In his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle says that “the excellent person is related to [their] friend in the same way as he is related to [themselves], since a friend is another [themselves]” (1170b). It must initially be established that Aristotle thinks only virtuous people can have true friendship because “bad people find no enjoyment in one another if they get no benefit” (1157a). A truly excellent friendship between excellent people is “immune to slander” because both friends know each other deeply and fully trust one another. Healthy friendships among virtuous people are also balanced: both individuals understand each other’s needs. The relationship is harmonious because the happiness of one is inextricably linked to the other. Aristotle …show more content…
He later describes several other possible characterizations of friends and says a friend is “one who spends time with [their] friend, and makes the same choices; or one who shares [their] friend’s distress and enjoyment” (1166a). Aristotle believes that “each of these features is found in the decent person’s relation to [themselves], and it is found in other people, insofar as they suppose they are decent” (1166a). Within these parameters, a virtuous person treats themselves as a friend. This individual desires “goods and apparent goods to [themselves], and achieves them in [their] actions, since it is proper to the good person to reach the good by [their] efforts” (1166a). They not only want the good, but they also realize that they must work to find this good. Similarly, a good friend goes out of their way to bring good things to their friend; simple words or thoughts do not make a good friend. An individual does good things for themselves or equivalently “for the sake of [their] thinking part” (1166a). This means that an excellent person does what is healthy or beneficial because of internal factors, not superficial or external ones. A good friendship has these attributes; a friend wishes well for their friend because of their own …show more content…
A person knows most of all what pleases and distresses them. Of course, they also experience these things on the personal level; only an individual directly feels what happens to them. However, it cannot be said that all humans are in concord with themselves in this respect. Non-virtuous or “base” people may “appear to have these features,” but they “are at odds with themselves, and have an appetite for one thing and a wish for another” (1166b). They may give into their harmful desires and choose to do actions that cause them harm. The virtuous person, on the contrary, is of one mind. Base people may experience distresses and pleasures, yet they cannot distinguish between self-destructive actions and good actions. On the other hand, the virtuous person understands the deeper reasons why something is pleasurable or distressful. Hence, it can be said that only the virtuous person truly “shares distresses and pleasures” with themselves. Returning to the scope of interpersonal relationships, it is clear that the good person empathizes with their closest friends more than any other individual. Friends most certainly “share distresses and
As Phineas keeps a positive outlook, so too should good friends. It has been said that people are influenced by the friends they spend the most time with, making an optimist a great person to
Seth Andrews Dr. Daniel Cistro ENGL 1102 03/10/2023 The Separation of Selfishness The great philosopher Aristotle provided an exciting take in his famous work “Nicomachean Ethics” in chapter VIII of the ninth book; where he divides selfishness into two spheres; one representing noble selfishness shown by one who seeks virtue, honor, and good works, and the other representing the simple "vulgar" selfishness shown by one who chases after worldly things. Everyone falls into one of these spheres; what separates the two is that the good man can reason with others while the simple man is too engulfed with his own passions to acknowledge anyone else. The noble character is the most selfish of them all, but he enriches his community
In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, Book ll, he explains that virtue is a habit of right action, formed by acting rightly (Nicomachean Ethics, p. 71). What he means by this is that everyone has the chance to act virtuously, but we must for work at doing what is right. Aristotle thought we should be virtuous because if we live virtuously than we will have a better life over
What is a friend? A common response to this question seems to be someone who accepts another for who they are. Another less used response to the same question is someone who leave another better than they once were. These two half definitions of friendship come to gather to explain that friend is someone who takes another how they already are and leaves that better than their previous state. True friendship often adds loyalty to ones character resulting in acts of courage.
“Every skill and every inquiry, and similarly every action and rational choice, is thought to aim at some good; and so the good has been aptly described as that which everything aims. But it is clear that there is some difference between ends: some ends are activities, while others are products which are additional to the activities. In cases where there are ends additional to the actions, the products are by their nature better than activities.” (Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics, as translated by Crisp, 2000, p. #3) Aristotle was the first philosopher who wrote a book on ethics titled, Nichomachean Ethics.
Philosophers have debated the distinct subjects such as justice and happiness extensively. For instance, Plato discusses the subject of justice by arguing that justice is what allows people to live excellently. In contrast, Aristotle discusses happiness by arguing that acquiring virtues enables people to achieve the ultimate goal of happiness. What is the meaning of the terms justice and happiness? The term happiness could be elucidated as a satisfaction from goals achieved or from one’s status.
In Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, he outlines the different scenarios in which one is responsible for her actions. There is, however, a possible objection which raises the possibility that nobody is responsible for their actions. Are we responsible for some of our actions after all? If so, under what circumstances?
This is the type of friendship that occurs only amongst people of exceptional virtues and who love and wish each other good and is based on the mutual good that each of the friends admires from the other. Aristotle describes moral virtues as a character to act appropriately, and a means between the extents of imperfection and vices. Complete friendships are also referred to as perfect friendships or Virtuous friendships. The emphasis or foundation of a complete friendship is the good virtue in the other partner in the friendship. Each sees and admires the good virtues in the other thus loves them for who they are and wishes them good.
In the treatise of Pythagoras “friendship is equality; equality is friendship” which he often repeated to his disciples. Timeus posits that koin.a ta. fi.lwn ei;naj “all common among friends” and filo,thj, i,so,thj friendship, equality and esteem nothing their own. So, to give away the possessions as a cause of opposition and trouble; for since all things were common amongst them, no man had properity to anything.
Aristotle claims that only good persons can be friends. What does he mean by this? Is there some truth to this? Is there something problematic about such a view of friendship? Explain the problem and some possible solutions to the problem.
Aristotles starting point is with the highest good. It is the ultimate end goal. The highest human good is always worth pursuing in its own right. It is an activity that is an end in itself. This conception allows him to isolate two features of what he determines the ‘end goal’ or ‘final purpose’.
Friendship is a radically different relationship amongst the five primary cardinal relationship mentioned in the WuLun (五伦). In this essay, we will be exploring the concept of friendship in the view of the Early Confucians thinkers and whether it is necessary for friendship to be grounded in commitment to the good. This is an important issue as Confucius himself always advocates cultivating of virtues. Lastly, this essay will also be explaining why Early Confucians thinkers believe it is necessary for friendship to be grounded in commitment to the good, and how it is still applicable in today’s context.
Virtue in his term is one that can meet the highest point of happiness; rich, fame, power, etc. In today’s society, it is kindness, intelligence, friendlessness, courage, etc. He would consider a celebrity to be at the highest peak of virtue and gain happiness, however, the happiness is normally attained even at that height. Someone who is poor and is sacrificing their food and money to help another poor family is someone to be considered as a true virtuous person. Aristotle didn’t think of how differently society would be then and now.
For sometimes men cannot make sure who are their friends and who are their enemies because sometimes the ones you consider friends intend to hurt you and by that they’re your enemies and not your friends, Socrates explains.
(Ethics 938). It is not enough to state that one is virtuous, nor is it enough for someone to be born virtuous and end there. Rather, it is the continuous pursuit, the juxtaposition of virtuous activity and of that which isn’t, that allows an individual to flourish in an Aristotelian society. We can deduce, then, that “…human