No Child Left Behind Act Essay
Introduction
In 2001, when the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was created, the goal of NCLB was to increase the accountability of schools for the educational outcomes of their students and to bridge the gap between poor and high-performing students and districts. To accomplish this, NCLB placed considerable importance on standardized testing, which I will be examining the effectiveness of relative to the goals that NCLB sought to accomplish by 2014, within this paper. NCLB brought attention to the achievement gap and spurred efforts to improve educational outcomes for all students, particularly disadvantaged populations, through its accountability measures and reporting requirements, but its reliance on standardized testing and punitive consequences
…show more content…
In 1965 the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was passed. The ESEA tied the Title 1 funding from the federal government to the administration of a standardized test and if the scores were predominantly low there had to be some form of remediation that occurred (Gallagher, 2003, p. 94-95). However, the responsibility for this was not placed solely on individual schools. The ESEA did not allow for any national curriculum to develop, as schools and states had to work together when they fell behind in their scores (Gallagher, 2003, p. 94-95). The ESEA marked the first time that it was required under federal law to take a standardized test in the United States (Gallagher, 2003, p. 94-95). The fact that this is a recent phenomenon in our educational culture is something that should be taken into consideration continuing through the paper. The ESEA was renewed every 3 years or so and is still renewed to this day. In 2001 one of the most significant changes to this act was its renewal as …show more content…
NCLB required schools and districts to prepare annual report cards that detailed student progress on standardized tests for each school year. These report cards were meant to be delivered to students, parents, and communities. The intention was to ensure that everyone, especially parents, were aware of what was happening in their children's schools. Furthermore, this pillar briefly highlights the ultimate goal of NCLB, which was for all groups of students to improve their test-score performance, thereby eliminating the achievement gap between children of different backgrounds and to eventually reach the goal of nationwide competency at grade level within 12 years (Office of the Press Secretary,
The Goals 2000: Educate American Education
258 Words | 2 PagesThe Goals 2000: Educate America Act was a vital step to reform American education. The overall intent was to aid the nation move toward a system that was based on high standards that all students could meet —a system that will provide both equity and excellence for all of the pupils in this country. The police targeted state-grade support for reform in curriculum and assessment standards. By emphasizing standards-based reform and focused on content and performance standards, along with accountability for improvement, assessment, student performance, accountability, teacher preparation, community and parental involvement, and coordinated changes, to make a few (H. R. 10804 Goals, n.d.). The other object of this policy was to establish a
Annotated Bibliography
891 Words | 4 PagesThis non-periodical web source gives a brief overview of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. To start off, standardized testing is explained in detail, giving specific examples under the 2002 law of what tests are required at certain ages. The main idea is the goal of the No Child Left Behind Act, which is to shorten the educational gap between regular and advanced students. There are four pillars of the bill; accountability, flexibility, research-based education and parent options. The source further explains the pillars, for example, “Accountability: to ensure those students who are disadvantaged, achieve academic
Texas Accountability System History
1124 Words | 5 PagesThis new assessment tool had two major impacts. First, the expectations for individual students were raised by increasing the difficulty of the material on the assessment—no longer were the tests considered minimal skills tests. Passing each of the reading, writing and mathematics components of the grade 10 test, also known as the exit-level exam, was a requirement for receiving a high school diploma in the state. Second, schools were also held to higher standards with the expectation that not only the campus as whole but the specific subpopulations (African-American, Caucasian, Hispanic, and Economically Disadvantaged) had to achieve minimal standards. Passing rates on these standardized exams, along with attendance and drop-out data were used to assign schools accountability ratings with severe repercussions mandated for schools that were placed at the low end of the accountability scale (Texas Education Agency et al.,
President Lyndon B. Johnson's Administration Head Start
1543 Words | 7 PagesWith the scandal starting in 2008, America realized that this indignity thrived under George W. Bush’s presidency. The administration which provided the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) within schools. NCLB was President George W. Bush 's reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1964 (Kahlenburg, 2008, p. 1). Those investigating the effectiveness of it have suggested that the Act encouraged the removal and expulsion of "challenging" students through strict performance standards (Kim et al. 2012, p. 25). This criticism suggests the involvement of NCLB as a force perpetuating the "School to Prison Pipeline" connection.
Child Left Behind Act: Reauthorization Of The Elementary And Secondary Education Act Of 1965
445 Words | 2 PagesThe No Child Left Behind Act was a re-authorization of the Elementary and Secondary Act of 1965, the federal law regulating grades k through 12 education. The ESEA was the first that was enacted in 1965 and reauthorized in 1994. The law states a Title I, the flagship program for the disadvantaged students. The core of the NCLB tried to improve achievements through annual regular assessment for students, so quantifying education progress and making schools accountable for the performance of the students.
Standardized Testing Argumentative Essay
1229 Words | 5 PagesStandard testing is a very controversial and important subject because it deals with the progression of the American education system. The practice of these assessments has been highly scrutinized not only for the way it has changed the format of classrooms, but also for its accuracy, pressure, and abundance. In 2001, standardized testing became federally mandated through the No Child Left Behind Act by former president George Bush Jr. According to research from the Council of the Great City Schools, students have been taking “an average of 113 tests from pre-kindergarten through 12th grade” (K. Hefling). These numbers have increased to the point where parents have opted for their children to not attend standardized exams.
No Child Left Behind: A Failing Attempt At Reform Analysis
779 Words | 4 Pages“No Child Left Behind: A Failing Attempt at Reform,” written by Sarah E Holmes in 2010, examines the intended goals of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) versus the actual results the act has produced. The NCLB was implemented in 2001 under the George W. Bush administration. The goal of the act was to reach “100% proficiency of all groups of students in America by the year 2014.” Although ESEA and IASA were already developed the No Child Left Behind Act was intended to be a mash of the two and solve all the problems and weakness that both acts displayed. The NCLB act “ laid out consequences for schools that could not
ESEA Reauthorization Case Study
750 Words | 3 PagesRevision and the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1964 could affect real change to current practices. Its current version, the No Child Left Behind Act (2002), extended the testing and accountability measures first enacted into legislation in the prior revision and reauthorization of the ESEA, the Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994. NCLB led has to massive amounts of data being collected and stored in ways unimaginable when it was signed by President George W. Bush. This large scale digital data collection would continue under both the House and Senate’s recent revisions of the ESEA, as would the escalation of digital learning tools. In July, 2015, the House of Representatives of the 114th Congress approved
No Child Left Behind Act (Nclba)
792 Words | 4 PagesThe "No Child Left Behind Act" (P. L. 107-110) is a federal act which establishes a regime of statewide achievement tests in reading or language arts, math, and science that states must follow in order to receive a grant under Title I, Part A of the act (USDOE). This Title I grant is the largest federal grant to states and local school districts for the education of disadvantaged children. States receive millions of dollars in annual funding for their schools which are tied to the requirements found within the "No Child Left Behind Act" (NCLBA). The tests the act requires compose the key components of the NCLBA standards and accountability framework. Test results provide the basis for measuring state, school district, and school progress
Nclb Case Studies
959 Words | 4 Pages117). When schools could not meet these requirements then Case Study 2 No Child Left Behind Act Analysis 3 sanctioning by the Department of Education was enacted upon them including school improvement plans and major restructuring. The major criticism of the NCLB is that it violates the states’ rights to administer their own educational policies and traditional functions of local governments (Stephens & Wikstrom, 2007). These issues have arisen since the inception of the NCLB evaluations by testing and national surveys from the Department of Education showing failing rates of students not meeting standards of proficiencies for several states.
High Stakes Testing Argumentative Essay
247 Words | 1 PagesLike Barry Bonds on steroids, the overemphasis on standardized learning and assessments has distorted the true meaning of learning. Even if limited data was made available to “demonstrate” the efficacy of high stakes testing on improving math and reading scores, the negative implications behind testing are never taken into consideration. The very real practical result of years of NCLB-type reforms is that the intellectual life has been squeezed out of classrooms. The phrase “high standards” (or rigorous) by definition refers to standards that everyone won’t be able to meet.
The Argument Against Standardized Testing In Texas
1597 Words | 7 PagesThe state of Texas has been in a constant struggle within itself over just how to evaluate education, and standardized testing in Texas has been a major influencer in terms of the state’s standards for over thirty years. Though these methods of testing have been utilized for decades, resentment to the tests have been continuously rising among educators, parents, and students, but not everyone agrees. Despite government officials trying to quell these protests with changes to administration, and the way the test itself is formatted and formulated, there seems to have been little to no improvement made and those opposing the tests have started calling for an end to all standardized testing. For one to truly understand this ongoing struggle, one must first look at standardized testing’s beginning, then how government today is trying to fix the broken system, and finally consider the opinions of notable figures in the testing world.
High Stakes Testing Effects
927 Words | 4 PagesThe ESEA was revamped into the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act in 2002. The NCLB Act increased federal involvement by doubling the accountability
Child Left Behind Thesis
1499 Words | 6 PagesNow that the program has been in action for over a decade, the original ambitious goals and hopes set forth should have been met. Unfortunately, very little improvement has been made since its conception. In fact, Scott Abernathy (2007) states in his book that “No Child Left Behind aims to provide equality of outcomes. This is a very radical and ambitious goal.” (p. 2)
No Child Left Behind Act Argumentative Essay
2058 Words | 9 PagesThe No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 was the first federal law requiring schools to assess students and to put forth standards
More about No Child Left Behind Act Essay
The Goals 2000: Educate American Education
258 Words | 2 PagesAnnotated Bibliography
891 Words | 4 PagesTexas Accountability System History
1124 Words | 5 PagesPresident Lyndon B. Johnson's Administration Head Start
1543 Words | 7 PagesChild Left Behind Act: Reauthorization Of The Elementary And Secondary Education Act Of 1965
445 Words | 2 PagesStandardized Testing Argumentative Essay
1229 Words | 5 PagesNo Child Left Behind: A Failing Attempt At Reform Analysis
779 Words | 4 PagesESEA Reauthorization Case Study
750 Words | 3 PagesNo Child Left Behind Act (Nclba)
792 Words | 4 PagesNclb Case Studies
959 Words | 4 PagesHigh Stakes Testing Argumentative Essay
247 Words | 1 PagesThe Argument Against Standardized Testing In Texas
1597 Words | 7 PagesHigh Stakes Testing Effects
927 Words | 4 PagesChild Left Behind Thesis
1499 Words | 6 PagesNo Child Left Behind Act Argumentative Essay
2058 Words | 9 Pages