no less than dramatic twists and turns before dropping a bombshell conclusion. In the case of this episode in the 3rd chapter of the gospel of John, it becomes suddenly clear that the point of the entire conversation is not so much the …show more content…
As we aware that history of salvation never ceases running but continuously flows through generations. The article and the commentaries help me to be aware of the high and depth of every message contains in the Bible. The motivation and background of the writing is also of equal importance in shaping its concepts. Moreover, I realize that there is always room for different interpretations or ways of perceiving the message behind the writing because we cannot absolutely assure in one way or another the original idea of the authors. Thus, we have to be opened in judging and evaluating the message of any text; and need to put in mind that our personal interpretation of the biblical message for personal interest is advisedly
Hence the Patient will be thrown into eternal damnation. One of narrative’s purposes for the reader is to assist them in discerning the tale’s warning to the Christian community. The book cautions against the attitudes of complacency that exist in the community of faith and real
He comes to terms at the end, saying that “sin was what you took and didn’t give back.” This literary work is told through the use of several rhetorical devices, including imagery, symbolism, and
God is the creator of all and the reason for our salvation as humans. The intent of this research paper is to discuss the similarities and differences between the religious principle views of salvation of Roman Catholic versus Southern Baptist. Roman Catholics
But it is just an act as the sharp reader quickly figures out. He uses a number of rhetorical devices to stir the ire of the crowd, but they are forms of trickery and also meant to appeal to the Romans’ emotions, which at this moment are running high. He relies on pathos, more than logos or ethos to persuade his listeners. He is conniving and manipulative. He reminds me of a real great attorney.
At last, the book will recommend we discover approaches to meet the Biblical story with the social account (240-242). He grounds his examination on four scriptural tenets: the incarnation, general disclosure, basic effortlessness, and the imago Dei
Pontius especially is perplexed about if others identify him as being evil because he is cast as Pontius Pilate, the “villain” of the passion, year after year. In some of the parts he even plays the role of Satan in the Garden of Eden scene with Mary 1. Pontius’s struggle raises the question for the audience of whether or not people’s perception of us influence how we actually view ourselves. Do we need the validation from a second party to confirm our personal identity? In Part three, Pontius’s actions are especially influenced by how he feels others view him.
This shows that John is a merciful being and desires forgiveness from his wife and God, therefore demonstrating traits of a good man. Furthermore, John has a heated argument with his wife, due to his encounter with Abigail, alone. Although, he thinks his wife will doubt him, she states on the contrary, “I do not judge you. The magistrate sits in your heart that judges you. I never thought you but a good man, John - only somewhat bewildered” (55).
The author Ronald Youngblood observed the preface of the Old Treatment in the book, The Heart of the Old Testament by demonstrating the basic outline of the Scriptures is to trace the development of certain key ideas from one end of the Bible to the other. This book serves a great purpose that lays out nine themes that constitute the heart of the Old Testament. The nine themes are monotheism, sovereignty, election, covenant, theocracy, law, sacrifice, faith, and redemption. Dr. Ron Youngblood has achieved his purpose in an admirable layout before us the heart of the Old Testament in a careful and practical manner. Dr. Youngblood links the key theological strands of the Old Testament to the New in a style that is biblically sound, highly readable,
The doctrine of Christ’s incarnation asserts God coming in the human flesh in the person of Jesus Christ without ceasing to be God. Sinless He lived and died on the cross for the salvation of the flesh He assumed. Thus, this paper will attempt to investigate the doctrine and its significance in the salvation of the world. The term incarnation
In the Holy Christian Bible, reads a quote from Jesus Christ in the Gospel of John, chapter 14 verse 6 that says, “Jesus said, ‘I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” I have read this verse and been told this verse over and over ever since I was introduced to Christianity when I was younger. Overtime, I have determined that this biblical verse meant that their is no other way to achieve salvation, heaven, and the ultimate truth and relationship other than accepting Jesus Christ as one’s savior and following Him. This verse also suggests the fact that other people that believe in other religions cannot be saved from God, unless they turn from their “false idols” and turn their heads to the true,
While the other gospels emphasize the Kingdom of God and the Kingdom of Heaven, John instead emphasizes new life found in Jesus. It’s from John that we get Christ’s famous claim “I am the way the truth and the life. No one comes to the father except through me” -John 14:6. Jesus frequently uses metaphors to hint at his identity. John records more of these analogies than any other gospel, giving us some of the most famous word pictures for Christ.
To conclude, the Gospel of John is a refined version of the story of Jesus Christ who takes the role of the son of God to the next level compared to the Gospel of
Who is Matthew and what is his relationship to the audience? How can we connect to the text? What was happening in these biblical times that warranted a response? We will examine Matthew’s audience, the events surrounding the text, and its meaning for us today.
It should be noted that the paper will be narrowed to the Catholic Church’s position on baptism. The terms Church and Catholic will be used interchangeably. Lastly there would be a synthesis with regards to the outlined importance of Christian baptism in John 3. The encounter between Jesus and Nicodemus and its interpretations
The Gospel of John is regularly identified as an example of this version of Christology. It is implied in John that Jesus had existed previous to His incarnation. Herrick (2004) agrees that Jesus himself suggests his pre-existence in a number of examples, such as as he had glory with the Father before the world was (John 17:5) and that he had come from the father (John 5:43; 6:38). It indicates that Jesus is the Messiah; Jesus is the pre existent Logos made flesh, the one sent by God to save.