In The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (“Huck Finn”), written by Mark Twain, readers follow the life of a southern child before the Civil War. Although this book is considered a popular and classic piece of American literature, there is much controversy over the language Twain used. Mark Twain used the normal, everyday vocabulary of people in the Southern Civil War Era. Some consider this novel vulgar and disrespectful due to the continuous use of the word “nigger” and other racial slurs. Due to this, there was books published with the word “nigger” replaced with “slave”. This change upset many people, and pleased the other half. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn should be able to have the word “nigger” because it shows how the Southern people …show more content…
Slaves were regular humans just like everyone else. In this time period, people discriminated them due to skin color and made them slaves. “Nigger” was a commonly used word in this time, and by omitting this word it is like one is omitting a piece of history along with it. Just because people can now erase the word from the book doesn 't mean they can erase the pain and hardships the slaves faced back then. An example from the novel is, “When they told me there was a state in this country where they 'd let that nigger vote, I drawed out. I says I 'll never vote ag 'in. Them 's the very words I said; they all heard me; and the country may rot for all me—I 'll never vote ag 'in as long as I live.” (Twain, 59) Another example is the First Amendment. The First Amendment gives the people their freedom of speech, press, assembly, petition, and religion. Therefore, Twain has the right to use whatever words he wants in his novel, due to freedom of speech. If one does not approve of the word in the book, they have the choice to buy or not to buy it. In the novel, Huck says shows he has freedom of speech by not telling that Jim ran off. “People would call me a low-down Abolitionist and despise me for keeping mum—but that don 't make no difference. I ain 't a-going to tell” …show more content…
Removing this word is almost like interfering with history. This word shows readers society was completely different back then towards African Americans. This generation has come a long way with equal rights, and this word has taught many readers about the past. Huck was raised in an envirnment where slavery was normal and not a bad thing. But as the story goes on, he realizes what the people of the current generation know, all people are equal. En example of this from the text is, “I never see a nigger that was a better nuss or faithfuller, and yet he was resking his freedom to do it…He ain’t no bad nigger, gentlemen; that’s what I think about him.” (Twain, 531) As conclusion, the word “nigger” should be allowed in Huck Finn without any hesitation. The people who disagree with this word being in this piece of literature do not understand the story whatsoever. The word is used to create a vivid picture of what life was like in the 1800’s, and how people treated others. People commonly referred to African Americans as “niggers”, and without this word in the book people will not understand the Southern Civil War feel that Twain was trying to
Due to the use of such language, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is accused for being racist. But the author, Mark Twain, himself was opposed to racial segregation and the harsh treatment of blacks. So given his ideals, there must be a reason why he chose to incorporate racial stereotypes and epithet into his story. Mark Twain did not intentionally use racial slurs in order to be racist or for the words to be condoned but rather “the use of such language was intended not only to reflect American life in the South prior to the Civil War but to treat it in an ironic fashion.” ( "Federal Appeals Court Allows Huck Finn to Remain on School 's Reading
Pitts utilizes anaphora, “...any work of art represents a series of conscious choices on the part of the artist — what color to paint, what note to play, what word to use — in that artist's attempt to share what is in his or her soul.” (Pitts 7) to emphasis the critical importance of why an author decides the precise diction towards their novels to portray events. Publishers may take note that altering the initial diction originally published, alters the historical background influencing the diction and phrase choice used in context. The audience may also sense a hasty generalization Pitt exhibits when judgmentally addressing how individuals find the racial slur used in context to be obscene; although many popular artists lyricize the same word exposing a number of individuals to become accustomed to the slur, absentmindedly ignoring the original degrading meaning as not everyone is comfortable hearing the slur. Although I do agree with not alternating original contents of novels, the way Pitts dictates his argument is too biter; it would be much more effective to explain how Huck Finn was written in 1884, a time in which there was a surplus of slave plantation workers and free individuals would coin the term to emphasize the downgrading nature of being a person of color compared
Teachers should just focus more upon what the book is actually about and relax a little more about the use of the offensive term. Some people just try to change the n word to “slave” to make the word more acceptable, but that is not how the word was used back then, so they do not need to change it
Censoring or hiding the word isn't the way to go, the word exists people will find it sooner or later so why not rip the Band-Aid and let it be taught in the best environment possible, a school. In an article named Masterpiece or racist trash by Barbara Apstein she wrote that “Jim embodies the stereotype of the “darky”: he is superstitious and gullible and often appears more childlike than Huck himself”(Barbara Apstein).Back then African Americans would have to deal with white people being on top of the hierarchy. The stereotype for black people back then was them being gullible and superstitious according to Barbara, having a definition for the n-word is a good thing for the country's society to know so that they can have more knowledge on the things they say. Barbara also stated that “Thoughtful examination of Twain's use of the n-word can help teach students the importance of understanding the context in which the word is used”(Barbara Apstein).Which perfectly sums up why it's important for students to have this knowledge. This history should be hidden under lock and key.
Since this book contains many racial slurs and violence, people want it banned or censored. Although, Huckleberry Finn should remain how it is because altering it changes the impact of the book, people will still be exposed to these slurs, and it is an opportunity to teach readers. The censored version of Huck Finn replaces the ‘N-word’ with the word ‘slave’. This would be an inaccurate representation because they have a
("Huck Finn in Context”). Within the United States, the word nigger was used as a means of contempt or disapproval. During the era of slavery, the words nigger and black were placed in front of common American names used as a means of distinguishing the slave from any white person. ("Nigger (the Word), a Brief History”).
American literature has always been a form of entertainment and education. When slaves were introduced as characters in books, they were always negative, stereotypical characters, but not until 1883 when Mark Twain wrote The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn was a change made. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is a book about a southern white boy in the 1800’s that runs away with an escaped slave on the Mississippi River. For years, schools have been debating on if the book should be banned in schools or not, and it is already on a variety of banned lists. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn should not be banned in schools because it is an anti-slavery novel that teaches students valuable lessons and informs students of the past culture.
Don’t censor To Kill a Mockingbird Rosa Parks once said, “Racism is still with us. But it is up to us to prepare our children for what they have to meet, and, hopefully, we shall overcome.” In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird the author Harper Lee uses the n-word 48 times and negro 54 times. This alone could cause readers to feel uncomfortable, along with the vulgar language and references to sexual activities. Some people may think that the best solution to these problems are to take out these words and censor the whole book.
Students should learn about the value the novel provides from that time-period in which Mark Twain wrote, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Twain put the N word in the novel for a reason, to describe the time-period in which these events had occurred. Phillip Rawls writes, “‘It’s such a shame that one word should be a barrier between a marvelous reading experience and a lot of readers,’ Gribben said. Yet Twain was particular about his words.”
Twain wrote Huckleberry Finn when the word "nigger" was simply used as a reflection of what the times were like in those days, using it didn't not cause a second thought. Twain makes out a time when Dark colored individuals were not treated as human
After reading The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn I could not understand people 's argument on banning this story that had gone way past it 's time showing the friendship between a black man and a white boy, which was almost unimaginable at the time in many people 's minds, and exposing the worst parts of humanity, showing that we don 't live in a picture-perfect world. While doing some research, however, I had found that most arguments against letting Huck Finn were because of the conspicuous and repetitive use of the n-word, as well as the extreme racial theme that is played out throughout the course of the novel. It all made sense to me then. As always America is again trying to cover up their insightful, but very real history, in hopes that it will be forgotten so that they can go on to be recognized as the
The black man on the back porch is afraid of the rattle snake because it is bad luck, or the innocent little slave is quick to believe everything one tells them at the drop of the hat. These are just some of the many racist stereotypes of the 1840s. A character named Jim is the star African American whom Twain bestoys the mission of being the stereotypical black man to prove a point. He along with his much more pallor companion Huck go on exciting adventures that unfold the events which expose the racist conduct of the time. In The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, Twain saturates his novel with potent images of acute racism severe enough as to create a satirical mien that exposes the absurdity of prejudice.
Connotations are included to make words more symbolic than its literal meaning. Twain uses the word “nigger” many times throughout his book not only because it was frequently used in that period, but to add meaning to the word. “”Sends the key to the punkin-headed nigger, and don't send nobody to watch the nigger.’” (Twain, 240).
The use of racial slurs throughout Huck Finn has been a controversial subject since the novel's publication in 1885. The most notable of these slurs the 214 occurrences of the word. The teachers worried that the use of such derogatory language may be an insult to The Many African American students in the diverse school systems of today's America and thus exclude the novel for from their curriculums.
Essay The novel The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain is a story about a young boy who is trying to find who he is during the civil war. In this novel by Mark Twain it speaks about this young boy, named Huck, and how his original morals are beginning to change while he helps free his friend Jim, who is a slave. Though People have argued that this book uses many racial slurs that demoralize the African American race. Though there is solid reasoning why those are not Mark Twain's true intentions.