Nietzsche's Theory Of Genealogy

For Nietzsche, genealogy is neither a theory nor a theory of knowledge. It is best explained as an approach. He argued that philosophers back then used to see morality as something static, something that time and society could not change. The core of his ideology is that morality is simply a creation that has evolved over the years, depending on the views and the conditions surrounding the people in society. The basis for the argument that morality is not definite is that there are always opposing perspectives to a concept. In reality, even what is considered the truth is subject to debate, and the outcomes could prove contrary to common belief. Back then, most people and philosophers agreed that moral values were set by God and they were

Still, in another circumstance, punishment can be viewed as the exercising of the power available to an authority or individual. The indication of the differences in the meanings of the same things, depending on the surrounding circumstances, serves to show that there is no definite principle on morality. The argument is supported using the dissection of the meanings of the words bad, good, and evil. The meanings for the three words are constantly changing. What is considered good in one circumstance can be evil or bad in another, and vice versa. As a result, this leads to the conclusion that the standards of good and bad, as well as what is moral or not are not definite, which renders the concept of morality baseless. According to Nietzsche, it is likely that the competition for dominance and power is the best basis for explaining morality, noting that these definitions are changed through human interactions. In his second essay, Nietzsche contrasted what he called "master morality" and "slave morality." Master morality was developed by the strong, healthy, and free, who saw their own happiness as good and named it